Face Coverings, Aerosol Dispersion and Mitigation of Virus Transmission Risk
Authors:
I. M. Viola,
B. Peterson,
G. Pisetta,
G. Pavar,
H. Akhtar,
F. Menoloascina,
E. Mangano,
K. E. Dunn,
R. Gabl,
A. Nila,
E. Molinari,
C. Cummins,
G. Thompson,
C. M. McDougall,
T. Y. M. Lo,
F. C. Denison,
P. Digard,
O. Malik,
M. J. G. Dunn,
F. Mehendale
Abstract:
The SARS-CoV-2 virus is primarily transmitted through virus-laden fluid particles ejected from the mouth of infected people. Face covers can mitigate the risk of virus transmission but their outward effectiveness is not fully ascertained. Objective: by using a background oriented schlieren technique, we aim to investigate the air flow ejected by a person while quietly and heavily breathing, while…
▽ More
The SARS-CoV-2 virus is primarily transmitted through virus-laden fluid particles ejected from the mouth of infected people. Face covers can mitigate the risk of virus transmission but their outward effectiveness is not fully ascertained. Objective: by using a background oriented schlieren technique, we aim to investigate the air flow ejected by a person while quietly and heavily breathing, while coughing, and with different face covers. Results: we found that all face covers without an outlet valve reduce the front flow through by at least 63% and perhaps as high as 86% if the unfiltered cough jet distance was resolved to the anticipated maximum distance of 2-3 m. However, surgical and handmade masks, and face shields, generate significant leakage jets that may present major hazards. Conclusions: the effectiveness of the masks should mostly be considered based on the generation of secondary jets rather than on the ability to mitigate the front throughflow.
△ Less
Submitted 30 January, 2021; v1 submitted 19 May, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
