Showing 1–17 of 17 results for author: Lenchner, J

On the Number of Quantifiers Needed to Define Boolean Functions

Authors: Marco Carmosino, Ronald Fagin, Neil Immerman, Phokion Kolaitis, Jonathan Lenchner, Rik Sengupta

Abstract: The number of quantifiers needed to express first-order (FO) properties is captured by two-player combinatorial games called multi-structural games. We analyze these games on binary strings with an ordering relation, using a technique we call parallel play, which significantly reduces the number of quantifiers needed in many cases. Ordered structures such as strings have historically been notoriou… ▽ More The number of quantifiers needed to express first-order (FO) properties is captured by two-player combinatorial games called multi-structural games. We analyze these games on binary strings with an ordering relation, using a technique we call parallel play, which significantly reduces the number of quantifiers needed in many cases. Ordered structures such as strings have historically been notoriously difficult to analyze in the context of these and similar games. Nevertheless, in this paper, we provide essentially tight upper bounds on the number of quantifiers needed to characterize different-sized subsets of strings. The results immediately give bounds on the number of quantifiers necessary to define several different classes of Boolean functions. One of our results is analogous to Lupanov's upper bounds on circuit size and formula size in propositional logic: we show that every Boolean function on $n$-bit inputs can be defined by a FO sentence having $(1 + \varepsilon)n\log(n) + O(1)$ quantifiers, and that this is essentially tight. We reduce this number to $(1 + \varepsilon)\log(n) + O(1)$ when the Boolean function in question is sparse. △ Less

Submitted 30 June, 2024; originally announced July 2024.

Comments: To appear in Proceedings of 49th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science, 2024. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2402.10293

A Neuro-Symbolic Approach to Multi-Agent RL for Interpretability and Probabilistic Decision Making

Authors: Chitra Subramanian, Miao Liu, Naweed Khan, Jonathan Lenchner, Aporva Amarnath, Sarathkrishna Swaminathan, Ryan Riegel, Alexander Gray

Abstract: Multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) is well-suited for runtime decision-making in optimizing the performance of systems where multiple agents coexist and compete for shared resources. However, applying common deep learning-based MARL solutions to real-world problems suffers from issues of interpretability, sample efficiency, partial observability, etc. To address these challenges, we present… ▽ More Multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) is well-suited for runtime decision-making in optimizing the performance of systems where multiple agents coexist and compete for shared resources. However, applying common deep learning-based MARL solutions to real-world problems suffers from issues of interpretability, sample efficiency, partial observability, etc. To address these challenges, we present an event-driven formulation, where decision-making is handled by distributed co-operative MARL agents using neuro-symbolic methods. The recently introduced neuro-symbolic Logical Neural Networks (LNN) framework serves as a function approximator for the RL, to train a rules-based policy that is both logical and interpretable by construction. To enable decision-making under uncertainty and partial observability, we developed a novel probabilistic neuro-symbolic framework, Probabilistic Logical Neural Networks (PLNN), which combines the capabilities of logical reasoning with probabilistic graphical models. In PLNN, the upward/downward inference strategy, inherited from LNN, is coupled with belief bounds by setting the activation function for the logical operator associated with each neural network node to a probability-respecting generalization of the Fréchet inequalities. These PLNN nodes form the unifying element that combines probabilistic logic and Bayes Nets, permitting inference for variables with unobserved states. We demonstrate our contributions by addressing key MARL challenges for power sharing in a system-on-chip application. △ Less

Submitted 20 February, 2024; originally announced February 2024.

