Showing 1–14 of 14 results for author: Lale**i, A

Phylogeny-Informed Interaction Estimation Accelerates Co-Evolutionary Learning

Authors: Jack Garbus, Thomas Willkens, Alexander Lale**i, Jordan Pollack

Abstract: Co-evolution is a powerful problem-solving approach. However, fitness evaluation in co-evolutionary algorithms can be computationally expensive, as the quality of an individual in one population is defined by its interactions with many (or all) members of one or more other populations. To accelerate co-evolutionary systems, we introduce phylogeny-informed interaction estimation, which uses runtime… ▽ More Co-evolution is a powerful problem-solving approach. However, fitness evaluation in co-evolutionary algorithms can be computationally expensive, as the quality of an individual in one population is defined by its interactions with many (or all) members of one or more other populations. To accelerate co-evolutionary systems, we introduce phylogeny-informed interaction estimation, which uses runtime phylogenetic analysis to estimate interaction outcomes between individuals based on how their relatives performed against each other. We test our interaction estimation method with three distinct co-evolutionary systems: two systems focused on measuring problem-solving success and one focused on measuring evolutionary open-endedness. We find that phylogeny-informed estimation can substantially reduce the computation required to solve problems, particularly at the beginning of long-term evolutionary runs. Additionally, we find that our estimation method initially jump-starts the evolution of neural complexity in our open-ended domain, but estimation-free systems eventually "catch-up" if given enough time. More broadly, continued refinements to these phylogeny-informed interaction estimation methods offers a promising path to reducing the computational cost of running co-evolutionary systems while maintaining their open-endedness. △ Less

Submitted 9 April, 2024; originally announced April 2024.

Runtime phylogenetic analysis enables extreme subsampling for test-based problems

Authors: Alexander Lale**i, Marcos Sanson, Jack Garbus, Matthew Andres Moreno, Emily Dolson

Abstract: A phylogeny describes the evolutionary history of an evolving population. Evolutionary search algorithms can perfectly track the ancestry of candidate solutions, illuminating a population's trajectory through the search space. However, phylogenetic analyses are typically limited to post-hoc studies of search performance. We introduce phylogeny-informed subsampling, a new class of subsampling metho… ▽ More A phylogeny describes the evolutionary history of an evolving population. Evolutionary search algorithms can perfectly track the ancestry of candidate solutions, illuminating a population's trajectory through the search space. However, phylogenetic analyses are typically limited to post-hoc studies of search performance. We introduce phylogeny-informed subsampling, a new class of subsampling methods that exploit runtime phylogenetic analyses for solving test-based problems. Specifically, we assess two phylogeny-informed subsampling methods -- individualized random subsampling and ancestor-based subsampling -- on three diagnostic problems and ten genetic programming (GP) problems from program synthesis benchmark suites. Overall, we found that phylogeny-informed subsampling methods enable problem-solving success at extreme subsampling levels where other subsampling methods fail. For example, phylogeny-informed subsampling methods more reliably solved program synthesis problems when evaluating just one training case per-individual, per-generation. However, at moderate subsampling levels, phylogeny-informed subsampling generally performed no better than random subsampling on GP problems. Our diagnostic experiments show that phylogeny-informed subsampling improves diversity maintenance relative to random subsampling, but its effects on a selection scheme's capacity to rapidly exploit fitness gradients varied by selection scheme. Continued refinements of phylogeny-informed subsampling techniques offer a promising new direction for scaling up evolutionary systems to handle problems with many expensive-to-evaluate fitness criteria. △ Less

Submitted 2 February, 2024; originally announced February 2024.

Comments: Conference submission

Reachability Analysis for Lexicase Selection via Community Assembly Graphs

Authors: Emily Dolson, Alexander Lale**i

Abstract: Fitness landscapes have historically been a powerful tool for analyzing the search space explored by evolutionary algorithms. In particular, they facilitate understanding how easily reachable an optimal solution is from a given starting point. However, simple fitness landscapes are inappropriate for analyzing the search space seen by selection schemes like lexicase selection in which the outcome o… ▽ More Fitness landscapes have historically been a powerful tool for analyzing the search space explored by evolutionary algorithms. In particular, they facilitate understanding how easily reachable an optimal solution is from a given starting point. However, simple fitness landscapes are inappropriate for analyzing the search space seen by selection schemes like lexicase selection in which the outcome of selection depends heavily on the current contents of the population (i.e. selection schemes with complex ecological dynamics). Here, we propose borrowing a tool from ecology to solve this problem: community assembly graphs. We demonstrate a simple proof-of-concept for this approach on an NK Landscape where we have perfect information. We then demonstrate that this approach can be successfully applied to a complex genetic programming problem. While further research is necessary to understand how to best use this tool, we believe it will be a valuable addition to our toolkit and facilitate analyses that were previously impossible. △ Less

Submitted 19 September, 2023; originally announced September 2023.

