Data Management Plans: the Importance of Data Management in the BIG-MAP Project
Authors:
Ivano E. Castelli,
Daniel J. Arismendi-Arrieta,
Arghya Bhowmik,
Isidora Cekic-Laskovic,
Simon Clark,
Robert Dominko,
Eibar Flores,
Jackson Flowers,
Karina Ulvskov Frederiksen,
Jesper Friis,
Alexis Grimaud,
Karin Vels Hansen,
Laurence J. Hardwick,
Kersti Hermansson,
Lukas Königer,
Hanne Lauritzen,
Frédéric Le Cras,
Hongjiao Li,
Sandrine Lyonnard,
Henning Lorrmann,
Nicola Marzari,
Leszek Niedzicki,
Giovanni Pizzi,
Fuzhan Rahmanian,
Helge Stein
, et al. (5 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Open access to research data is increasingly important for accelerating research. Grant authorities therefore request detailed plans for how data is managed in the projects they finance. We have recently developed such a plan for the EU-H2020 BIG-MAP project - a cross-disciplinary project targeting disruptive battery-material discoveries. Essential for reaching the goal is extensive sharing of res…
▽ More
Open access to research data is increasingly important for accelerating research. Grant authorities therefore request detailed plans for how data is managed in the projects they finance. We have recently developed such a plan for the EU-H2020 BIG-MAP project - a cross-disciplinary project targeting disruptive battery-material discoveries. Essential for reaching the goal is extensive sharing of research data across scales, disciplines and stakeholders, not limited to BIG-MAP and the European BATTERY 2030+ initiative but within the entire battery community. The key challenges faced in develo** the data management plan for such a large and complex project were to generate an overview of the enormous amount of data that will be produced, to build an understanding of the data flow within the project and to agree on a roadmap for making all data FAIR. This paper describes the process we followed and how we structured the plan.
△ Less
Submitted 3 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
Recent progress and review of issues related to Physics Dynamics Coupling in geophysical models
Authors:
Markus Gross,
Hui Wan,
Philip J. Rasch,
Peter M. Caldwell,
David L. Williamson,
Daniel Klocke,
Christiane Jablonowski,
Diana R. Thatcher,
Nigel Wood,
Mike Cullen,
Bob Beare,
Martin Willett,
Florian Lemarié,
Eric Blayo,
Sylvie Malardel,
Piet Termonia,
Almut Gassmann,
Peter H. Lauritzen,
Hans Johansen,
Colin M. Zarzycki,
Koichi Sakaguchi,
Ruby Leung
Abstract:
Geophysical models of the atmosphere and ocean invariably involve parameterizations. These represent two distinct areas: Subgrid processes that the model cannot resolve, and diabatic sources in the equations, due to radiation for example. Hence, coupling between these physics parameterizations and the resolved fluid dynamics and also between the dynamics of the air and water, is necessary. In this…
▽ More
Geophysical models of the atmosphere and ocean invariably involve parameterizations. These represent two distinct areas: Subgrid processes that the model cannot resolve, and diabatic sources in the equations, due to radiation for example. Hence, coupling between these physics parameterizations and the resolved fluid dynamics and also between the dynamics of the air and water, is necessary. In this paper weather and climate models are used to illustrate the problems. Nevertheless the same applies to other geophysical models. This coupling is an important aspect of geophysical models. However, often model development is strictly segregated into either physics or dynamics. As a consequence, this area has many unanswered questions. Recent developments in the design of dynamical cores, extended process physics and predicted future changes of the computational infrastructure are increasing complexity. This paper reviews the state-of-the-art of the physics-dynamics coupling in geophysical models, surveys the analysis techniques, and illustrates open questions in this field. This paper focuses on two objectives: To illustrate the phenomenology of the coupling problem with references to examples in the literature and to show how the problem can be analysed. Proposals are made on how to advance the understanding and upcoming challenges with emerging modeling strategies. This paper is of interest to model developers who aim to improve the models and have to make choices on and test new implementations, to users who have to understand choices presented to them and finally users of outputs, who have to distinguish physical features from numerical problems in the model data.
△ Less
Submitted 12 June, 2017; v1 submitted 20 May, 2016;
originally announced May 2016.