ACM Class: I.2.6

Parallel Play Saves Quantifiers

Authors: Marco Carmosino, Ronald Fagin, Neil Immerman, Phokion Kolaitis, Jonathan Lenchner, Rik Sengupta, Ryan Williams

Abstract: The number of quantifiers needed to express first-order properties is captured by two-player combinatorial games called multi-structural (MS) games. We play these games on linear orders and strings, and introduce a technique we call "parallel play", that dramatically reduces the number of quantifiers needed in many cases. Linear orders and strings are the most basic representatives of ordered stru… ▽ More The number of quantifiers needed to express first-order properties is captured by two-player combinatorial games called multi-structural (MS) games. We play these games on linear orders and strings, and introduce a technique we call "parallel play", that dramatically reduces the number of quantifiers needed in many cases. Linear orders and strings are the most basic representatives of ordered structures -- a class of structures that has historically been notoriously difficult to analyze. Yet, in this paper, we provide upper bounds on the number of quantifiers needed to characterize different-sized subsets of these structures, and prove that they are tight up to constant factors, including, in some cases, up to a factor of $1+\varepsilon$, for arbitrarily small $\varepsilon$. △ Less

Submitted 4 April, 2024; v1 submitted 15 February, 2024; originally announced February 2024.

Comments: 24 pages, 4 figures

Multi-Structural Games and Beyond

Authors: Marco Carmosino, Ronald Fagin, Neil Immerman, Phokion Kolaitis, Jonathan Lenchner, Rik Sengupta

Abstract: Multi-structural (MS) games are combinatorial games that capture the number of quantifiers of first-order sentences. On the face of their definition, MS games differ from Ehrenfeucht-Fraisse (EF) games in two ways: first, MS games are played on two sets of structures, while EF games are played on a pair of structures; second, in MS games, Duplicator can make any number of copies of structures. In… ▽ More Multi-structural (MS) games are combinatorial games that capture the number of quantifiers of first-order sentences. On the face of their definition, MS games differ from Ehrenfeucht-Fraisse (EF) games in two ways: first, MS games are played on two sets of structures, while EF games are played on a pair of structures; second, in MS games, Duplicator can make any number of copies of structures. In the first part of this paper, we perform a finer analysis of MS games and develop a closer comparison of MS games with EF games. In particular, we point out that the use of sets of structures is of the essence and that when MS games are played on pairs of structures, they capture Boolean combinations of first-order sentences with a fixed number of quantifiers. After this, we focus on another important difference between MS games and EF games, namely, the necessity for Spoiler to play on top of a previous move in order to win some MS games. Via an analysis of the types realized during MS games, we delineate the expressive power of the variant of MS games in which Spoiler never plays on top of a previous move. In the second part we focus on simultaneously capturing number of quantifiers and number of variables in first-order logic. We show that natural variants of the MS game do *not* achieve this. We then introduce a new game, the quantifier-variable tree game, and show that it simultaneously captures the number of quantifiers and number of variables. We conclude by generalizing this game to a family of games, the *syntactic games*, that simultaneously capture reasonable syntactic measures and the number of variables. △ Less

Submitted 23 May, 2023; v1 submitted 30 January, 2023; originally announced January 2023.

Comments: 38 pages

MSC Class: 03B70 ACM Class: F.4.1

Towards a Unification of Logic and Information Theory

Authors: Luis A. Lastras, Barry Trager, Jonathan Lenchner, Wojtek Szpankowski, Chai Wah Wu, Mark Squillante, Alex Gray

Abstract: This article introduces a theory of communication that covers the following generic scenario: Alice knows more than Bob about a certain set of logic propositions and Alice and Bob wish to communicate as efficiently as possible with the shared goal that, following their communication, Bob should be able to deduce a particular logic proposition that Alice knows to be true. We assume that our logic… ▽ More This article introduces a theory of communication that covers the following generic scenario: Alice knows more than Bob about a certain set of logic propositions and Alice and Bob wish to communicate as efficiently as possible with the shared goal that, following their communication, Bob should be able to deduce a particular logic proposition that Alice knows to be true. We assume that our logic system is propositional logic, and we build on top of one of the legendary works in this area, namely the work of Carnap and Bar-Hillel on a theory of semantic information. Our main contribution is a collection of theorems studying various different assumptions on what Alice and Bob know and what their goal is. These theorems all provide sharp upper and lower bounds phrased in terms of an entropy-like function that we call $Λ$, in reference to its apparent connection to problems of communication involving logic. It turns out that when the goal is to communicate only a portion of the knowledge that Alice possesses, the optimum communication cost is lower than most people seem to assume, yet unavoidably, such optimum communication strategies end up allowing Bob to prove even more things than originally intended. Another interesting outcome is that in some scenarios, Alice need not know the logic statements that Bob knows in order to attain asymptotically the same communication efficiency as if she knew the statement, in a nod to the famous Slepian-Wolf and Wyner-Ziv results from source coding theory. Our work also introduces practical codes, which are comprised of a combination of linear codes and enumerative source codes, which turn out to be asymptotically optimal for some scenarios. △ Less

Submitted 16 April, 2024; v1 submitted 25 January, 2023; originally announced January 2023.

