Radiation and Heat Transport in Divergent Shock-Bubble Interactions
Authors:
Kelin Kurzer-Ogul,
Brian M. Haines,
David S. Montgomery,
Silvia Pandolfi,
Joshua P. Sauppe,
Andrew F. T. Leong,
Daniel Hodge,
Pawel M. Kozlowski,
Stefano Marchesini,
Eric Cunningham,
Eric Galtier,
Dimitri Khaghani,
Hae Ja Lee,
Bob Nagler,
Richard L. Sandberg,
Arianna E. Gleason,
Hussein Aluie,
Jessica K. Shang
Abstract:
Shock-bubble interactions (SBI) are important across a wide range of physical systems. In inertial confinement fusion, interactions between laser-driven shocks and micro-voids in both ablators and foam targets generate instabilities that are a major obstacle in achieving ignition. Experiments imaging the collapse of such voids at high energy densities (HED) are constrained by spatial and temporal…
▽ More
Shock-bubble interactions (SBI) are important across a wide range of physical systems. In inertial confinement fusion, interactions between laser-driven shocks and micro-voids in both ablators and foam targets generate instabilities that are a major obstacle in achieving ignition. Experiments imaging the collapse of such voids at high energy densities (HED) are constrained by spatial and temporal resolution, making simulations a vital tool in understanding these systems. In this study, we benchmark several radiation and thermal transport models in the xRAGE hydrodynamic code against experimental images of a collapsing mesoscale void during the passage of a 300 GPa shock. We also quantitatively examine the role of transport physics in the evolution of the SBI. This allows us to understand the dynamics of the interaction at timescales shorter than experimental imaging framerates. We find that all radiation models examined reproduce empirical shock velocities within experimental error. Radiation transport is found to reduce shock pressures by providing an additional energy pathway in the ablation region, but this effect is small ($\sim$1\% of total shock pressure). Employing a flux-limited Spitzer model for heat conduction, we find that flux limiters between 0.03 and 0.10 produce agreement with experimental velocities, suggesting that the system is well-within the Spitzer regime. Higher heat conduction is found to lower temperatures in the ablated plasma and to prevent secondary shocks at the ablation front, resulting in weaker primary shocks. Finally, we confirm that the SBI-driven instabilities observed in the HED regime are baroclinically driven, as in the low energy case.
△ Less
Submitted 5 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
Ultrafast Radiographic Imaging and Tracking: An overview of instruments, methods, data, and applications
Authors:
Zhehui Wang,
Andrew F. T. Leong,
Angelo Dragone,
Arianna E. Gleason,
Rafael Ballabriga,
Christopher Campbell,
Michael Campbell,
Samuel J. Clark,
Cinzia Da Vià,
Dana M. Dattelbaum,
Marcel Demarteau,
Lorenzo Fabris,
Kamel Fezzaa,
Eric R. Fossum,
Sol M. Gruner,
Todd Hufnagel,
Xiaolu Ju,
Ke Li,
Xavier Llopart,
Bratislav Lukić,
Alexander Rack,
Joseph Strehlow,
Audrey C. Therrien,
Julia Thom-Levy,
Feixiang Wang
, et al. (3 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Ultrafast radiographic imaging and tracking (U-RadIT) use state-of-the-art ionizing particle and light sources to experimentally study sub-nanosecond dynamic processes in physics, chemistry, biology, geology, materials science and other fields. These processes, fundamental to nuclear fusion energy, advanced manufacturing, green transportation and others, often involve one mole or more atoms, and t…
▽ More
Ultrafast radiographic imaging and tracking (U-RadIT) use state-of-the-art ionizing particle and light sources to experimentally study sub-nanosecond dynamic processes in physics, chemistry, biology, geology, materials science and other fields. These processes, fundamental to nuclear fusion energy, advanced manufacturing, green transportation and others, often involve one mole or more atoms, and thus are challenging to compute by using the first principles of quantum physics or other forward models. One of the central problems in U-RadIT is to optimize information yield through, e.g. high-luminosity X-ray and particle sources, efficient imaging and tracking detectors, novel methods to collect data, and large-bandwidth online and offline data processing, regulated by the underlying physics, statistics, and computing power. We review and highlight recent progress in: a.) Detectors; b.) U-RadIT modalities; c.) Data and algorithms; and d.) Applications. Hardware-centric approaches to U-RadIT optimization are constrained by detector material properties, low signal-to-noise ratio, high cost and long development cycles of critical hardware components such as ASICs. Interpretation of experimental data, including comparisons with forward models, is frequently hindered by sparse measurements, model and measurement uncertainties, and noise. Alternatively, U-RadIT make increasing use of data science and machine learning algorithms, including experimental implementations of compressed sensing. Machine learning and artificial intelligence approaches, refined by physics and materials information, may also contribute significantly to data interpretation, uncertainty quantification, and U-RadIT optimization.
△ Less
Submitted 4 September, 2023; v1 submitted 21 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