Phylogeny-informed fitness estimation

Authors: Alexander Lale**i, Matthew Andres Moreno, Jose Guadalupe Hernandez, Emily Dolson

Abstract: Phylogenies (ancestry trees) depict the evolutionary history of an evolving population. In evolutionary computing, a phylogeny can reveal how an evolutionary algorithm steers a population through a search space, illuminating the step-by-step process by which any solutions evolve. Thus far, phylogenetic analyses have primarily been applied as post-hoc analyses used to deepen our understanding of ex… ▽ More Phylogenies (ancestry trees) depict the evolutionary history of an evolving population. In evolutionary computing, a phylogeny can reveal how an evolutionary algorithm steers a population through a search space, illuminating the step-by-step process by which any solutions evolve. Thus far, phylogenetic analyses have primarily been applied as post-hoc analyses used to deepen our understanding of existing evolutionary algorithms. Here, we investigate whether phylogenetic analyses can be used at runtime to augment parent selection procedures during an evolutionary search. Specifically, we propose phylogeny-informed fitness estimation, which exploits a population's phylogeny to estimate fitness evaluations. We evaluate phylogeny-informed fitness estimation in the context of the down-sampled lexicase and cohort lexicase selection algorithms on two diagnostic analyses and four genetic programming (GP) problems. Our results indicate that phylogeny-informed fitness estimation can mitigate the drawbacks of down-sampled lexicase, improving diversity maintenance and search space exploration. However, the extent to which phylogeny-informed fitness estimation improves problem-solving success for GP varies by problem, subsampling method, and subsampling level. This work serves as an initial step toward improving evolutionary algorithms by exploiting runtime phylogenetic analysis. △ Less

Submitted 6 June, 2023; originally announced June 2023.

Comments: Submitted as contribution to GPTP XX

Analyzing the Interaction Between Down-Sampling and Selection

Authors: Ryan Boldi, Ashley Bao, Martin Briesch, Thomas Helmuth, Dominik Sobania, Lee Spector, Alexander Lale**i

Abstract: Genetic programming systems often use large training sets to evaluate the quality of candidate solutions for selection. However, evaluating populations on large training sets can be computationally expensive. Down-sampling training sets has long been used to decrease the computational cost of evaluation in a wide range of application domains. Indeed, recent studies have shown that both random and… ▽ More Genetic programming systems often use large training sets to evaluate the quality of candidate solutions for selection. However, evaluating populations on large training sets can be computationally expensive. Down-sampling training sets has long been used to decrease the computational cost of evaluation in a wide range of application domains. Indeed, recent studies have shown that both random and informed down-sampling can substantially improve problem-solving success for GP systems that use the lexicase parent selection algorithm. We use the PushGP framework to experimentally test whether these down-sampling techniques can also improve problem-solving success in the context of two other commonly used selection methods, fitness-proportionate and tournament selection, across eight GP problems (four program synthesis and four symbolic regression). We verified that down-sampling can benefit the problem-solving success of both fitness-proportionate and tournament selection. However, the number of problems wherein down-sampling improved problem-solving success varied by selection scheme, suggesting that the impact of down-sampling depends both on the problem and choice of selection scheme. Surprisingly, we found that down-sampling was most consistently beneficial when combined with lexicase selection as compared to tournament and fitness-proportionate selection. Overall, our results suggest that down-sampling should be considered more often when solving test-based GP problems. △ Less

Submitted 14 April, 2023; originally announced April 2023.

Comments: 9 pages

A Static Analysis of Informed Down-Samples

Authors: Ryan Boldi, Alexander Lale**i, Thomas Helmuth, Lee Spector

Abstract: We present an analysis of the loss of population-level test coverage induced by different down-sampling strategies when combined with lexicase selection. We study recorded populations from the first generation of genetic programming runs, as well as entirely synthetic populations. Our findings verify the hypothesis that informed down-sampling better maintains population-level test coverage when co… ▽ More We present an analysis of the loss of population-level test coverage induced by different down-sampling strategies when combined with lexicase selection. We study recorded populations from the first generation of genetic programming runs, as well as entirely synthetic populations. Our findings verify the hypothesis that informed down-sampling better maintains population-level test coverage when compared to random down-sampling. Additionally, we show that both forms of down-sampling cause greater test coverage loss than standard lexicase selection with no down-sampling. However, given more information about the population, we found that informed down-sampling can further reduce its test coverage loss. We also recommend wider adoption of the static population analyses we present in this work. △ Less

Submitted 16 April, 2023; v1 submitted 4 April, 2023; originally announced April 2023.