On the Number of Quantifiers as a Complexity Measure

Authors: Ronald Fagin, Jonathan Lenchner, Nikhil Vyas, Ryan Williams

Abstract: In 1981, Neil Immerman described a two-player game, which he called the "separability game" \cite{Immerman81}, that captures the number of quantifiers needed to describe a property in first-order logic. Immerman's paper laid the groundwork for studying the number of quantifiers needed to express properties in first-order logic, but the game seemed to be too complicated to study, and the arguments… ▽ More In 1981, Neil Immerman described a two-player game, which he called the "separability game" \cite{Immerman81}, that captures the number of quantifiers needed to describe a property in first-order logic. Immerman's paper laid the groundwork for studying the number of quantifiers needed to express properties in first-order logic, but the game seemed to be too complicated to study, and the arguments of the paper almost exclusively used quantifier rank as a lower bound on the total number of quantifiers. However, last year Fagin, Lenchner, Regan and Vyas rediscovered the games, provided some tools for analyzing them, and showed how to utilize them to characterize the number of quantifiers needed to express linear orders of different sizes. In this paper, we push forward in the study of number of quantifiers as a bona fide complexity measure by establishing several new results. First we carefully distinguish minimum number of quantifiers from the more usual descriptive complexity measures, minimum quantifier rank and minimum number of variables. Then, for each positive integer $k$, we give an explicit example of a property of finite structures (in particular, of finite graphs) that can be expressed with a sentence of quantifier rank $k$, but where the same property needs $2^{Ω(k^2)}$ quantifiers to be expressed. △ Less

Submitted 4 July, 2022; v1 submitted 30 June, 2022; originally announced July 2022.

ACM Class: F.4.1

Combining Fast and Slow Thinking for Human-like and Efficient Navigation in Constrained Environments

Authors: Marianna B. Ganapini, Murray Campbell, Francesco Fabiano, Lior Horesh, Jon Lenchner, Andrea Loreggia, Nicholas Mattei, Taher Rahgooy, Francesca Rossi, Biplav Srivastava, Brent Venable

Abstract: Current AI systems lack several important human capabilities, such as adaptability, generalizability, self-control, consistency, common sense, and causal reasoning. We believe that existing cognitive theories of human decision making, such as the thinking fast and slow theory, can provide insights on how to advance AI systems towards some of these capabilities. In this paper, we propose a general… ▽ More Current AI systems lack several important human capabilities, such as adaptability, generalizability, self-control, consistency, common sense, and causal reasoning. We believe that existing cognitive theories of human decision making, such as the thinking fast and slow theory, can provide insights on how to advance AI systems towards some of these capabilities. In this paper, we propose a general architecture that is based on fast/slow solvers and a metacognitive component. We then present experimental results on the behavior of an instance of this architecture, for AI systems that make decisions about navigating in a constrained environment. We show how combining the fast and slow decision modalities allows the system to evolve over time and gradually pass from slow to fast thinking with enough experience, and that this greatly helps in decision quality, resource consumption, and efficiency. △ Less

Submitted 12 February, 2022; v1 submitted 18 January, 2022; originally announced January 2022.

