-
EquiReact: An equivariant neural network for chemical reactions
Authors:
Puck van Gerwen,
Ksenia R. Briling,
Charlotte Bunne,
Vignesh Ram Somnath,
Ruben Laplaza,
Andreas Krause,
Clemence Corminboeuf
Abstract:
Equivariant neural networks have considerably improved the accuracy and data-efficiency of predictions of molecular properties. Building on this success, we introduce EquiReact, an equivariant neural network to infer properties of chemical reactions, built from three-dimensional structures of reactants and products. We illustrate its competitive performance on the prediction of activation barriers…
▽ More
Equivariant neural networks have considerably improved the accuracy and data-efficiency of predictions of molecular properties. Building on this success, we introduce EquiReact, an equivariant neural network to infer properties of chemical reactions, built from three-dimensional structures of reactants and products. We illustrate its competitive performance on the prediction of activation barriers on the GDB7-22-TS, Cyclo-23-TS and Proparg-21-TS datasets with different regimes according to the inclusion of atom-map** information. We show that, compared to state-of-the-art models for reaction property prediction, EquiReact offers: (i) a flexible model with reduced sensitivity between atom-map** regimes, (ii) better extrapolation capabilities to unseen chemistries, (iii) impressive prediction errors for datasets exhibiting subtle variations in three-dimensional geometries of reactants/products, (iv) reduced sensitivity to geometry quality and (iv) excellent data efficiency.
△ Less
Submitted 13 December, 2023;
originally announced December 2023.
-
Assessing the persistence of chalcogen bonds in solution with neural network potentials
Authors:
Veronika Juraskova,
Frederic Celerse,
Ruben Laplaza,
Clemence Corminboeuf
Abstract:
Non-covalent bonding patterns are commonly harvested as a design principle in the field of catalysis, supramolecular chemistry and functional materials to name a few. Yet, their computational description generally neglects finite temperature and environment effects, which promote competing interactions and alter their static gas-phase properties. Recently, neural network potentials (NNPs) trained…
▽ More
Non-covalent bonding patterns are commonly harvested as a design principle in the field of catalysis, supramolecular chemistry and functional materials to name a few. Yet, their computational description generally neglects finite temperature and environment effects, which promote competing interactions and alter their static gas-phase properties. Recently, neural network potentials (NNPs) trained on Density Functional Theory (DFT) data have become increasingly popular to simulate molecular phenomena in condensed phase with an accuracy comparable to ab initio methods. To date, most applications have centered on solid-state materials or fairly simple molecules made of a limited number of elements. Herein, we focus on the persistence and strength of chalcogen bonds involving a benzotelluradiazole in condensed phase. While the tellurium-containing heteroaromatic molecules are known to exhibit pronounced interactions with anions and lone pairs of different atoms, the relevance of competing intermolecular interactions, notably with the solvent, is complicated to monitor experimentally but also challenging to model at an accurate electronic structure level. Here, we train direct and baselined NNPs to reproduce hybrid DFT energies and forces in order to identify what are the most prevalent non-covalent interactions occurring in a solute-Cl$^-$-THF mixture. The simulations in explicit solvent highlight the clear competition with chalcogen bonds formed with the solvent and the short-range directionality of the interaction with direct consequences for the molecular properties in the solution. The comparison with other potentials (e.g., AMOEBA, direct NNP and continuum solvent model) also demonstrates that baselined NNPs offer a reliable picture of the non-covalent interaction interplay occurring in solution.
△ Less
Submitted 12 January, 2022;
originally announced January 2022.
-
Overcoming Distrust in Solid State Simulations: Adding Error Bars to Computational Data
Authors:
Francesca Peccati,
Rubén Laplaza,
Julia Contreras-García
Abstract:
Simulation techniques are providing with each passing day a deeper insight into the structure and properties of materials. Two main obstacles appear for the cooperation of simulation and experiment: on the one hand, the frequent lack of a degree of uncertainty associated with calculated data. On the other, the concomitant underlying feeling that calculation parameters can be tuned with the explici…
▽ More
Simulation techniques are providing with each passing day a deeper insight into the structure and properties of materials. Two main obstacles appear for the cooperation of simulation and experiment: on the one hand, the frequent lack of a degree of uncertainty associated with calculated data. On the other, the concomitant underlying feeling that calculation parameters can be tuned with the explicit aim of matching the experimental results, even at the expense of the quality of the simulation. Without the definition of an error bar for estimating the precision of the calculation, direct comparison of calculated and experimental data can lack physical significance. In this contribution, we employ the well known delocalization error of DFT and HF to develop a simple and robust procedure to quickly estimate an error bar for calculated quantities in the field of solid state chemistry. First, we validate our model on one of the simplest properties of a solid, the geometry of its unit cell, which can be determined experimentally with high accuracy. In this case, our computational window is too large to provide a useful error bar. However, it provides computational material scientists with a pointer on how much a given system is affected by the method of choice, i.e. how much it is sensible to parameter tuning and how much care should be taken in doing it. Then, we move to another quantity which has a greater experimental uncertainty, namely transition pressure, and show that our approach can lead to error bars comparable to experiment. Hence, both experiment and theory can be compared on an even basis taking into account the uncertainty introduced by the scientist, both in the measuring conditions and the tuning of computational parameters.
△ Less
Submitted 28 June, 2018;
originally announced June 2018.
