Showing 1–5 of 5 results for author: Leonova, M A

One 4-Twist Helix Snake to Maintain Polarization in 8-120 GeV Proton Rings

Authors: F. Antoulinakis, E. A. Ljungman, A. Tai, C. A. Aidala, E. D. Courant, A. D. Krisch, W. Lorenzon, P. D. Myers, R. S. Raymond, D. W. Sivers, M. A. Leonova, Y. S. Derbenev, V. S. Morozov, A. M. Kondratenko

Abstract: Solenoid Siberian snakes have successfully maintained polarization in particle rings below 1 GeV, but never in multi-GeV rings because the Lorentz contraction of a solenoid's integral B dl would require impractically long high-field solenoids. High energy rings, such as Brookhaven's 255 GeV Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC), use only odd multiples of pairs of transverse B-field Siberian snake… ▽ More Solenoid Siberian snakes have successfully maintained polarization in particle rings below 1 GeV, but never in multi-GeV rings because the Lorentz contraction of a solenoid's integral B dl would require impractically long high-field solenoids. High energy rings, such as Brookhaven's 255 GeV Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC), use only odd multiples of pairs of transverse B-field Siberian snakes directly opposite each other. When it became impractical to use a pair of Siberian Snakes in Fermilab's 120 GeV Main Injector, we searched for a new type of single Siberian snake, which should overcome all depolarizing resonances in the 8.9 - 120 GeV range. We found that one snake made of one 4-twist helix and 2 short dipoles could maintain the polarization. This snake design might also be used at other rings, such as Japan's 30 GeV J-PARC, the 12 - 24 GeV NICA proton-deuteron collider at JINR-Dubna, and perhaps RHIC's injector, the 25 GeV AGS. △ Less

Submitted 4 September, 2013; originally announced September 2013.

Comments: 4 pages, 2 figures, 1 table

Journal ref: Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 20, 091003 (2017)

Higher Order Spin Resonances in a 2.1 GeV/c Polarized Proton Beam

Authors: M. A. Leonova, J. A. Askari, K. N. Gordon, A. D. Krisch, J. Liu, V. S. Morozov, D. A. Nees, R. S. Raymond, D. W. Sivers, V. K. Wong, F. Hinterberger

Abstract: Spin resonances can depolarize or spin-flip a polarized beam. We studied 1st and higher order spin resonances with stored 2.1 GeV/c vertically polarized protons. The 1st order vertical (νy) resonance caused almost full spin-flip, while some higher order νy resonances caused partial depolarization. The 1st order horizontal (νx) resonance caused almost full depolarization, while some higher order νx… ▽ More Spin resonances can depolarize or spin-flip a polarized beam. We studied 1st and higher order spin resonances with stored 2.1 GeV/c vertically polarized protons. The 1st order vertical (νy) resonance caused almost full spin-flip, while some higher order νy resonances caused partial depolarization. The 1st order horizontal (νx) resonance caused almost full depolarization, while some higher order νx resonances again caused partial depolarization. Moreover, a 2nd order νx resonance is about as strong as some 3rd order νx resonances, while some 3rd order νy resonances are much stronger than a 2nd order νy resonance. One thought that νy spin resonances are far stronger than νx, and that lower order resonances are stronger than higher order; the data do not support this. △ Less

Submitted 26 April, 2012; originally announced April 2012.

Comments: 5 pages, 5 figures Note that Fig. 5 did not appear in the PRL due to space limitation, but did appear in the March 2012 CERN Courier News Item "Results from SPIN@COSY may bode well for RHIC"

Journal ref: Physical Review Letters 108, 074801 (2012)

Updated Report Acceleration of Polarized Protons to 120-150 GeV/c at Fermilab

Authors: E. D. Courant, A. D. Krisch, M. A. Leonova, A. M. T. Lin, J. Liu, W. Lorenzon, D. A. Nees, R. S. Raymond, D. W. Sivers, V. K. Wong, I. Kourbanis, Ya. S. Derbenev, V. S. Morozov, D. G. Crabb, P. E. Reimer, J. R. O'Fallon, G. Fidecaro, M. Fidecaro, F. Hinterberger, S. M. Troshin, M. N. Ukhanov, A. M. Kondratenko, W. T. H. van Oers

Abstract: The SPIN@FERMI collaboration has updated its 1991-95 Reports on the acceleration of polarized protons in Fermilab's Main Injector, which was commissioned by Fermilab. This Updated Report summarizes some updated Physics Goals for a 120-150 GeV/c polarized proton beam. It also contains an updated discussion of the Modifications and Hardware needed for a polarized beam in the Main Injector, along wit… ▽ More The SPIN@FERMI collaboration has updated its 1991-95 Reports on the acceleration of polarized protons in Fermilab's Main Injector, which was commissioned by Fermilab. This Updated Report summarizes some updated Physics Goals for a 120-150 GeV/c polarized proton beam. It also contains an updated discussion of the Modifications and Hardware needed for a polarized beam in the Main Injector, along with an updated Schedule and Budget. △ Less

Submitted 12 October, 2011; originally announced October 2011.

Comments: 30 pages, 12 figures

Wide spin resonance with an rf-bunched proton beam

Authors: V. S. Morozov, A. W. Chao, A. D. Krisch, M. A. Leonova, J. Liu, R. S. Raymond, D. W. Sivers, V. K. Wong, A. M. Kondratenko

Abstract: We recently used an rf solenoid to study the widths of rf spin resonances with both unbunched and bunched beams of 2.1 GeV_c polarized protons stored in the COSY synchrotron. A map, with unbunched beam at different fixed rf-solenoid frequencies, showed a very shallow possible depolarization dip at the resonance. Next we made frequency sweeps of 400Hz, centered at similar frequencies, which great… ▽ More We recently used an rf solenoid to study the widths of rf spin resonances with both unbunched and bunched beams of 2.1 GeV_c polarized protons stored in the COSY synchrotron. A map, with unbunched beam at different fixed rf-solenoid frequencies, showed a very shallow possible depolarization dip at the resonance. Next we made frequency sweeps of 400Hz, centered at similar frequencies, which greatly enhanced the dip. But, with a bunched proton beam, both the fixed-frequency and frequency-sweep techniques produced similar maps, and both bunched maps showed full beam depolarization over a wide region. Moreover, both were more than twice as wide as the unbunched dip. This widening of the proton resonance due to bunching is exactly opposite to the recently observed narrowing of deuteron resonances due to bunching. △ Less

Submitted 9 January, 2010; originally announced January 2010.

Comments: 3 pages, 2 figures

Spin resonance strengths due to rf solenoids and dipoles for stored deuteron beams

Authors: M. A. Leonova, A. W. Chao, E. D. Courant, A. D. Krisch, V. S. Morozov, R. S. Raymond, D. W. Sivers, J. M. Williams, V. K. Wong, A. Garishvili, R. Gebel, A. Lehrach, B. Lorentz, R. Maier, D. Prasuhn, H. Stockhorst, D. Welsch, F. Hinterberger, K. Ulbrich, Ya. S. Derbenev, A. M. Kondratenko, Y. F. Orlov, E. J. Stephenson, N. P. M. Brantjes, C. J. G. Onderwater , et al. (1 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: This submission was withdrawn because of an unresolved dispute between the authors [arXiv admin 2009-4-13]. This submission was withdrawn because of an unresolved dispute between the authors [arXiv admin 2009-4-13]. △ Less

Submitted 13 April, 2009; v1 submitted 16 January, 2009; originally announced January 2009.

Comments: This submission was withdrawn because of an unresolved dispute between the authors [arXiv admin 2009-4-13]