Effect of Cu intercalation and pressure on excitonic interaction in 1T-TiSe2
Authors:
Shunsuke Kitou,
Akitoshi Nakano,
Shintaro Kobayashi,
Kento Sugawara,
Naoyuki Katayama,
Naoyuki Maejima,
Akihiko Machida,
Tetsu Watanuki,
Koichi Ichimura,
Satoshi Tanda,
Toshikazu Nakamura,
Hiroshi Sawa
Abstract:
1T-TiSe2 has a semimetallic band structure at room temperature and undergoes phase transition to a triple-q charge density wave (CDW) state with a commensurate superlattice structure (2a * 2a * 2c) below Tc ~ 200 K at ambient pressure. This phase transition is caused by cooperative phenomena involving electron-phonon and electron-hole (excitonic) interactions, and cannot be described by a standard…
▽ More
1T-TiSe2 has a semimetallic band structure at room temperature and undergoes phase transition to a triple-q charge density wave (CDW) state with a commensurate superlattice structure (2a * 2a * 2c) below Tc ~ 200 K at ambient pressure. This phase transition is caused by cooperative phenomena involving electron-phonon and electron-hole (excitonic) interactions, and cannot be described by a standard CDW framework. By Cu intercalation or the application of pressure, this phase transition temperature is suppressed and superconductivity (SC) appears. However, it is not clear what kind of order parameters are affected by these two procedures. We investigated the crystal structure of CuxTiSe2 and pressurized 1T-TiSe2 around the SC state by synchrotron x-ray diffraction on single crystals. In the high-temperature phase, the variation of structural parameters for the case of Cu intercalation and application of pressure are considerably different. Moreover, the relationship between the critical points of the CDW phase transition and the SC dome are also different for the two cases. The excitonic interaction appears to play an important role in the P-T phase diagram of 1T-TiSe2, but not in the x-T phase diagram.
△ Less
Submitted 28 March, 2019; v1 submitted 6 February, 2019;
originally announced February 2019.
Maximizing Tc by tuning nematicity and magnetism in FeSe1-xSx superconductors
Authors:
K. Matsuura,
Y. Mizukami,
Y. Arai,
Y. Sugimura,
N. Maejima,
A. Machida,
T. Watanuki,
T. Fukuda,
T. Yajima,
Z. Hiroi,
K. Y. Yip,
Y. C. Chan,
Q. Niu,
S. Hosoi,
K. Ishida,
K. Mukasa,
S. Kasahara,
J. -G. Cheng,
S. K. Goh,
Y. Matsuda,
Y. Uwatoko,
T. Shibauchi
Abstract:
A fundamental issue concerning iron-based superconductivity is the roles of electronic nematicity and magnetism in realising high transition temperature ($T_{\rm c}$). To address this issue, FeSe is a key material, as it exhibits a unique pressure phase diagram involving nonmagnetic nematic and pressure-induced antiferromagnetic ordered phases. However, as these two phases in FeSe overlap with eac…
▽ More
A fundamental issue concerning iron-based superconductivity is the roles of electronic nematicity and magnetism in realising high transition temperature ($T_{\rm c}$). To address this issue, FeSe is a key material, as it exhibits a unique pressure phase diagram involving nonmagnetic nematic and pressure-induced antiferromagnetic ordered phases. However, as these two phases in FeSe overlap with each other, the effects of two orders on superconductivity remain perplexing. Here we construct the three-dimensional electronic phase diagram, temperature ($T$) against pressure ($P$) and isovalent S-substitution ($x$), for FeSe$_{1-x}$S$_{x}$, in which we achieve a complete separation of nematic and antiferromagnetic phases. In between, an extended nonmagnetic tetragonal phase emerges, where we find a striking enhancement of $T_{\rm c}$. The completed phase diagram uncovers two superconducting domes with similarly high $T_{\rm c}$ on both ends of the dome-shaped antiferromagnetic phase. The $T_{\rm c}(P,x)$ variation implies that nematic fluctuations unless accompanying magnetism are not relevant for high-$T_{\rm c}$ superconductivity in this system.
△ Less
Submitted 6 September, 2017; v1 submitted 6 April, 2017;
originally announced April 2017.
