-
Domain-Centered Support for Layout, Tasks, and Specification for Control Flow Graph Visualization
Authors:
Sabin Devkota,
Matthew P. LeGendre,
Adam Kunen,
Pascal Aschwanden,
Katherine E. Isaacs
Abstract:
Computing professionals in areas like compilers, performance analysis, and security often analyze and manipulate control flow graphs (CFGs) in their work. CFGs are directed networks that describe possible orderings of instructions in the execution of a program. Visualizing a CFG is a common activity in develo** or debugging computational approaches that use them. However, general graph drawing l…
▽ More
Computing professionals in areas like compilers, performance analysis, and security often analyze and manipulate control flow graphs (CFGs) in their work. CFGs are directed networks that describe possible orderings of instructions in the execution of a program. Visualizing a CFG is a common activity in develo** or debugging computational approaches that use them. However, general graph drawing layouts, including the hierarchical ones frequently applied to CFGs, do not capture CFG-specific structures or tasks and thus the resulting drawing may not match the needs of their audience, especially for more complicated programs. While several algorithms offer flexibility in specifying the layout, they often require expertise with graph drawing layouts and primitives that these potential users do not have. To bring domain-specific CFG drawing to this audience, we develop CFGConf, a library designed to match the abstraction level of CFG experts. CFGConf provides a JSON interface that produces drawings that can stand-alone or be integrated into multi-view visualization systems. We developed CFGConf through an interactive design process with experts while incorporating lessons learned from previous CFG visualization systems, a survey of CFG drawing conventions in computing systems conferences, and existing design principles for notations. We evaluate CFGConf in terms of expressiveness, usability, and notational efficiency through a user study and illustrative examples. CFG experts were able to use the library to produce the domain-aware layouts and appreciated the task-aware nature of the specification.
△ Less
Submitted 25 September, 2022; v1 submitted 6 August, 2021;
originally announced August 2021.
-
CcNav: Understanding Compiler Optimizations in Binary Code
Authors:
Sabin Devkota,
Pascal Aschwanden,
Adam Kunen,
Matthew Legendre,
Katherine E. Isaacs
Abstract:
Program developers spend significant time on optimizing and tuning programs. During this iterative process, they apply optimizations, analyze the resulting code, and modify the compilation until they are satisfied. Understanding what the compiler did with the code is crucial to this process but is very time-consuming and labor-intensive. Users need to navigate through thousands of lines of binary…
▽ More
Program developers spend significant time on optimizing and tuning programs. During this iterative process, they apply optimizations, analyze the resulting code, and modify the compilation until they are satisfied. Understanding what the compiler did with the code is crucial to this process but is very time-consuming and labor-intensive. Users need to navigate through thousands of lines of binary code and correlate it to source code concepts to understand the results of the compilation and to identify optimizations. We present a design study in collaboration with program developers and performance analysts. Our collaborators work with various artifacts related to the program such as binary code, source code, control flow graphs, and call graphs. Through interviews, feedback, and pair-analytics sessions, we analyzed their tasks and workflow. Based on this task analysis and through a human-centric design process, we designed a visual analytics system Compilation Navigator (CcNav) to aid exploration of the effects of compiler optimizations on the program. CcNav provides a streamlined workflow and a unified context that integrates disparate artifacts. CcNav supports consistent interactions across all the artifacts making it easy to correlate binary code with source code concepts. CcNav enables users to navigate and filter large binary code to identify and summarize optimizations such as inlining, vectorization, loop unrolling, and code hoisting. We evaluate CcNav through guided sessions and semi-structured interviews. We reflect on our design process, particularly the immersive elements, and on the transferability of design studies through our experience with a previous design study on program analysis.
△ Less
Submitted 7 November, 2020; v1 submitted 2 September, 2020;
originally announced September 2020.
-
The Physics of the B Factories
Authors:
A. J. Bevan,
B. Golob,
Th. Mannel,
S. Prell,
B. D. Yabsley,
K. Abe,
H. Aihara,
F. Anulli,
N. Arnaud,
T. Aushev,
M. Beneke,
J. Beringer,
F. Bianchi,
I. I. Bigi,
M. Bona,
N. Brambilla,
J. B rodzicka,
P. Chang,
M. J. Charles,
C. H. Cheng,
H. -Y. Cheng,
R. Chistov,
P. Colangelo,
J. P. Coleman,
A. Drutskoy
, et al. (2009 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This work is on the Physics of the B Factories. Part A of this book contains a brief description of the SLAC and KEK B Factories as well as their detectors, BaBar and Belle, and data taking related issues. Part B discusses tools and methods used by the experiments in order to obtain results. The results themselves can be found in Part C.
Please note that version 3 on the archive is the auxiliary…
▽ More
This work is on the Physics of the B Factories. Part A of this book contains a brief description of the SLAC and KEK B Factories as well as their detectors, BaBar and Belle, and data taking related issues. Part B discusses tools and methods used by the experiments in order to obtain results. The results themselves can be found in Part C.
Please note that version 3 on the archive is the auxiliary version of the Physics of the B Factories book. This uses the notation alpha, beta, gamma for the angles of the Unitarity Triangle. The nominal version uses the notation phi_1, phi_2 and phi_3. Please cite this work as Eur. Phys. J. C74 (2014) 3026.
△ Less
Submitted 31 October, 2015; v1 submitted 24 June, 2014;
originally announced June 2014.
-
Expected Performance of the ATLAS Experiment - Detector, Trigger and Physics
Authors:
The ATLAS Collaboration,
G. Aad,
E. Abat,
B. Abbott,
J. Abdallah,
A. A. Abdelalim,
A. Abdesselam,
O. Abdinov,
B. Abi,
M. Abolins,
H. Abramowicz,
B. S. Acharya,
D. L. Adams,
T. N. Addy,
C. Adorisio,
P. Adragna,
T. Adye,
J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra,
M. Aharrouche,
S. P. Ahlen,
F. Ahles,
A. Ahmad,
H. Ahmed,
G. Aielli,
T. Akdogan
, et al. (2587 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
A detailed study is presented of the expected performance of the ATLAS detector. The reconstruction of tracks, leptons, photons, missing energy and jets is investigated, together with the performance of b-tagging and the trigger. The physics potential for a variety of interesting physics processes, within the Standard Model and beyond, is examined. The study comprises a series of notes based on…
▽ More
A detailed study is presented of the expected performance of the ATLAS detector. The reconstruction of tracks, leptons, photons, missing energy and jets is investigated, together with the performance of b-tagging and the trigger. The physics potential for a variety of interesting physics processes, within the Standard Model and beyond, is examined. The study comprises a series of notes based on simulations of the detector and physics processes, with particular emphasis given to the data expected from the first years of operation of the LHC at CERN.
△ Less
Submitted 14 August, 2009; v1 submitted 28 December, 2008;
originally announced January 2009.
