Assessing the distribution of discrete survival time in presence of recall error
Authors:
Sedigheh Mirzaei Salehabadi,
Edwina Yeung,
Germaine M. Buck Louis,
Rajeshwari Sundaram
Abstract:
Retrospectively ascertained survival time may be subject to recall error. An example of discrete survival time with such recall error is time-to-pregnancy (TTP), the number of months non-contracepting couples require to get pregnant which is a measure of human fecundity. The epidemiological literature has demonstrated that retrospective TTP is subject to recall error and statistical models focusin…
▽ More
Retrospectively ascertained survival time may be subject to recall error. An example of discrete survival time with such recall error is time-to-pregnancy (TTP), the number of months non-contracepting couples require to get pregnant which is a measure of human fecundity. The epidemiological literature has demonstrated that retrospective TTP is subject to recall error and statistical models focusing on TTP have not accounted for the recall error. We propose a multistage model that utilizes women's retrospectively-reported TTP and associated certainty to estimate the TTP distribution. Our proposed model utilizes a discrete survival function that accounts for random heterogeneity arising from between women TTP data as well as a multinomial regression model to account for her certainty as accuracy may decline over time, i.e., depends on time since pregnancy in estimating the TTP distribution. Other novel features of the model include attention to whether the pregnancy was (un)planned as well as providing an approach to predict survival function for women without a reported TTP. Our model allows for the consideration of covariates for each of the underlying factors of (un)planned pregnancy, measure of certainty and TTP distribution. The proposed model is applicable for any discrete survival time when certainty in reporting may be a consideration. We use Monte Carlo simulations to assess the finite sample performance for the proposed estimators. We illustrate our proposed method using data from Upstate KIDS Study.
△ Less
Submitted 16 October, 2018;
originally announced October 2018.
Cautionary note on "Semiparametric modeling of grouped current duration data with preferential reporting'"
Authors:
Alexander C. McLain,
Rajeshwari Sundaram,
Marie Thoma,
Germaine M. Buck Louis
Abstract:
This report is designed to clarify a few points about the article "Semiparametric modeling of grouped current duration data with preferential reporting" by McLain, Sundaram, Thoma and Louis in Statistics in Medicine (McLain et al., 2014, hereafter MSTL) regarding using the methods under right censoring. In simulation studies, it has been found that bias can occur when right censoring is present. C…
▽ More
This report is designed to clarify a few points about the article "Semiparametric modeling of grouped current duration data with preferential reporting" by McLain, Sundaram, Thoma and Louis in Statistics in Medicine (McLain et al., 2014, hereafter MSTL) regarding using the methods under right censoring. In simulation studies, it has been found that bias can occur when right censoring is present. Current duration data normally does not have censored values, but censoring can be induced at a value, say tau, after which the data values are thought to be unreliable. As noted in MSTL, some right censored data require an assumption on the parametric form of the data beyond τ. While this assumption was given in MSTL, the implications of the assumption were not sufficiently explored. Here we present simulations and evaluate the methods of MSTL under type I censoring, give some settings under which the method works well even in presence of censoring, state when the model is correctly specified and discuss the reasons of the bias.
△ Less
Submitted 2 January, 2018;
originally announced January 2018.