Comments: arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2110.01834

Thinking Fast and Slow in AI: the Role of Metacognition

Authors: Marianna Bergamaschi Ganapini, Murray Campbell, Francesco Fabiano, Lior Horesh, Jon Lenchner, Andrea Loreggia, Nicholas Mattei, Francesca Rossi, Biplav Srivastava, Kristen Brent Venable

Abstract: AI systems have seen dramatic advancement in recent years, bringing many applications that pervade our everyday life. However, we are still mostly seeing instances of narrow AI: many of these recent developments are typically focused on a very limited set of competencies and goals, e.g., image interpretation, natural language processing, classification, prediction, and many others. Moreover, while… ▽ More AI systems have seen dramatic advancement in recent years, bringing many applications that pervade our everyday life. However, we are still mostly seeing instances of narrow AI: many of these recent developments are typically focused on a very limited set of competencies and goals, e.g., image interpretation, natural language processing, classification, prediction, and many others. Moreover, while these successes can be accredited to improved algorithms and techniques, they are also tightly linked to the availability of huge datasets and computational power. State-of-the-art AI still lacks many capabilities that would naturally be included in a notion of (human) intelligence. We argue that a better study of the mechanisms that allow humans to have these capabilities can help us understand how to imbue AI systems with these competencies. We focus especially on D. Kahneman's theory of thinking fast and slow, and we propose a multi-agent AI architecture where incoming problems are solved by either system 1 (or "fast") agents, that react by exploiting only past experience, or by system 2 (or "slow") agents, that are deliberately activated when there is the need to reason and search for optimal solutions beyond what is expected from the system 1 agent. Both kinds of agents are supported by a model of the world, containing domain knowledge about the environment, and a model of "self", containing information about past actions of the system and solvers' skills. △ Less

Submitted 5 October, 2021; originally announced October 2021.

E-PDDL: A Standardized Way of Defining Epistemic Planning Problems

Authors: Francesco Fabiano, Biplav Srivastava, Jonathan Lenchner, Lior Horesh, Francesca Rossi, Marianna Bergamaschi Ganapini

Abstract: Epistemic Planning (EP) refers to an automated planning setting where the agent reasons in the space of knowledge states and tries to find a plan to reach a desirable state from the current state. Its general form, the Multi-agent Epistemic Planning (MEP) problem involves multiple agents who need to reason about both the state of the world and the information flow between agents. In a MEP problem,… ▽ More Epistemic Planning (EP) refers to an automated planning setting where the agent reasons in the space of knowledge states and tries to find a plan to reach a desirable state from the current state. Its general form, the Multi-agent Epistemic Planning (MEP) problem involves multiple agents who need to reason about both the state of the world and the information flow between agents. In a MEP problem, multiple approaches have been developed recently with varying restrictions, such as considering only the concept of knowledge while not allowing the idea of belief, or not allowing for ``complex" modal operators such as those needed to handle dynamic common knowledge. While the diversity of approaches has led to a deeper understanding of the problem space, the lack of a standardized way to specify MEP problems independently of solution approaches has created difficulties in comparing performance of planners, identifying promising techniques, exploring new strategies like ensemble methods, and making it easy for new researchers to contribute to this research area. To address the situation, we propose a unified way of specifying EP problems - the Epistemic Planning Domain Definition Language, E-PDDL. We show that E-PPDL can be supported by leading MEP planners and provide corresponding parser code that translates EP problems specified in E-PDDL into (M)EP problems that can be handled by several planners. This work is also useful in building more general epistemic planning environments where we envision a meta-cognitive module that takes a planning problem in E-PDDL, identifies and assesses some of its features, and autonomously decides which planner is the best one to solve it. △ Less

Submitted 19 July, 2021; originally announced July 2021.

Comments: 9 pages, Knowledge Engineering for Planning and Scheduling - ICAPS 2021

Multi-Structural Games and Number of Quantifiers

Authors: Ronald Fagin, Jonathan Lenchner, Kenneth W. Regan, Nikhil Vyas

Abstract: We study multi-structural games, played on two sets $\mathcal{A}$ and $\mathcal{B}$ of structures. These games generalize Ehrenfeucht-Fraïssé games. Whereas Ehrenfeucht-Fraïssé games capture the quantifier rank of a first-order sentence, multi-structural games capture the number of quantifiers, in the sense that Spoiler wins the $r$-round game if and only if there is a first-order sentence $φ$ wit… ▽ More We study multi-structural games, played on two sets $\mathcal{A}$ and $\mathcal{B}$ of structures. These games generalize Ehrenfeucht-Fraïssé games. Whereas Ehrenfeucht-Fraïssé games capture the quantifier rank of a first-order sentence, multi-structural games capture the number of quantifiers, in the sense that Spoiler wins the $r$-round game if and only if there is a first-order sentence $φ$ with at most $r$ quantifiers, where every structure in $\mathcal{A}$ satisfies $φ$ and no structure in $\mathcal{B}$ satisfies $φ$. We use these games to give a complete characterization of the number of quantifiers required to distinguish linear orders of different sizes, and develop machinery for analyzing structures beyond linear orders. △ Less

Submitted 3 March, 2022; v1 submitted 29 April, 2021; originally announced April 2021.

