-
Uncertainty Propagation and Dynamic Robust Risk Measures
Authors:
Marlon Moresco,
Mélina Mailhot,
Silvana M. Pesenti
Abstract:
We introduce a framework for quantifying propagation of uncertainty arising in a dynamic setting. Specifically, we define dynamic uncertainty sets designed explicitly for discrete stochastic processes over a finite time horizon. These dynamic uncertainty sets capture the uncertainty surrounding stochastic processes and models, accounting for factors such as distributional ambiguity. Examples of un…
▽ More
We introduce a framework for quantifying propagation of uncertainty arising in a dynamic setting. Specifically, we define dynamic uncertainty sets designed explicitly for discrete stochastic processes over a finite time horizon. These dynamic uncertainty sets capture the uncertainty surrounding stochastic processes and models, accounting for factors such as distributional ambiguity. Examples of uncertainty sets include those induced by the Wasserstein distance and f-divergences.
We further define dynamic robust risk measures as the supremum of all candidates' risks within the uncertainty set. In an axiomatic way, we discuss conditions on the uncertainty sets that lead to well-known properties of dynamic robust risk measures, such as convexity and coherence. Furthermore, we discuss the necessary and sufficient properties of dynamic uncertainty sets that lead to time-consistencies of dynamic robust risk measures. We find that uncertainty sets stemming from f-divergences lead to strong time-consistency while the Wasserstein distance results in a new time-consistent notion of weak recursiveness. Moreover, we show that a dynamic robust risk measure is strong time-consistent or weak recursive if and only if it admits a recursive representation of one-step conditional robust risk measures arising from static uncertainty sets.
△ Less
Submitted 2 February, 2024; v1 submitted 24 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
Modeling and measuring incurred claims risk liabilities for a multi-line property and casualty insurer
Authors:
Carlos Andrés Araiza Iturria,
Frédéric Godin,
Mélina Mailhot
Abstract:
We propose a stochastic model allowing property and casualty insurers with multiple business lines to measure their liabilities for incurred claims risk and calculate associated capital requirements. Our model includes many desirable features which enable reproducing empirical properties of loss ratio dynamics. For instance, our model integrates a double generalized linear model relying on acciden…
▽ More
We propose a stochastic model allowing property and casualty insurers with multiple business lines to measure their liabilities for incurred claims risk and calculate associated capital requirements. Our model includes many desirable features which enable reproducing empirical properties of loss ratio dynamics. For instance, our model integrates a double generalized linear model relying on accident semester and development lag effects to represent both the mean and dispersion of loss ratio distributions, an autocorrelation structure between loss ratios of the various development lags, and a hierarchical copula model driving the dependence across the various business lines. The model allows for a joint simulation of loss triangles and the quantification of the overall portfolio risk through risk measures. Consequently, a diversification benefit associated to the economic capital requirements can be measured, in accordance with IFRS 17 standards which allow for the recognition of such benefit. The allocation of capital across business lines based on the Euler allocation principle is then illustrated. The implementation of our model is performed by estimating its parameters based on a car insurance data obtained from the General Insurance Statistical Agency (GISA), and by conducting numerical simulations whose results are then presented.
△ Less
Submitted 14 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
-
Range Value-at-Risk: Multivariate and Extreme Values
Authors:
Roba Bairakdar,
Lu Cao,
Melina Mailhot
Abstract:
The concept of univariate Range Value-at-Risk, presented by Cont et al. (2010), is extended in the multidimensional setting. Traditional risk measures are not well suited when dealing with heavy-tail distributions and infinite tail expectations. The multivariate definitions of robust truncated tail expectations are provided to overcome this problem. Robustness and other properties as well as empir…
▽ More
The concept of univariate Range Value-at-Risk, presented by Cont et al. (2010), is extended in the multidimensional setting. Traditional risk measures are not well suited when dealing with heavy-tail distributions and infinite tail expectations. The multivariate definitions of robust truncated tail expectations are provided to overcome this problem. Robustness and other properties as well as empirical estimators are derived. Closed-form expressions and special cases in the extreme value framework are also discussed. Numerical and graphical examples are provided to examine the accuracy of the empirical estimators.
△ Less
Submitted 25 May, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
-
Multivariate Geometric Expectiles
Authors:
Klaus Herrmann,
Marius Hofert,
Melina Mailhot
Abstract:
A generalization of expectiles for d-dimensional multivariate distribution functions is introduced. The resulting geometric expectiles are unique solutions to a convex risk minimization problem and are given by d-dimensional vectors. They are well behaved under common data transformations and the corresponding sample version is shown to be a consistent estimator. We exemplify their usage as risk m…
▽ More
A generalization of expectiles for d-dimensional multivariate distribution functions is introduced. The resulting geometric expectiles are unique solutions to a convex risk minimization problem and are given by d-dimensional vectors. They are well behaved under common data transformations and the corresponding sample version is shown to be a consistent estimator. We exemplify their usage as risk measures in a number of multivariate settings, highlighting the influence of varying margins and dependence structures.
△ Less
Submitted 17 January, 2018; v1 submitted 5 April, 2017;
originally announced April 2017.