ParaLarH: Parallel FPGA Router based upon Lagrange Heuristics
Authors:
Rohit Agrawal,
Kapil Ahuja,
Dhaarna Maheshwari,
Akash Kumar
Abstract:
Routing of the nets in Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) design flow is one of the most time consuming steps. Although Versatile Place and Route (VPR), which is a commonly used algorithm for this purpose, routes effectively, it is slow in execution. One way to accelerate this design flow is to use parallelization. Since VPR is intrinsically sequential, a set of parallel algorithms have been rec…
▽ More
Routing of the nets in Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) design flow is one of the most time consuming steps. Although Versatile Place and Route (VPR), which is a commonly used algorithm for this purpose, routes effectively, it is slow in execution. One way to accelerate this design flow is to use parallelization. Since VPR is intrinsically sequential, a set of parallel algorithms have been recently proposed for this purpose (ParaLaR and ParaLarPD).
These algorithms formulate the routing process as a Linear Program (LP) and solve it using the Lagrange relaxation, the sub-gradient method, and the Steiner tree algorithm. Out of the many metrics available to check the effectiveness of routing, ParaLarPD, which is an improved version of ParaLaR, suffers from large violations in the constraints of the LP problem (which is related to the minimum channel width metric) as well as an easily measurable critical path delay metric that can be improved further.
In this paper, we introduce a set of novel Lagrange heuristics that improve the Lagrange relaxation process. When tested on the MCNC benchmark circuits, on an average, this leads to halving of the constraints violation, up to 10% improvement in the minimum channel width, and up to 8% reduction in the critical path delay as obtained from ParaLarPD. We term our new algorithm as ParaLarH. Due to the increased work in the Lagrange relaxation process, as compared to ParaLarPD, ParaLarH does slightly deteriorate the speedup obtained because of parallelization, however, this aspect is easily compensated by using more number of threads.
△ Less
Submitted 22 October, 2020;
originally announced October 2020.
