-
Comparison of methods for mediation analysis with multiple correlated mediators
Authors:
Mary Appah,
D. Leann Long,
George Howard,
Melissa J. Smith
Abstract:
Various methods have emerged for conducting mediation analyses with multiple correlated mediators, each with distinct strengths and limitations. However, a comparative evaluation of these methods is lacking, providing the motivation for this paper. This study examines six mediation analysis methods for multiple correlated mediators that provide insights to the contributors for health disparities.…
▽ More
Various methods have emerged for conducting mediation analyses with multiple correlated mediators, each with distinct strengths and limitations. However, a comparative evaluation of these methods is lacking, providing the motivation for this paper. This study examines six mediation analysis methods for multiple correlated mediators that provide insights to the contributors for health disparities. We assessed the performance of each method in identifying joint or path-specific mediation effects in the context of binary outcome variables varying mediator types and levels of residual correlation between mediators. Through comprehensive simulations, the performance of six methods in estimating joint and/or path-specific mediation effects was assessed rigorously using a variety of metrics including bias, mean squared error, coverage and width of the 95$\%$ confidence intervals. Subsequently, these methods were applied to the REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study, where differing conclusions were obtained depending on the mediation method employed. This evaluation provides valuable guidance for researchers grappling with complex multi-mediator scenarios, enabling them to select an optimal mediation method for their research question and dataset.
△ Less
Submitted 23 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
Path-specific causal decomposition analysis with multiple correlated mediator variables
Authors:
Melissa J. Smith,
Leslie A. McClure,
D. Leann Long
Abstract:
A causal decomposition analysis allows researchers to determine whether the difference in a health outcome between two groups can be attributed to a difference in each group's distribution of one or more modifiable mediator variables. With this knowledge, researchers and policymakers can focus on designing interventions that target these mediator variables. Existing methods for causal decompositio…
▽ More
A causal decomposition analysis allows researchers to determine whether the difference in a health outcome between two groups can be attributed to a difference in each group's distribution of one or more modifiable mediator variables. With this knowledge, researchers and policymakers can focus on designing interventions that target these mediator variables. Existing methods for causal decomposition analysis either focus on one mediator variable or assume that each mediator variable is conditionally independent given the group label and the mediator-outcome confounders. In this paper, we propose a flexible causal decomposition analysis method that can accommodate multiple correlated and interacting mediator variables, which are frequently seen in studies of health behaviors and studies of environmental pollutants. We extend a Monte Carlo-based causal decomposition analysis method to this setting by using a multivariate mediator model that can accommodate any combination of binary and continuous mediator variables. Furthermore, we state the causal assumptions needed to identify both joint and path-specific decomposition effects through each mediator variable. To illustrate the reduction in bias and confidence interval width of the decomposition effects under our proposed method, we perform a simulation study. We also apply our approach to examine whether differences in smoking status and dietary inflammation score explain any of the Black-White differences in incident diabetes using data from a national cohort study.
△ Less
Submitted 14 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
Population-average mediation analysis for zero-inflated count outcomes
Authors:
Andrew Sims,
D. Leann Long,
Hemant K. Tiwari,
**hong Cui,
Dustin M. Long,
Todd M. Brown,
Melissa J. Smith,
Emily B. Levitan
Abstract:
Mediation analysis is an increasingly popular statistical method for explaining causal pathways to inform intervention. While methods have increased, there is still a dearth of robust mediation methods for count outcomes with excess zeroes. Current mediation methods addressing this issue are computationally intensive, biased, or challenging to interpret. To overcome these limitations, we propose a…
▽ More
Mediation analysis is an increasingly popular statistical method for explaining causal pathways to inform intervention. While methods have increased, there is still a dearth of robust mediation methods for count outcomes with excess zeroes. Current mediation methods addressing this issue are computationally intensive, biased, or challenging to interpret. To overcome these limitations, we propose a new mediation methodology for zero-inflated count outcomes using the marginalized zero-inflated Poisson (MZIP) model and the counterfactual approach to mediation. This novel work gives population-average mediation effects whose variance can be estimated rapidly via delta method. This methodology is extended to cases with exposure-mediator interactions. We apply this novel methodology to explore if diabetes diagnosis can explain BMI differences in healthcare utilization and test model performance via simulations comparing the proposed MZIP method to existing zero-inflated and Poisson methods. We find that our proposed method minimizes bias and computation time compared to alternative approaches while allowing for straight-forward interpretations.
△ Less
Submitted 13 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
Spike-and-Slab LASSO Generalized Additive Models and Scalable Algorithms for High-Dimensional Data Analysis
Authors:
Boyi Guo,
Byron C. Jaeger,
A. K. M. Fazlur Rahman,
D. Leann Long,
Nengjun Yi
Abstract:
There are proposals that extend the classical generalized additive models (GAMs) to accommodate high-dimensional data ($p>>n$) using group sparse regularization. However, the sparse regularization may induce excess shrinkage when estimating smooth functions, damaging predictive performance. Moreover, most of these GAMs consider an "all-in-all-out" approach for functional selection, rendering them…
▽ More
There are proposals that extend the classical generalized additive models (GAMs) to accommodate high-dimensional data ($p>>n$) using group sparse regularization. However, the sparse regularization may induce excess shrinkage when estimating smooth functions, damaging predictive performance. Moreover, most of these GAMs consider an "all-in-all-out" approach for functional selection, rendering them difficult to answer if nonlinear effects are necessary. While some Bayesian models can address these shortcomings, using Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms for model fitting creates a new challenge, scalability. Hence, we propose Bayesian hierarchical generalized additive models as a solution: we consider the smoothing penalty for proper shrinkage of curve interpolation via reparameterization. A novel two-part spike-and-slab LASSO prior for smooth functions is developed to address the sparsity of signals while providing extra flexibility to select the linear or nonlinear components of smooth functions. A scalable and deterministic algorithm, EM-Coordinate Descent, is implemented in an open-source R package BHAM. Simulation studies and metabolomics data analyses demonstrate improved predictive and computational performance against state-of-the-art models. Functional selection performance suggests trade-offs exist regarding the effect hierarchy assumption.
△ Less
Submitted 16 May, 2022; v1 submitted 27 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
