-
A new approach for American option pricing: The Dynamic Chebyshev method
Authors:
Kathrin Glau,
Mirco Mahlstedt,
Christian Pötz
Abstract:
We introduce a new method to price American options based on Chebyshev interpolation. In each step of a dynamic programming time-step** we approximate the value function with Chebyshev polynomials. The key advantage of this approach is that it allows to shift the model-dependent computations into an offline phase prior to the time-step**. In the offline part a family of generalised (conditiona…
▽ More
We introduce a new method to price American options based on Chebyshev interpolation. In each step of a dynamic programming time-step** we approximate the value function with Chebyshev polynomials. The key advantage of this approach is that it allows to shift the model-dependent computations into an offline phase prior to the time-step**. In the offline part a family of generalised (conditional) moments is computed by an appropriate numerical technique such as a Monte Carlo, PDE or Fourier transform based method. Thanks to this methodological flexibility the approach applies to a large variety of models. Online, the backward induction is solved on a discrete Chebyshev grid, and no (conditional) expectations need to be computed. For each time step the method delivers a closed form approximation of the price function along with the options' delta and gamma. Moreover, the same family of (conditional) moments yield multiple outputs including the option prices for different strikes, maturities and different payoff profiles. We provide a theoretical error analysis and find conditions that imply explicit error bounds for a variety of stock price models. Numerical experiments confirm the fast convergence of prices and sensitivities. An empirical investigation of accuracy and runtime also shows an efficiency gain compared with the least-square Monte-Carlo method introduced by Longstaff and Schwartz (2001).
△ Less
Submitted 14 June, 2018;
originally announced June 2018.
-
Improved error bound for multivariate Chebyshev polynomial interpolation
Authors:
Kathrin Glau,
Mirco Mahlstedt
Abstract:
Chebyshev interpolation is a highly effective, intensively studied method and enjoys excellent numerical properties. The interpolation nodes are known beforehand, implementation is straightforward and the method is numerically stable. For efficiency, a sharp error bound is essential, in particular for high-dimensional applications. For tensorized Chebyshev interpolation, we present an error bound…
▽ More
Chebyshev interpolation is a highly effective, intensively studied method and enjoys excellent numerical properties. The interpolation nodes are known beforehand, implementation is straightforward and the method is numerically stable. For efficiency, a sharp error bound is essential, in particular for high-dimensional applications. For tensorized Chebyshev interpolation, we present an error bound that improves existing results significantly.
△ Less
Submitted 26 November, 2016;
originally announced November 2016.
-
Model reduction for calibration of American options
Authors:
Olena Burkovska,
Kathrin Glau,
Mirco Mahlstedt,
Barbara Wohlmuth
Abstract:
American put options are among the most frequently traded single stock options, and their calibration is computationally challenging since no closed-form expression is available. Due to the higher flexibility in comparison to European options, the mathematical model involves additional constraints, and a variational inequality is obtained. We use the Heston stochastic volatility model to describe…
▽ More
American put options are among the most frequently traded single stock options, and their calibration is computationally challenging since no closed-form expression is available. Due to the higher flexibility in comparison to European options, the mathematical model involves additional constraints, and a variational inequality is obtained. We use the Heston stochastic volatility model to describe the price of a single stock option. In order to speed up the calibration process, we apply two model reduction strategies. Firstly, a reduced basis method (RBM) is used to define a suitable low-dimensional basis for the numerical approximation of the parameter-dependent partial differential equation ($μ$PDE) model. By doing so the computational complexity for solving the $μ$PDE is drastically reduced, and applications of standard minimization algorithms for the calibration are significantly faster than working with a high-dimensional finite element basis. Secondly, so-called de-Americanization strategies are applied. Here, the main idea is to reformulate the calibration problem for American options as a problem for European options and to exploit closed-form solutions. Both reduction techniques are systematically compared and tested for both synthetic and market data sets.
△ Less
Submitted 19 November, 2016;
originally announced November 2016.
-
Calibration to American Options: Numerical Investigation of the de-Americanization
Authors:
Olena Burkovska,
Maximilian Gaß,
Kathrin Glau,
Mirco Mahlstedt,
Wim Schoutens,
Barbara Wohlmuth
Abstract:
American options are the reference instruments for the model calibration of a large and important class of single stocks. For this task, a fast and accurate pricing algorithm is indispensable. The literature mainly discusses pricing methods for American options that are based on Monte Carlo, tree and partial differential equation methods. We present an alternative approach that has become popular…
▽ More
American options are the reference instruments for the model calibration of a large and important class of single stocks. For this task, a fast and accurate pricing algorithm is indispensable. The literature mainly discusses pricing methods for American options that are based on Monte Carlo, tree and partial differential equation methods. We present an alternative approach that has become popular under the name de-Americanization in the financial industry. The method is easy to implement and enjoys fast run-times. Since it is based on ad hoc simplifications, however, theoretical results guaranteeing reliability are not available. To quantify the resulting methodological risk, we empirically test the performance of the de-Americanization method for calibration. We classify the scenarios in which de-Americanization performs very well. However, we also identify the cases where de-Americanization oversimplifies and can result in large errors.
△ Less
Submitted 18 November, 2016;
originally announced November 2016.
-
Chebyshev Interpolation for Parametric Option Pricing
Authors:
Maximilian Gaß,
Kathrin Glau,
Mirco Mahlstedt,
Maximilian Mair
Abstract:
Recurrent tasks such as pricing, calibration and risk assessment need to be executed accurately and in real-time. Simultaneously we observe an increase in model sophistication on the one hand and growing demands on the quality of risk management on the other. To address the resulting computational challenges, it is natural to exploit the recurrent nature of these tasks. We concentrate on Parametri…
▽ More
Recurrent tasks such as pricing, calibration and risk assessment need to be executed accurately and in real-time. Simultaneously we observe an increase in model sophistication on the one hand and growing demands on the quality of risk management on the other. To address the resulting computational challenges, it is natural to exploit the recurrent nature of these tasks. We concentrate on Parametric Option Pricing (POP) and show that polynomial interpolation in the parameter space promises to reduce run-times while maintaining accuracy. The attractive properties of Chebyshev interpolation and its tensorized extension enable us to identify criteria for (sub)exponential convergence and explicit error bounds. We show that these results apply to a variety of European (basket) options and affine asset models. Numerical experiments confirm our findings. Exploring the potential of the method further, we empirically investigate the efficiency of the Chebyshev method for multivariate and path-dependent options.
△ Less
Submitted 8 July, 2016; v1 submitted 18 May, 2015;
originally announced May 2015.