Comments: Appeared in LICS 2021

Thinking Fast and Slow in AI

Authors: Grady Booch, Francesco Fabiano, Lior Horesh, Kiran Kate, Jon Lenchner, Nick Linck, Andrea Loreggia, Keerthiram Murugesan, Nicholas Mattei, Francesca Rossi, Biplav Srivastava

Abstract: This paper proposes a research direction to advance AI which draws inspiration from cognitive theories of human decision making. The premise is that if we gain insights about the causes of some human capabilities that are still lacking in AI (for instance, adaptability, generalizability, common sense, and causal reasoning), we may obtain similar capabilities in an AI system by embedding these caus… ▽ More This paper proposes a research direction to advance AI which draws inspiration from cognitive theories of human decision making. The premise is that if we gain insights about the causes of some human capabilities that are still lacking in AI (for instance, adaptability, generalizability, common sense, and causal reasoning), we may obtain similar capabilities in an AI system by embedding these causal components. We hope that the high-level description of our vision included in this paper, as well as the several research questions that we propose to consider, can stimulate the AI research community to define, try and evaluate new methodologies, frameworks, and evaluation metrics, in the spirit of achieving a better understanding of both human and machine intelligence. △ Less

Submitted 15 December, 2020; v1 submitted 12 October, 2020; originally announced October 2020.

Journal ref: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2021, 35(17), 15042-15046

A Finitist's Manifesto: Do we need to Reformulate the Foundations of Mathematics?

Authors: Jonathan Lenchner

Abstract: There is a problem with the foundations of classical mathematics, and potentially even with the foundations of computer science, that mathematicians have by-and-large ignored. This essay is a call for practicing mathematicians who have been sleep-walking in their infinitary mathematical paradise to take heed. Much of mathematics relies upon either (i) the "existence'" of objects that contain an in… ▽ More There is a problem with the foundations of classical mathematics, and potentially even with the foundations of computer science, that mathematicians have by-and-large ignored. This essay is a call for practicing mathematicians who have been sleep-walking in their infinitary mathematical paradise to take heed. Much of mathematics relies upon either (i) the "existence'" of objects that contain an infinite number of elements, (ii) our ability, "in theory", to compute with an arbitrary level of precision, or (iii) our ability, "in theory", to compute for an arbitrarily large number of time steps. All of calculus relies on the notion of a limit. The monumental results of real and complex analysis rely on a seamless notion of the "continuum" of real numbers, which extends in the plane to the complex numbers and gives us, among other things, "rigorous" definitions of continuity, the derivative, various different integrals, as well as the fundamental theorems of calculus and of algebra -- the former of which says that the derivative and integral can be viewed as inverse operations, and the latter of which says that every polynomial over $\mathbb{C}$ has a complex root. This essay is an inquiry into whether there is any way to assign meaning to the notions of "existence" and "in theory'" in (i) to (iii) above. △ Less

Submitted 14 September, 2020; originally announced September 2020.

MSC Class: 03A05 ACM Class: F.4.0

On a Generalization of the Marriage Problem

Authors: Jonathan Lenchner

Abstract: We present a generalization of the marriage problem underlying Hall's famous Marriage Theorem to what we call the Symmetric Marriage Problem, a problem that can be thought of as a special case of Maximal Weighted Bipartite Matching. We show that there is a solution to the Symmetric Marriage Problem if and only if a variation on Hall's Condition holds on each of the bipartitions. We prove both fini… ▽ More We present a generalization of the marriage problem underlying Hall's famous Marriage Theorem to what we call the Symmetric Marriage Problem, a problem that can be thought of as a special case of Maximal Weighted Bipartite Matching. We show that there is a solution to the Symmetric Marriage Problem if and only if a variation on Hall's Condition holds on each of the bipartitions. We prove both finite and infinite versions of this result and provide applications. We also introduce a non-bipartite version of the problem and show that a generalization of Tutte's Theorem applies. △ Less

Submitted 18 January, 2020; v1 submitted 12 July, 2019; originally announced July 2019.

