-
New Observations Needed to Advance Our Understanding of Coronal Mass Ejections
Authors:
Erika Palmerio,
Benjamin J. Lynch,
Christina O. Lee,
Lan K. Jian,
Teresa Nieves-Chinchilla,
Emma E. Davies,
Brian E. Wood,
Noé Lugaz,
Réka M. Winslow,
Tibor Török,
Nada Al-Haddad,
Florian Regnault,
Meng **,
Camilla Scolini,
Fernando Carcaboso,
Charles J. Farrugia,
Vincent E. Ledvina,
Cooper Downs,
Christina Kay,
Sanchita Pal,
Tarik M. Salman,
Robert C. Allen
Abstract:
Coronal mass ejections (CMEs) are large eruptions from the Sun that propagate through the heliosphere after launch. Observational studies of these transient phenomena are usually based on 2D images of the Sun, corona, and heliosphere (remote-sensing data), as well as magnetic field, plasma, and particle samples along a 1D spacecraft trajectory (in-situ data). Given the large scales involved and th…
▽ More
Coronal mass ejections (CMEs) are large eruptions from the Sun that propagate through the heliosphere after launch. Observational studies of these transient phenomena are usually based on 2D images of the Sun, corona, and heliosphere (remote-sensing data), as well as magnetic field, plasma, and particle samples along a 1D spacecraft trajectory (in-situ data). Given the large scales involved and the 3D nature of CMEs, such measurements are generally insufficient to build a comprehensive picture, especially in terms of local variations and overall geometry of the whole structure. This White Paper aims to address this issue by identifying the data sets and observational priorities that are needed to effectively advance our current understanding of the structure and evolution of CMEs, in both the remote-sensing and in-situ regimes. It also provides an outlook of possible missions and instruments that may yield significant improvements into the subject.
△ Less
Submitted 11 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
-
Modeling CME encounters at Parker Solar Probe with OSPREI: Dependence on photospheric and coronal conditions
Authors:
Vincent E. Ledvina,
Erika Palmerio,
Christina Kay,
Nada Al-Haddad,
Pete Riley
Abstract:
Context: Coronal mass ejections (CMEs) are eruptions of plasma from the Sun that travel through interplanetary space and may encounter Earth. CMEs often enclose a magnetic flux rope (MFR), the orientation of which largely determines the CME's geoeffectiveness. Current operational CME models do not model MFRs, but a number of research ones do, including the Open Solar Physics Rapid Ensemble Informa…
▽ More
Context: Coronal mass ejections (CMEs) are eruptions of plasma from the Sun that travel through interplanetary space and may encounter Earth. CMEs often enclose a magnetic flux rope (MFR), the orientation of which largely determines the CME's geoeffectiveness. Current operational CME models do not model MFRs, but a number of research ones do, including the Open Solar Physics Rapid Ensemble Information (OSPREI) model. Aims: We report the sensitivity of OSPREI to a range of user-selected photospheric and coronal conditions. Methods: We model four separate CMEs observed in situ by Parker Solar Probe (PSP). We vary the input photospheric conditions using four input magnetograms (HMI Synchronic, HMI Synoptic, GONG Synoptic Zero-Point Corrected, and GONG ADAPT). To vary the coronal field reconstruction, we employ the Potential-Field Source-Surface (PFSS) model and we vary its source-surface height in the range 1.5--3.0 R$_{\odot}$ with 0.1 R$_{\odot}$ increments. Results: We find that both the input magnetogram and PFSS source surface often affect the evolution of the CME as it propagates through the Sun's corona into interplanetary space, and therefore the accuracy of the MFR prediction compared to in-situ data at PSP. There is no obvious best combination of input magnetogram and PFSS source surface height. Conclusions: The OSPREI model is moderately sensitive to the input photospheric and coronal conditions. Based on where the source region of the CME is located on the Sun, there may be best practices when selecting an input magnetogram to use.
△ Less
Submitted 19 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
-
Quantifying Properties of Photospheric Magnetic Cancellations in the Quiet Sun Internetwork
Authors:
Vincent E. Ledvina,
Maria D. Kazachenko,
Serena Criscuoli,
Dennis Tilipman,
Ilaria Ermolli,
Mariachiara Falco,
Salvatore Guglielmino,
Shahin Jafarzadeh,
Luc Rouppe van der Voort,
Francesca Zuccarello
Abstract:
We analyzed spectropolarimetric data from the Swedish 1-meter Solar Telescope to investigate physical properties of small-scale magnetic cancellations in the quiet Sun photosphere. Specifically, we looked at the full Stokes polarization profiles along the Fe I 557.6 nm and of the Fe I 630.1 nm lines measured by CRisp Imaging SpectroPolarimeter (CRISP) to study temporal evolution of the line-of-sig…
▽ More
We analyzed spectropolarimetric data from the Swedish 1-meter Solar Telescope to investigate physical properties of small-scale magnetic cancellations in the quiet Sun photosphere. Specifically, we looked at the full Stokes polarization profiles along the Fe I 557.6 nm and of the Fe I 630.1 nm lines measured by CRisp Imaging SpectroPolarimeter (CRISP) to study temporal evolution of the line-of-sight (LOS) magnetic field during 42.5 minutes of quiet Sun evolution. From this magnetogram sequence, we visually identified 38 cancellation events. We then used Yet Another Feature Tracking Algorithm (YAFTA) to characterize physical properties of these magnetic cancellations. We found on average $1.6\times10^{16}$ Mx of magnetic flux cancelled in each event with an average cancellation rate of $3.8\times10^{14}$ Mx s$^{-1}$. The derived cancelled flux is associated with strong downflows, with an average speed of $V_\mathrm{LOS}\approx1.1$ km s$^{-1}$. Our results show that the average lifetime of each event is $9.2$ minutes with an average $44.8\%$ of initial magnetic flux being cancelled. Our estimates of magnetic fluxes provide a lower limit since studied magnetic cancellation events have magnetic field values that are very close to the instrument noise level. We observed no horizontal magnetic fields at the cancellation sites and therefore can not conclude whether the events are associated structures that could cause magnetic reconnection.
△ Less
Submitted 9 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