Comments: Accepted to the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference 2023

Informed Down-Sampled Lexicase Selection: Identifying productive training cases for efficient problem solving

Authors: Ryan Boldi, Martin Briesch, Dominik Sobania, Alexander Lale**i, Thomas Helmuth, Franz Rothlauf, Charles Ofria, Lee Spector

Abstract: Genetic Programming (GP) often uses large training sets and requires all individuals to be evaluated on all training cases during selection. Random down-sampled lexicase selection evaluates individuals on only a random subset of the training cases allowing for more individuals to be explored with the same amount of program executions. However, creating a down-sample randomly might exclude importan… ▽ More Genetic Programming (GP) often uses large training sets and requires all individuals to be evaluated on all training cases during selection. Random down-sampled lexicase selection evaluates individuals on only a random subset of the training cases allowing for more individuals to be explored with the same amount of program executions. However, creating a down-sample randomly might exclude important cases from the current down-sample for a number of generations, while cases that measure the same behavior (synonymous cases) may be overused despite their redundancy. In this work, we introduce Informed Down-Sampled Lexicase Selection. This method leverages population statistics to build down-samples that contain more distinct and therefore informative training cases. Through an empirical investigation across two different GP systems (PushGP and Grammar-Guided GP), we find that informed down-sampling significantly outperforms random down-sampling on a set of contemporary program synthesis benchmark problems. Through an analysis of the created down-samples, we find that important training cases are included in the down-sample consistently across independent evolutionary runs and systems. We hypothesize that this improvement can be attributed to the ability of Informed Down-Sampled Lexicase Selection to maintain more specialist individuals over the course of evolution, while also benefiting from reduced per-evaluation costs. △ Less

Submitted 22 February, 2024; v1 submitted 4 January, 2023; originally announced January 2023.

Comments: Accepted for Publication in the Evolutionary Computation Journal by MIT Press

A suite of diagnostic metrics for characterizing selection schemes

Authors: Jose Guadalupe Hernandez, Alexander Lale**i, Charles Ofria

Abstract: Benchmark suites are crucial for assessing the performance of evolutionary algorithms, but the constituent problems are often too complex to provide clear intuition about an algorithm's strengths and weaknesses. To address this gap, we introduce DOSSIER ("Diagnostic Overview of Selection Schemes In Evolutionary Runs"), a diagnostic suite initially composed of eight handcrafted metrics. These metri… ▽ More Benchmark suites are crucial for assessing the performance of evolutionary algorithms, but the constituent problems are often too complex to provide clear intuition about an algorithm's strengths and weaknesses. To address this gap, we introduce DOSSIER ("Diagnostic Overview of Selection Schemes In Evolutionary Runs"), a diagnostic suite initially composed of eight handcrafted metrics. These metrics are designed to empirically measure specific capacities for exploitation, exploration, and their interactions. We consider exploitation both with and without constraints, and we divide exploration into two aspects: diversity exploration (the ability to simultaneously explore multiple pathways) and valley-crossing exploration (the ability to cross wider and wider fitness valleys). We apply DOSSIER to six popular selection schemes: truncation, tournament, fitness sharing, lexicase, nondominated sorting, and novelty search. Our results confirm that simple schemes (e.g., tournament and truncation) emphasized exploitation. For more sophisticated schemes, however, our diagnostics revealed interesting dynamics. Lexicase selection performed moderately well across all diagnostics that did not incorporate valley crossing, but faltered dramatically whenever valleys were present, performing worse than even random search. Fitness sharing was the only scheme to effectively contend with valley crossing but it struggled with the other diagnostics. Our study highlights the utility of using diagnostics to gain nuanced insights into selection scheme characteristics, which can inform the design of new selection methods. △ Less

Submitted 23 October, 2023; v1 submitted 28 April, 2022; originally announced April 2022.

Comments: Incorporated valley crossing diagnostics and results. Also refactored paper to focus on three key problem characteristics

What can phylogenetic metrics tell us about useful diversity in evolutionary algorithms?