MSC Class: 05C70

From Hall's Marriage Theorem to Boolean Satisfiability and Back

Authors: Jonathan Lenchner

Abstract: Motivated by the application of Hall's Marriage Theorem in various LP-rounding problems, we introduce a generalization of the classical marriage problem (CMP) that we call the Fractional Marriage Problem. We show that the Fractional Marriage Problem is NP-Complete by reduction from Boolean Satisfiability (SAT). We show that when we view the classical marriage problem (a.k.a. bipartite matching) as… ▽ More Motivated by the application of Hall's Marriage Theorem in various LP-rounding problems, we introduce a generalization of the classical marriage problem (CMP) that we call the Fractional Marriage Problem. We show that the Fractional Marriage Problem is NP-Complete by reduction from Boolean Satisfiability (SAT). We show that when we view the classical marriage problem (a.k.a. bipartite matching) as a sub-class of SAT we get a new class of polynomial-time satisfiable SAT instances that we call CMP-SAT, different from the classically known polynomial-time satisfiable SAT instances 2-SAT, Horn-SAT and XOR-SAT. We next turn to the problem of recognizing CMP-SAT instances, first using SAT embeddings, and then using their embeddings within the universe of Fractional Marriage Problems (FMPs). In the process we are led to another generalization of the CMP that we call the Symmetric Marriage Problem, which is polynomial time decidable and leads to a slight enlargement of the CMP-SAT class. We develop a framework for simplifying FMP problems to identify CMP instances that we call Fragment Logic. Finally we give a result that sheds light on how expressive the FMP need be to still be NP-Complete. The result gives a second NP-Complete reduction of the FMP, this time to Tripartite Matching. We conclude with a wide assortment of suggested additional problems. △ Less

Submitted 7 May, 2019; v1 submitted 15 April, 2019; originally announced April 2019.

Comments: Corrected FOCS 2019 Submission

Analysis of Watson's Strategies for Playing Jeopardy!

Authors: Gerald Tesauro, David C. Gondek, Jonathan Lenchner, James Fan, John M. Prager

Abstract: Major advances in Question Answering technology were needed for IBM Watson to play Jeopardy! at championship level -- the show requires rapid-fire answers to challenging natural language questions, broad general knowledge, high precision, and accurate confidence estimates. In addition, Jeopardy! features four types of decision making carrying great strategic importance: (1) Daily Double wagering;… ▽ More Major advances in Question Answering technology were needed for IBM Watson to play Jeopardy! at championship level -- the show requires rapid-fire answers to challenging natural language questions, broad general knowledge, high precision, and accurate confidence estimates. In addition, Jeopardy! features four types of decision making carrying great strategic importance: (1) Daily Double wagering; (2) Final Jeopardy wagering; (3) selecting the next square when in control of the board; (4) deciding whether to attempt to answer, i.e., "buzz in." Using sophisticated strategies for these decisions, that properly account for the game state and future event probabilities, can significantly boost a players overall chances to win, when compared with simple "rule of thumb" strategies. This article presents our approach to develo** Watsons game-playing strategies, comprising development of a faithful simulation model, and then using learning and Monte-Carlo methods within the simulator to optimize Watsons strategic decision-making. After giving a detailed description of each of our game-strategy algorithms, we then focus in particular on validating the accuracy of the simulators predictions, and documenting performance improvements using our methods. Quantitative performance benefits are shown with respect to both simple heuristic strategies, and actual human contestant performance in historical episodes. We further extend our analysis of human play to derive a number of valuable and counterintuitive examples illustrating how human contestants may improve their performance on the show. △ Less

Submitted 3 February, 2014; originally announced February 2014.

