Spatial Stochastic Modeling with MCell and CellBlender
Authors:
Sanjana Gupta,
Jacob Czech,
Robert Kuczewski,
Thomas M. Bartol,
Terrence J. Sejnowski,
Robin E. C. Lee,
James R. Faeder
Abstract:
This chapter provides a brief introduction to the theory and practice of spatial stochastic simulations. It begins with an overview of different methods available for biochemical simulations highlighting their strengths and limitations. Spatial stochastic modeling approaches are indicated when diffusion is relatively slow and spatial inhomogeneities involve relatively small numbers of particles. T…
▽ More
This chapter provides a brief introduction to the theory and practice of spatial stochastic simulations. It begins with an overview of different methods available for biochemical simulations highlighting their strengths and limitations. Spatial stochastic modeling approaches are indicated when diffusion is relatively slow and spatial inhomogeneities involve relatively small numbers of particles. The popular software package MCell allows particle-based stochastic simulations of biochemical systems in complex three dimensional (3D) geometries, which are important for many cell biology applications. Here, we provide an overview of the simulation algorithms used by MCell and the underlying theory. We then give a tutorial on building and simulating MCell models using the CellBlender graphical user interface, that is built as a plug-in to Blender, a widely-used and freely available software platform for 3D modeling. The tutorial starts with simple models that demonstrate basic MCell functionality and then advances to a number of more complex examples that demonstrate a range of features and provide examples of important biophysical effects that require spatially-resolved stochastic dynamics to capture.
△ Less
Submitted 30 September, 2018;
originally announced October 2018.
Evaluation of Parallel Tempering to Accelerate Bayesian Parameter Estimation in Systems Biology
Authors:
Sanjana Gupta,
Liam Hainsworth,
Justin S. Hogg,
Robin E. C. Lee,
James R. Faeder
Abstract:
Models of biological systems often have many unknown parameters that must be determined in order for model behavior to match experimental observations. Commonly-used methods for parameter estimation that return point estimates of the best-fit parameters are insufficient when models are high dimensional and under-constrained. As a result, Bayesian methods, which treat model parameters as random var…
▽ More
Models of biological systems often have many unknown parameters that must be determined in order for model behavior to match experimental observations. Commonly-used methods for parameter estimation that return point estimates of the best-fit parameters are insufficient when models are high dimensional and under-constrained. As a result, Bayesian methods, which treat model parameters as random variables and attempt to estimate their probability distributions given data, have become popular in systems biology. Bayesian parameter estimation often relies on Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods to sample model parameter distributions, but the slow convergence of MCMC sampling can be a major bottleneck. One approach to improving performance is parallel tempering (PT), a physics-based method that uses swap** between multiple Markov chains run in parallel at different temperatures to accelerate sampling. The temperature of a Markov chain determines the probability of accepting an unfavorable move, so swap** with higher temperatures chains enables the sampling chain to escape from local minima. In this work we compared the MCMC performance of PT and the commonly-used Metropolis-Hastings (MH) algorithm on six biological models of varying complexity. We found that for simpler models PT accelerated convergence and sampling, and that for more complex models, PT often converged in cases MH became trapped in non-optimal local minima. We also developed a freely-available MATLAB package for Bayesian parameter estimation called PTempEst (http://github.com/RuleWorld/ptempest), which is closely integrated with the popular BioNetGen software for rule-based modeling of biological systems.
△ Less
Submitted 29 January, 2018;
originally announced January 2018.
