Data and knowledge-driven approaches for multilingual training to improve the performance of speech recognition systems of Indian languages
Authors:
A. Madhavaraj,
Ramakrishnan Angarai Ganesan
Abstract:
We propose data and knowledge-driven approaches for multilingual training of the automated speech recognition (ASR) system for a target language by pooling speech data from multiple source languages. Exploiting the acoustic similarities between Indian languages, we implement two approaches. In phone/senone map**, deep neural network (DNN) learns to map senones or phones from one language to the…
▽ More
We propose data and knowledge-driven approaches for multilingual training of the automated speech recognition (ASR) system for a target language by pooling speech data from multiple source languages. Exploiting the acoustic similarities between Indian languages, we implement two approaches. In phone/senone map**, deep neural network (DNN) learns to map senones or phones from one language to the others, and the transcriptions of the source languages are modified such that they can be used along with the target language data to train and fine-tune the target language ASR system. In the other approach, we model the acoustic information for all the languages simultaneously by training a multitask DNN (MTDNN) to predict the senones of each language in different output layers. The cross-entropy loss and the weight update procedure are modified such that only the shared layers and the output layer responsible for predicting the senone classes of a language are updated during training, if the feature vector belongs to that particular language. In the low-resource setting (LRS), 40 hours of transcribed data each for Tamil, Telugu and Gujarati languages are used for training. The DNN based senone map** technique gives relative improvements in word error rates (WER) of 9.66%, 7.2% and 15.21% over the baseline system for Tamil, Gujarati and Telugu languages, respectively. In medium-resourced setting (MRS), 160, 275 and 135 hours of data for Tamil, Kannada and Hindi languages are used, where, the same technique gives better relative improvements of 13.94%, 10.28% and 27.24% for Tamil, Kannada and Hindi, respectively. The MTDNN with senone map** based training in LRS, gives higher relative WER improvements of 15.0%, 17.54% and 16.06%, respectively for Tamil, Gujarati and Telugu, whereas in MRS, we see improvements of 21.24% 21.05% and 30.17% for Tamil, Kannada and Hindi languages, respectively.
△ Less
Submitted 24 January, 2022;
originally announced January 2022.
Subjective and objective experiments on the influence of speaker's gender on the unvoiced segments
Authors:
A Madhavaraj,
T V Ananthapadmanabha,
A G Ramakrishnan
Abstract:
Subjective and objective experiments are conducted to understand the extent to which a speaker's gender influences the acoustics of unvoiced (U) sounds. U segments of utterances are replaced by the corresponding segments of a speaker of opposite gender to prepare modified utterances. Humans are asked to judge if the modified utterance is spoken by one or two speakers. The experiments show that hum…
▽ More
Subjective and objective experiments are conducted to understand the extent to which a speaker's gender influences the acoustics of unvoiced (U) sounds. U segments of utterances are replaced by the corresponding segments of a speaker of opposite gender to prepare modified utterances. Humans are asked to judge if the modified utterance is spoken by one or two speakers. The experiments show that human subjects are unable to distinguish the modified from the original. Thus, listeners are able to identify the U segments irrespective of the gender, which may be based on some speaker-independent invariant acoustic cues. To test if this finding is purely a perceptual phenomenon, objective experiments are also conducted. Gender specific HMM based phoneme recognition systems are trained using the TIMIT training set and tested on (a) utterances spoken by the same gender (b) utterances spoken by the opposite gender and (c) the modified utterances of the test set. As expected, the performance is the highest for case (a) and the lowest for case (b). The performance degrades only slightly for case (c). This result shows that the speaker's gender does not as strongly influence the acoustics of U sounds as they do the voiced sounds.
△ Less
Submitted 16 July, 2018;
originally announced July 2018.
