-
Managing Expert Disagreement for the Policy Process and Beyond
Authors:
Ulrike Hahn,
Jens Koed Madsen,
Chris Reed
Abstract:
In this paper, we outline a new proposal for communicating scientific debate to policymakers and other stakeholders in circumstances where there is substantial disagreement within the scientific literature. In those circumstances, it seems important to provide policy makers both with a useful, balanced summary that is representative of opinion in the field large, and to transparently communicate t…
▽ More
In this paper, we outline a new proposal for communicating scientific debate to policymakers and other stakeholders in circumstances where there is substantial disagreement within the scientific literature. In those circumstances, it seems important to provide policy makers both with a useful, balanced summary that is representative of opinion in the field large, and to transparently communicate the actual evidence-base. To this end, we propose the compilation of argument maps through a collective intelligence process; these maps are then given to a wide sample of the relevant research community for evaluation and summary opinion in an IGM style IGM style poll (see igmchicago.org), which provides a representative view of opinion on the issue at stake within the wider scientific community. Policymakers then receive these two artefacts (map and poll) as their expert advice. Such a process would help overcome the resource limitations of the traditional expert advice process, while also providing greater balance by drawing on the expertise of researchers beyond the leading proponents of particular theories within a field. And, the actual evidence base would be transparent. In this paper, we present a pilot project step** through the map building component of such a policy advice scheme. We detail process, products, and issues encountered by implementing in the OVA (Online Visualisation of Argument tool, ova.arg-tech.org) an argument map with sample evidence from the behavioural literature on communicating probabilities, as a central issue within pandemic.
△ Less
Submitted 28 December, 2022;
originally announced December 2022.
-
Spin-Orbit-Torque-based Devices, Circuits and Architectures
Authors:
Farshad Moradi,
Hooman Farkhani,
Behzad Zeinali,
Hamdam Ghanatian,
Johan Michel Alain Pelloux-Prayer,
Tim Boehnert,
Mohammad Zahedinejad,
Hadi Heidari,
Vahid Nabaei,
Ricardo Ferreira,
Johan Akerman,
Jens Kargaard Madsen
Abstract:
Spintronics, the use of spin of an electron instead of its charge, has received huge attention from research communities for different applications including memory, interconnects, logic implementation, neuromorphic computing, and many other applications. Here, in this paper, we review the works within spintronics, more specifically on spin-orbit torque (SOT) within different research groups. We a…
▽ More
Spintronics, the use of spin of an electron instead of its charge, has received huge attention from research communities for different applications including memory, interconnects, logic implementation, neuromorphic computing, and many other applications. Here, in this paper, we review the works within spintronics, more specifically on spin-orbit torque (SOT) within different research groups. We also provide researchers an insight into the future potentials of the SOT-based designs. This comprehensive review paper covers different aspects of SOT-based design from device and circuit to architecture level as well as more ambitious and futuristic applications of such technology.
△ Less
Submitted 3 December, 2019;
originally announced December 2019.
-
Indirect inference through prediction
Authors:
Ernesto Carrella,
Richard M. Bailey,
Jens Koed Madsen
Abstract:
By recasting indirect inference estimation as a prediction rather than a minimization and by using regularized regressions, we can bypass the three major problems of estimation: selecting the summary statistics, defining the distance function and minimizing it numerically. By substituting regression with classification we can extend this approach to model selection as well. We present three exampl…
▽ More
By recasting indirect inference estimation as a prediction rather than a minimization and by using regularized regressions, we can bypass the three major problems of estimation: selecting the summary statistics, defining the distance function and minimizing it numerically. By substituting regression with classification we can extend this approach to model selection as well. We present three examples: a statistical fit, the parametrization of a simple real business cycle model and heuristics selection in a fishery agent-based model. The outcome is a method that automatically chooses summary statistics, weighs them and use them to parametrize models without running any direct minimization.
△ Less
Submitted 4 July, 2018;
originally announced July 2018.
