Estimating the Blood Supply Elasticity: Evidence from a Universal Scale Benefit Scheme
Authors:
Sara R. Machado
Abstract:
I estimate the semi-elasticity of blood donations with respect to a monetary benefit, namely the waiver of user fees when using the National Health Service, in Portugal. Using within-county variation over time in the value of the benefitI estimate both the unconditional elasticity, which captures overall response of the market, and the conditional elasticity, which holds constant the number of blo…
▽ More
I estimate the semi-elasticity of blood donations with respect to a monetary benefit, namely the waiver of user fees when using the National Health Service, in Portugal. Using within-county variation over time in the value of the benefitI estimate both the unconditional elasticity, which captures overall response of the market, and the conditional elasticity, which holds constant the number of blood drives. This amounts to fixing a measure of the cost of donation to the blood donor. I instrument for the number of blood drives, which is endogenous, using a variable based on the number of weekend days and the proportion of blood drives on weekends. A one euro increase in the subsidy leads 1.8% more donations per 10000 inhabitants, conditional on the number of blood drives. The unconditional effect is smaller. The benefit does not attract new donors, instead it fosters repeated donation. Furthermore, the discontinuation of the benefit lead to a predicted decrease in donations of around 18%, on average. However, I show that blood drives have the potential to effectively substitute monetary incentives in solving market imbalances.
△ Less
Submitted 3 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
I call BS: Fraud Detection in Crowdfunding Campaigns
Authors:
Beatrice Perez,
Sara R. Machado,
Jerone T. A. Andrews,
Nicolas Kourtellis
Abstract:
Donations to charity-based crowdfunding environments have been on the rise in the last few years. Unsurprisingly, deception and fraud in such platforms have also increased, but have not been thoroughly studied to understand what characteristics can expose such behavior and allow its automatic detection and blocking. Indeed, crowdfunding platforms are the only ones typically performing oversight fo…
▽ More
Donations to charity-based crowdfunding environments have been on the rise in the last few years. Unsurprisingly, deception and fraud in such platforms have also increased, but have not been thoroughly studied to understand what characteristics can expose such behavior and allow its automatic detection and blocking. Indeed, crowdfunding platforms are the only ones typically performing oversight for the campaigns launched in each service. However, they are not properly incentivized to combat fraud among users and the campaigns they launch: on the one hand, a platform's revenue is directly proportional to the number of transactions performed (since the platform charges a fixed amount per donation); on the other hand, if a platform is transparent with respect to how much fraud it has, it may discourage potential donors from participating.
In this paper, we take the first step in studying fraud in crowdfunding campaigns. We analyze data collected from different crowdfunding platforms, and annotate 700 campaigns as fraud or not. We compute various textual and image-based features and study their distributions and how they associate with campaign fraud. Using these attributes, we build machine learning classifiers, and show that it is possible to automatically classify such fraudulent behavior with up to 90.14% accuracy and 96.01% AUC, only using features available from the campaign's description at the moment of publication (i.e., with no user or money activity), making our method applicable for real-time operation on a user browser.
△ Less
Submitted 30 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
