Comparing Redundant and Sky Model Based Interferometric Calibration: A First Look with Phase II of the MWA
Authors:
W. Li,
J. C. Pober,
B. J. Hazelton,
N. Barry,
M. F. Morales,
I. Sullivan,
A. R. Parsons,
Z. S. Ali,
J. S. Dillon,
A. P. Beardsley,
J. D. Bowman,
F. Briggs,
R. Byrne,
P. Carroll,
B. Crosse,
D. Emrich,
A. Ewall-Wice,
L. Feng,
T. M. O. Franzen,
J. N. Hewitt,
L. Horsley,
D. C. Jacobs,
M. Johnston-Hollitt,
C. Jordan,
R. C. Joseph
, et al. (31 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Interferometric arrays seeking to measure the 21 cm signal from the Epoch of Reionization must contend with overwhelmingly bright emission from foreground sources. Accurate recovery of the 21 cm signal will require precise calibration of the array, and several new avenues for calibration have been pursued in recent years, including methods using redundancy in the antenna configuration. The newly u…
▽ More
Interferometric arrays seeking to measure the 21 cm signal from the Epoch of Reionization must contend with overwhelmingly bright emission from foreground sources. Accurate recovery of the 21 cm signal will require precise calibration of the array, and several new avenues for calibration have been pursued in recent years, including methods using redundancy in the antenna configuration. The newly upgraded Phase II of Murchison Widefield Array (MWA) is the first interferometer that has large numbers of redundant baselines while retaining good instantaneous UV-coverage. This array therefore provides a unique opportunity to compare redundant calibration with sky-model based algorithms. In this paper, we present the first results from comparing both calibration approaches with MWA Phase II observations. For redundant calibration, we use the package OMNICAL, and produce sky-based calibration solutions with the analysis package Fast Holographic Deconvolution (FHD). There are three principal results. (1) We report the success of OMNICAL on observations of ORBComm satellites, showing substantial agreement between redundant visibility measurements after calibration. (2) We directly compare OMNICAL calibration solutions with those from FHD, and demonstrate these two different calibration schemes give extremely similar results. (3) We explore improved calibration by combining OMNICAL and FHD. We evaluate these combined methods using power spectrum techniques developed for EoR analysis and find evidence for marginal improvements mitigating artifacts in the power spectrum. These results are likely limited by signal-to-noise in the six hours of data used, but suggest future directions for combining these two calibration schemes.
△ Less
Submitted 13 July, 2018;
originally announced July 2018.
Improved 21 cm Epoch Of Reionization Power Spectrum Measurements with a Hybrid Foreground Subtraction and Avoidance Technique
Authors:
Joshua Kerrigan,
Jonathan Pober,
Zaki Ali,
Carina Cheng,
Aaron Parsons,
James Aguirre,
Nichole Barry,
Richard Bradley,
Gianni Bernardi,
Chris Carilli,
David DeBoer,
Joshua Dillon,
Daniel Jacobs,
Saul Kohn,
Matthew Kolopanis,
Adam Lanman,
Wenyang Li,
Adrian Liu,
Ian Sullivan
Abstract:
Observations of the 21cm Epoch of Reionization (EoR) signal are dominated by Galactic and extragalactic foregrounds. The need for foreground removal has led to the development of two main techniques, often referred to as "foreground avoidance" and "foreground subtraction." Avoidance is associated with filtering foregrounds in Fourier space, while subtraction uses an explicit foreground model that…
▽ More
Observations of the 21cm Epoch of Reionization (EoR) signal are dominated by Galactic and extragalactic foregrounds. The need for foreground removal has led to the development of two main techniques, often referred to as "foreground avoidance" and "foreground subtraction." Avoidance is associated with filtering foregrounds in Fourier space, while subtraction uses an explicit foreground model that is removed. Using 1088 hours of data from the 64-element PAPER array, we demonstrate that subtraction of a foreground model prior to delay-space foreground filtering results in a modest but measurable improvement of the performance of the filter. This proof-of-concept result shows that improvement stems from the reduced dynamic range requirements needed for the foreground filter: subtraction of a foreground model reduces the total foreground power, so for a fixed dynamic range, the filter can push towards fainter limits. We also find that the choice of window function used in the foreground filter can have an appreciable affect on the performance near the edges of the observing band. We demonstrate these effects using a smaller 3 hour sampling of data from the MWA, and find that the hybrid filtering and subtraction removal approach provides similar improvements across the band as seen in the case with PAPER-64.
△ Less
Submitted 21 February, 2019; v1 submitted 1 January, 2018;
originally announced January 2018.