Authors: Jose Guadalupe Hernandez, Alexander Lale**i, Emily Dolson

Abstract: It is generally accepted that "diversity" is associated with success in evolutionary algorithms. However, diversity is a broad concept that can be measured and defined in a multitude of ways. To date, most evolutionary computation research has measured diversity using the richness and/or evenness of a particular genotypic or phenotypic property. While these metrics are informative, we hypothesize… ▽ More It is generally accepted that "diversity" is associated with success in evolutionary algorithms. However, diversity is a broad concept that can be measured and defined in a multitude of ways. To date, most evolutionary computation research has measured diversity using the richness and/or evenness of a particular genotypic or phenotypic property. While these metrics are informative, we hypothesize that other diversity metrics are more strongly predictive of success. Phylogenetic diversity metrics are a class of metrics popularly used in biology, which take into account the evolutionary history of a population. Here, we investigate the extent to which 1) these metrics provide different information than those traditionally used in evolutionary computation, and 2) these metrics better predict the long-term success of a run of evolutionary computation. We find that, in most cases, phylogenetic metrics behave meaningfully differently from other diversity metrics. Moreover, our results suggest that phylogenetic diversity is indeed a better predictor of success. △ Less

Submitted 28 August, 2021; originally announced August 2021.

Comments: 21 page, 7 figures. Presented Genetic Programming in Theory and Practice, 2021

ACM Class: I.2.2

Matchmaker, Matchmaker, Make Me a Match: Geometric, Variational, and Evolutionary Implications of Criteria for Tag Affinity

Authors: Matthew Andres Moreno, Alexander Lale**i, Charles Ofria

Abstract: Genetic programming and artificial life systems commonly employ tag-matching schemes to determine interactions between model components. However, the implications of criteria used to determine affinity between tags with respect to constraints on emergent connectivity, canalization of changes to connectivity under mutation, and evolutionary dynamics have not been considered. We highlight difference… ▽ More Genetic programming and artificial life systems commonly employ tag-matching schemes to determine interactions between model components. However, the implications of criteria used to determine affinity between tags with respect to constraints on emergent connectivity, canalization of changes to connectivity under mutation, and evolutionary dynamics have not been considered. We highlight differences between tag-matching criteria with respect to geometric constraint and variation generated under mutation. We find that tag-matching criteria can influence the rate of adaptive evolution and the quality of evolved solutions. Better understanding of the geometric, variational, and evolutionary properties of tag-matching criteria will facilitate more effective incorporation of tag matching into genetic programming and artificial life systems. By showing that tag-matching criteria influence connectivity patterns and evolutionary dynamics, our findings also raise fundamental questions about the properties of tag-matching systems in nature. △ Less

Submitted 10 August, 2021; originally announced August 2021.

SignalGP-Lite: Event Driven Genetic Programming Library for Large-Scale Artificial Life Applications

Authors: Matthew Andres Moreno, Santiago Rodriguez Papa, Alexander Lale**i, Charles Ofria

Abstract: Event-driven genetic programming representations have been shown to outperform traditional imperative representations on interaction-intensive problems. The event-driven approach organizes genome content into modules that are triggered in response to environmental signals, simplifying simulation design and implementation. Existing work develo** event-driven genetic programming methodology has la… ▽ More Event-driven genetic programming representations have been shown to outperform traditional imperative representations on interaction-intensive problems. The event-driven approach organizes genome content into modules that are triggered in response to environmental signals, simplifying simulation design and implementation. Existing work develo** event-driven genetic programming methodology has largely used the SignalGP library, which caters to traditional program synthesis applications. The SignalGP-Lite library enables larger-scale artificial life experiments with streamlined agents by reducing control flow overhead and trading run-time flexibility for better performance due to compile-time configuration. Here, we report benchmarking experiments that show an 8x to 30x speedup. We also report solution quality equivalent to SignalGP on two benchmark problems originally developed to test the ability of evolved programs to respond to a large number of signals and to modulate signal response based on context. △ Less

Submitted 1 August, 2021; originally announced August 2021.

An Exploration of Exploration: Measuring the ability of lexicase selection to find obscure pathways to optimality

