3D Reconstruction and Segmentation of Dissection Photographs for MRI-free Neuropathology
Authors:
Henry Tregidgo,
Adria Casamitjana,
Caitlin Latimer,
Mitchell Kilgore,
Eleanor Robinson,
Emily Blackburn,
Koen Van Leemput,
Bruce Fischl,
Adrian Dalca,
Christine Mac Donald,
Dirk Keene,
Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Abstract:
Neuroimaging to neuropathology correlation (NTNC) promises to enable the transfer of microscopic signatures of pathology to in vivo imaging with MRI, ultimately enhancing clinical care. NTNC traditionally requires a volumetric MRI scan, acquired either ex vivo or a short time prior to death. Unfortunately, ex vivo MRI is difficult and costly, and recent premortem scans of sufficient quality are se…
▽ More
Neuroimaging to neuropathology correlation (NTNC) promises to enable the transfer of microscopic signatures of pathology to in vivo imaging with MRI, ultimately enhancing clinical care. NTNC traditionally requires a volumetric MRI scan, acquired either ex vivo or a short time prior to death. Unfortunately, ex vivo MRI is difficult and costly, and recent premortem scans of sufficient quality are seldom available. To bridge this gap, we present methodology to 3D reconstruct and segment full brain image volumes from brain dissection photographs, which are routinely acquired at many brain banks and neuropathology departments. The 3D reconstruction is achieved via a joint registration framework, which uses a reference volume other than MRI. This volume may represent either the sample at hand (e.g., a surface 3D scan) or the general population (a probabilistic atlas). In addition, we present a Bayesian method to segment the 3D reconstructed photographic volumes into 36 neuroanatomical structures, which is robust to nonuniform brightness within and across photographs. We evaluate our methods on a dataset with 24 brains, using Dice scores and volume correlations. The results show that dissection photography is a valid replacement for ex vivo MRI in many volumetric analyses, opening an avenue for MRI-free NTNC, including retrospective data. The code is available at https://github.com/htregidgo/DissectionPhotoVolumes.
△ Less
Submitted 11 September, 2020;
originally announced September 2020.
Network Differential Connectivity Analysis
Authors:
Sen Zhao,
Stephen Ottinger,
Suzanne Peck,
Christine Mac Donald,
Ali Shojaie
Abstract:
Identifying differences in networks has become a canonical problem in many biological applications. Here, we focus on testing whether two Gaussian graphical models are the same. Existing methods try to accomplish this goal by either directly comparing their estimated structures, or testing the null hypothesis that the partial correlation matrices are equal. However, estimation approaches do not pr…
▽ More
Identifying differences in networks has become a canonical problem in many biological applications. Here, we focus on testing whether two Gaussian graphical models are the same. Existing methods try to accomplish this goal by either directly comparing their estimated structures, or testing the null hypothesis that the partial correlation matrices are equal. However, estimation approaches do not provide measures of uncertainty, e.g., $p$-values, which are crucial in drawing scientific conclusions. On the other hand, existing testing approaches could lead to misleading results in some cases. To address these shortcomings, we propose a qualitative hypothesis testing framework, which tests whether the connectivity patterns in the two networks are the same. Our framework is especially appropriate if the goal is to identify nodes or edges that are differentially connected. No existing approach could test such hypotheses and provide corresponding measures of uncertainty, e.g., $p$-values. We investigate theoretical and numerical properties of our proposal and illustrate its utility in biological applications. Theoretically, we show that under appropriate conditions, our proposal correctly controls the type-I error rate in testing the qualitative hypothesis. Empirically, we demonstrate the performance of our proposal using simulation datasets and applications in cancer genetics and brain imaging studies.
△ Less
Submitted 30 September, 2019;
originally announced September 2019.
