-
Real-Space, Real-Time Approach to Quantum-Electrodynamical Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory
Authors:
Justin Malave,
Alexander Ahrens,
Daniel Pitagora,
Cody Covington,
Kálmán Varga
Abstract:
The Quantum-Electrodynamical Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory (QED-TDDFT) equations are solved by time propagating the wave function on a tensor product of a Fock-space and real-space grid. Applications for molecules in cavities show the accuracy of the approach. Examples include the coupling strength and light frequency dependence of the energies, wave functions, optical absorption spectr…
▽ More
The Quantum-Electrodynamical Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory (QED-TDDFT) equations are solved by time propagating the wave function on a tensor product of a Fock-space and real-space grid. Applications for molecules in cavities show the accuracy of the approach. Examples include the coupling strength and light frequency dependence of the energies, wave functions, optical absorption spectra, and Rabi splitting magnitudes in cavities, as well as a description of high harmonic generation in cavities.
△ Less
Submitted 1 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
Coupled Maxwell and Time-Dependent Orbital Free Density Functional Calculations
Authors:
Cody Covington,
Justin Malave,
Kalman Varga
Abstract:
Coupled Maxwell and time-dependent orbital-free calculations are implemented and tested to describe the interaction of electromagnetic waves and matter. The currents and induced fields predicted by the orbital-free calculations are compared to time-dependent density functional calculations and very good agreement is found for various systems including jellium sheets, jellium spheres, atomistic she…
▽ More
Coupled Maxwell and time-dependent orbital-free calculations are implemented and tested to describe the interaction of electromagnetic waves and matter. The currents and induced fields predicted by the orbital-free calculations are compared to time-dependent density functional calculations and very good agreement is found for various systems including jellium sheets, jellium spheres, atomistic sheets, and icosahedron clusters.
△ Less
Submitted 14 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
-
Neutrino oscillations: ILL experiment revisited
Authors:
B. K. Cogswell,
D. J. Ernst,
K. T. L. Ufheil,
J. T. Gaglione,
J. M. Malave
Abstract:
The ILL experiment, one of the "reactor anomaly" experiments, is re-examined. ILL's baseline of 8.78 m is the shortest of the short baseline experiments, and it is the experiment that finds the largest fraction of the electron anti-neutrinos disappearing -- over 20%. Previous analyses, if they do not ignore the ILL experiment, use functional forms for chisquare which are either totally new and unj…
▽ More
The ILL experiment, one of the "reactor anomaly" experiments, is re-examined. ILL's baseline of 8.78 m is the shortest of the short baseline experiments, and it is the experiment that finds the largest fraction of the electron anti-neutrinos disappearing -- over 20%. Previous analyses, if they do not ignore the ILL experiment, use functional forms for chisquare which are either totally new and unjustified, are the magnitude chi-square (also termed a "rate analysis"), or utilize a spectral form for chi-square which double counts the systematic error. We do an analysis which utilizes the standard, conventional form for chi-square as well as a derived form for a spectral chi-square. Results for the ILL, Huber, and Daya Bay fluxes are given. We find that the implications of the ILL experiment in providing evidence for a sterile, fourth neutrino are significantly enhanced. Moreover, we find that the ILL experiment provides a set of choices for specific values of the mass squared difference. The value of the mass square difference for the deepest minimum and its statistical significance, using the flux independent spectral chi-square and the Huber or Daya Bay flux are 0.92 eV$^2$ and 2.9 $σ$; for the conventional chi-square and the Daya Bay flux are 0.95 eV$^2$ and 3.0 $σ$; and for the conventional chi-square and Huber flux are 0.90 eV$^2$ and 3.3 $σ$. These probabilities are significantly larger than the 1.8 $σ$ found for the ILL experiment using a rate analysis.
△ Less
Submitted 18 October, 2018; v1 submitted 21 February, 2018;
originally announced February 2018.