Authors: Jose Guadalupe Hernandez, Alexander Lale**i, Charles Ofria

Abstract: Parent selection algorithms (selection schemes) steer populations through a problem's search space, often trading off between exploitation and exploration. Understanding how selection schemes affect exploitation and exploration within a search space is crucial to tackling increasingly challenging problems. Here, we introduce an "exploration diagnostic" that diagnoses a selection scheme's capacity… ▽ More Parent selection algorithms (selection schemes) steer populations through a problem's search space, often trading off between exploitation and exploration. Understanding how selection schemes affect exploitation and exploration within a search space is crucial to tackling increasingly challenging problems. Here, we introduce an "exploration diagnostic" that diagnoses a selection scheme's capacity for search space exploration. We use our exploration diagnostic to investigate the exploratory capacity of lexicase selection and several of its variants: epsilon lexicase, down-sampled lexicase, cohort lexicase, and novelty-lexicase. We verify that lexicase selection out-explores tournament selection, and we show that lexicase selection's exploratory capacity can be sensitive to the ratio between population size and the number of test cases used for evaluating candidate solutions. Additionally, we find that relaxing lexicase's elitism with epsilon lexicase can further improve exploration. Both down-sampling and cohort lexicase -- two techniques for applying random subsampling to test cases -- degrade lexicase's exploratory capacity; however, we find that cohort partitioning better preserves lexicase's exploratory capacity than down-sampling. Finally, we find evidence that novelty-lexicase's addition of novelty test cases can degrade lexicase's capacity for exploration. Overall, our findings provide hypotheses for further exploration and actionable insights and recommendations for using lexicase selection. Additionally, this work demonstrates the value of selection scheme diagnostics as a complement to more conventional benchmarking approaches to selection scheme analysis. △ Less

Submitted 26 July, 2021; v1 submitted 20 July, 2021; originally announced July 2021.

Comments: Changes to the axis labels and added funding sources to acknowledgments

Tag-based regulation of modules in genetic programming improves context-dependent problem solving

Authors: Alexander Lale**i, Matthew Andres Moreno, Charles Ofria

Abstract: We introduce and experimentally demonstrate the utility of tag-based genetic regulation, a new genetic programming (GP) technique that allows programs to dynamically adjust which code modules to express. Tags are evolvable labels that provide a flexible mechanism for referencing code modules. Tag-based genetic regulation extends existing tag-based naming schemes to allow programs to "promote" and… ▽ More We introduce and experimentally demonstrate the utility of tag-based genetic regulation, a new genetic programming (GP) technique that allows programs to dynamically adjust which code modules to express. Tags are evolvable labels that provide a flexible mechanism for referencing code modules. Tag-based genetic regulation extends existing tag-based naming schemes to allow programs to "promote" and "repress" code modules in order to alter expression patterns. This extension allows evolution to structure a program as a gene regulatory network where modules are regulated based on instruction executions. We demonstrate the functionality of tag-based regulation on a range of program synthesis problems. We find that tag-based regulation improves problem-solving performance on context-dependent problems; that is, problems where programs must adjust how they respond to current inputs based on prior inputs. Indeed, the system could not evolve solutions to some context-dependent problems until regulation was added. Our implementation of tag-based genetic regulation is not universally beneficial, however. We identify scenarios where the correct response to a particular input never changes, rendering tag-based regulation an unneeded functionality that can sometimes impede adaptive evolution. Tag-based genetic regulation broadens our repertoire of techniques for evolving more dynamic genetic programs and can easily be incorporated into existing tag-enabled GP systems. △ Less

Submitted 9 July, 2021; v1 submitted 16 December, 2020; originally announced December 2020.

Comments: 2020-12-23-revisions: correct typos; revise abstract, results & discussion, and conclusion based on feedback; add unsuccessful runs to performance figures 2021-07-03-revisions: update title; incorporate feedback; add journal reference. Genet Program Evolvable Mach (2021)

Evolving Event-driven Programs with SignalGP

Authors: Alexander Lale**i, Charles Ofria

Abstract: We present SignalGP, a new genetic programming (GP) technique designed to incorporate the event-driven programming paradigm into computational evolution's toolbox. Event-driven programming is a software design philosophy that simplifies the development of reactive programs by automatically triggering program modules (event-handlers) in response to external events, such as signals from the environm… ▽ More We present SignalGP, a new genetic programming (GP) technique designed to incorporate the event-driven programming paradigm into computational evolution's toolbox. Event-driven programming is a software design philosophy that simplifies the development of reactive programs by automatically triggering program modules (event-handlers) in response to external events, such as signals from the environment or messages from other programs. SignalGP incorporates these concepts by extending existing tag-based referencing techniques into an event-driven context. Both events and functions are labeled with evolvable tags; when an event occurs, the function with the closest matching tag is triggered. In this work, we apply SignalGP in the context of linear GP. We demonstrate the value of the event-driven paradigm using two distinct test problems (an environment coordination problem and a distributed leader election problem) by comparing SignalGP to variants that are otherwise identical, but must actively use sensors to process events or messages. In each of these problems, rapid interaction with the environment or other agents is critical for maximizing fitness. We also discuss ways in which SignalGP can be generalized beyond our linear GP implementation. △ Less

Submitted 15 April, 2018; originally announced April 2018.