Polarimetric detection of nonradial oscillation modes in the beta Cephei star beta Crucis
Authors:
Daniel V. Cotton,
Derek L. Buzasi,
Conny Aerts,
Jeremy Bailey,
Siemen Burssens,
May G. Pedersen,
Dennis Stello,
Lucyna Kedziora-Chudczer,
Ain De Horta,
Peter De Cat,
Fiona Lewis,
Sai Prathyusha Malla,
Duncan J. Wright,
Kimberly Bott
Abstract:
Here we report the detection of polarization variations due to nonradial modes in the beta Cephei star beta Crucis. In so doing we confirm 40-year-old predictions of pulsation-induced polarization variability and its utility in asteroseismology for mode identification. In an approach suited to other beta Cep stars, we combine polarimetry with space-based photometry and archival spectroscopy to ide…
▽ More
Here we report the detection of polarization variations due to nonradial modes in the beta Cephei star beta Crucis. In so doing we confirm 40-year-old predictions of pulsation-induced polarization variability and its utility in asteroseismology for mode identification. In an approach suited to other beta Cep stars, we combine polarimetry with space-based photometry and archival spectroscopy to identify the dominant nonradial mode in polarimetry, f2, as l = 3, m = -3 (in the m-convention of Dziembowski) and determine the stellar axis position angle as 25 (or 205) +/- 8 deg. The rotation axis inclination to the line of sight was derived as approx. 46 deg. from combined polarimetry and spectroscopy, facilitating identification of additional modes and allowing for asteroseismic modelling. This reveals a star of 14.5 +/- 0.5 Solar masses and a convective core containing approx. 28% of its mass -- making beta Crucis the most massive star with an asteroseismic age.
△ Less
Submitted 23 May, 2022;
originally announced May 2022.
Asteroseismic masses of four evolved planet-hosting stars using SONG and TESS: resolving the retired A-star mass controversy
Authors:
Sai Prathyusha Malla,
Dennis Stello,
Daniel Huber,
Benjamin T. Montet,
Timothy R. Bedding,
Mads Fredslund Andersen,
Frank Grundahl,
Jens Jessen-Hansen,
Daniel R. Hey,
Pere L. Palle,
Licai Deng,
Chunguang Zhang,
Xiaodian Chen,
James Lloyd,
Victoria Antoci
Abstract:
The study of planet occurrence as a function of stellar mass is important for a better understanding of planet formation. Estimating stellar mass, especially in the red giant regime, is difficult. In particular, stellar masses of a sample of evolved planet-hosting stars based on spectroscopy and grid-based modelling have been put to question over the past decade with claims they were overestimated…
▽ More
The study of planet occurrence as a function of stellar mass is important for a better understanding of planet formation. Estimating stellar mass, especially in the red giant regime, is difficult. In particular, stellar masses of a sample of evolved planet-hosting stars based on spectroscopy and grid-based modelling have been put to question over the past decade with claims they were overestimated. Although efforts have been made in the past to reconcile this dispute using asteroseismology, results were inconclusive. In an attempt to resolve this controversy, we study four more evolved planet-hosting stars in this paper using asteroseismology, and we revisit previous results to make an informed study of the whole ensemble in a self-consistent way. For the four new stars, we measure their masses by locating their characteristic oscillation frequency, $\mathrmν_{\mathrm{max}}$, from their radial velocity time series observed by SONG. For two stars, we are also able to measure the large frequency separation, $\mathrm{Δν}$, helped by extended SONG single-site and dual-site observations and new TESS observations. We establish the robustness of the $\mathrmν_{\mathrm{max}}$-only-based results by determining the stellar mass from $\mathrm{Δν}$, and from both $\mathrm{Δν}$ and $\mathrmν_{\mathrm{max}}$. We then compare the seismic masses of the full ensemble of 16 stars with the spectroscopic masses from three different literature sources. We find an offset between the seismic and spectroscopic mass scales that is mass-dependent, suggesting that the previously claimed overestimation of spectroscopic masses only affects stars more massive than about 1.6 M$_\mathrm{\odot}$.
△ Less
Submitted 22 June, 2020; v1 submitted 13 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
