The Planetary Machine by Johannes Kepler
Authors:
Deniele L. R. Marini
Abstract:
While Kepler was still working in Graz during 1598, some letters to his mentor Michael Maestlin demonstrate his interest in astronomical clocks and machines. The first letter, dated January 6, 1598 contains a detailed description of a machine. In the second letter, written between June 1 and 11, 1598, Kepler starts with a brief review of clocks and machines of his time, then goes on to describe th…
▽ More
While Kepler was still working in Graz during 1598, some letters to his mentor Michael Maestlin demonstrate his interest in astronomical clocks and machines. The first letter, dated January 6, 1598 contains a detailed description of a machine. In the second letter, written between June 1 and 11, 1598, Kepler starts with a brief review of clocks and machines of his time, then goes on to describe the requirements necessary for a useful mechanical instrument, based on the latest information of the day. In the Epitome Astronomiae Copernicanae (1618) he reiterates the importance and utility of astronomical and horological machines to divulgate the Copernican model of the Cosmo, to inform and assist scientists in their celestial calculations and hypotheses, even during periods of poor visibility in the night sky. I will present a translation of the design by Kepler and a hypothetical three-dimensional virtual reconstruction of his machine. This project reveals the ongoing research by Kepler and his understanding of the cinematic of planets, still bound to the homocentric spheres concept while the idea of orbita was maturing. At the same time the project of Kepler reveals a reasoning on a clear description of retrograde motion of planets, fully developed later in his Astronomia Nova. His machine demonstrates the Copernican concept of the Sun and its planets as a unique system. He also wants to show how the planet moves from the viewpoint of an Earth based observer. He shows how to solve the basic mechanical problem of moving all the planets simultaneously with just one driving mechanism, which was impossible to accomplish with the Aristotelian theory of homocentric spheres.
△ Less
Submitted 30 August, 2022; v1 submitted 9 August, 2022;
originally announced August 2022.