Journal ref: Journal Of Artificial Intelligence Research, Volume 47, pages 205-251, 2013

Connectivity graphs of uncertainty regions

Authors: Erin Chambers, Alejandro Erickson, Sándor Fekete, Jonathan Lenchner, Jeff Sember, Venkatesh Srinivasan, Ulrike Stege, Svetlana Stolpner, Christophe Weibel, Sue Whitesides

Abstract: We study connectivity relations among points, where the precise location of each input point lies in a region of uncertainty. We distinguish two fundamental scenarios under which uncertainty arises. In the favorable Best-Case Uncertainty (BU), each input point can be chosen from a given set to yield the best possible objective value. In the unfavorable Worst-Case Uncertainty (WU), the input set ha… ▽ More We study connectivity relations among points, where the precise location of each input point lies in a region of uncertainty. We distinguish two fundamental scenarios under which uncertainty arises. In the favorable Best-Case Uncertainty (BU), each input point can be chosen from a given set to yield the best possible objective value. In the unfavorable Worst-Case Uncertainty (WU), the input set has worst possible objective value among all possible point locations, which are uncertain due, for example, to imprecise data. We consider these notions of uncertainty for the bottleneck spanning tree problem, giving rise to the following Best-Case Connectivity with Uncertainty (BCU) problem: Given a family of geometric regions, choose one point per region, such that the longest edge length of an associated geometric spanning tree is minimized. We show that this problem is NP-hard even for very simple scenarios in which the regions are line segments or squares. On the other hand, we give an exact solution for the case in which there are n+k regions, where k of the regions are line segments and n of the regions are fixed points. We then give approximation algorithms for cases where the regions are either all line segments or all unit discs. We also provide approximation methods for the corresponding Worst-Case Connectivity with Uncertainty (WCU) problem: Given a set of uncertainty regions, find the minimal distance r such that for any choice of points, one per region, there is a spanning tree among the points with edge length at most r. △ Less

Submitted 31 December, 2016; v1 submitted 17 September, 2010; originally announced September 2010.

Comments: 29 pages, 15 figures, full version of extended abstract that appeared in ISAAC 2010. (Modification: polished and greatly revised version.)

ACM Class: F.2.2

Minimum-Cost Coverage of Point Sets by Disks

Authors: Esther M. Arkin, Herve Broennimann, Jeff Erickson, Sandor P. Fekete, Christian Knauer, Jonathan Lenchner, Joseph S. B. Mitchell, Kim Whittlesey

Abstract: We consider a class of geometric facility location problems in which the goal is to determine a set X of disks given by their centers (t_j) and radii (r_j) that cover a given set of demand points Y in the plane at the smallest possible cost. We consider cost functions of the form sum_j f(r_j), where f(r)=r^alpha is the cost of transmission to radius r. Special cases arise for alpha=1 (sum of rad… ▽ More We consider a class of geometric facility location problems in which the goal is to determine a set X of disks given by their centers (t_j) and radii (r_j) that cover a given set of demand points Y in the plane at the smallest possible cost. We consider cost functions of the form sum_j f(r_j), where f(r)=r^alpha is the cost of transmission to radius r. Special cases arise for alpha=1 (sum of radii) and alpha=2 (total area); power consumption models in wireless network design often use an exponent alpha>2. Different scenarios arise according to possible restrictions on the transmission centers t_j, which may be constrained to belong to a given discrete set or to lie on a line, etc. We obtain several new results, including (a) exact and approximation algorithms for selecting transmission points t_j on a given line in order to cover demand points Y in the plane; (b) approximation algorithms (and an algebraic intractability result) for selecting an optimal line on which to place transmission points to cover Y; (c) a proof of NP-hardness for a discrete set of transmission points in the plane and any fixed alpha>1; and (d) a polynomial-time approximation scheme for the problem of computing a minimum cost covering tour (MCCT), in which the total cost is a linear combination of the transmission cost for the set of disks and the length of a tour/path that connects the centers of the disks. △ Less

Submitted 4 April, 2006; originally announced April 2006.

Comments: 10 pages, 4 figures, Latex, to appear in ACM Symposium on Computational Geometry 2006

ACM Class: F.2.2