Kinetic-scale current sheets in near-Sun solar wind: properties, scale-dependent features and reconnection onset
Authors:
A. Lotekar,
I. Y. Vasko,
T. Phan,
S. D. Bale,
T. A. Bowen,
J. Halekas,
A. V. Artemyev,
Yu. Khotyaintsev,
F. S. Mozer
Abstract:
We present statistical analysis of 11,200 proton kinetic-scale current sheets (CS) observed by Parker Solar Probe during 10 days around the first perihelion. The CS thickness $λ$ is in the range from a few to 200 km with the typical value around 30 km, while current densities are in the range from 0.1 to 10\;$μ{\rm A/m^2}$ with the typical value around 0.7\;$μ{\rm A/m^2}$. These CSs are resolved t…
▽ More
We present statistical analysis of 11,200 proton kinetic-scale current sheets (CS) observed by Parker Solar Probe during 10 days around the first perihelion. The CS thickness $λ$ is in the range from a few to 200 km with the typical value around 30 km, while current densities are in the range from 0.1 to 10\;$μ{\rm A/m^2}$ with the typical value around 0.7\;$μ{\rm A/m^2}$. These CSs are resolved thanks to magnetic field measurements at 73--290 Samples/s resolution. In terms of proton inertial length $λ_{p}$, the CS thickness $λ$ is in the range from about $0.1$ to $10λ_{p}$ with the typical value around 2$λ_{p}$. The magnetic field magnitude does not substantially vary across the CSs and, accordingly, the current density is dominated by the magnetic field-aligned component. The CSs are typically asymmetric with statistically different magnetic field magnitudes at the CS boundaries. The current density is larger for smaller-scale CSs, $J_0\approx 0.15 \cdot (λ/100\;{\rm km})^{-0.76}$ $μ{\rm A/m^2}$, but does not statistically exceed the Alfvén current density $J_A$ corresponding to the ion-electron drift of local Alfvén speed. The CSs exhibit remarkable scale-dependent current density and magnetic shear angles, $J_0/J_{A}\approx 0.17\cdot (λ/λ_{p})^{-0.67}$ and $Δθ\approx 21^{\circ}\cdot (λ/λ_{p})^{0.32}$. Based on these observations and comparison to recent studies at 1 AU, we conclude that proton kinetic-scale CSs in the near-Sun solar wind are produced by turbulence cascade and they are automatically in the parameter range, where reconnection is not suppressed by the diamagnetic mechanism, due to their geometry dictated by turbulence cascade.
△ Less
Submitted 24 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
Understanding Forbush decrease drivers based on shock-only and CME-only models using global signature of February 14, 1978 event
Authors:
Anil Raghav,
Ankush Bhaskar,
Ajay Lotekar,
Geeta Vichare,
Virendra Yadav
Abstract:
We have studied Forbush decrease (FD) event occurred on February 14, 1978 using 43 neutron monitor observatories to understand the global signature of FD. We have studied rigidity dependence of shock amplitude and total FD amplitude. We have found almost the same power law index for both shock phase amplitude and total FD amplitude. Local time variation of shock phase amplitude and maximum depress…
▽ More
We have studied Forbush decrease (FD) event occurred on February 14, 1978 using 43 neutron monitor observatories to understand the global signature of FD. We have studied rigidity dependence of shock amplitude and total FD amplitude. We have found almost the same power law index for both shock phase amplitude and total FD amplitude. Local time variation of shock phase amplitude and maximum depression time of FD have been investigated which indicate possible effect of shock/CME orientation. We have analyzed rigidity dependence of time constants of two phase recovery. Time constants of slow component of recovery phase show rigidity dependence and implies possible effect of diffusion. Solar wind speed was observed to be well correlated with slow component of FD recovery phase. This indicates solar wind speed as possible driver of recovery phase. To investigate the contribution of interplanetary drivers, shock and CME in FD, we have used shock-only and CME-only models. We have applied these models separately to shock phase and main phase amplitudes respectively. This confirms present accepted physical scenario that the first step of FD is due to propagating shock barrier and second step is due to flux rope of CME/magnetic cloud.
△ Less
Submitted 18 June, 2014;
originally announced June 2014.
