The James Webb Space Telescope Mission
Authors:
Jonathan P. Gardner,
John C. Mather,
Randy Abbott,
James S. Abell,
Mark Abernathy,
Faith E. Abney,
John G. Abraham,
Roberto Abraham,
Yasin M. Abul-Huda,
Scott Acton,
Cynthia K. Adams,
Evan Adams,
David S. Adler,
Maarten Adriaensen,
Jonathan Albert Aguilar,
Mansoor Ahmed,
Nasif S. Ahmed,
Tanjira Ahmed,
Rüdeger Albat,
Loïc Albert,
Stacey Alberts,
David Aldridge,
Mary Marsha Allen,
Shaune S. Allen,
Martin Altenburg
, et al. (983 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Twenty-six years ago a small committee report, building on earlier studies, expounded a compelling and poetic vision for the future of astronomy, calling for an infrared-optimized space telescope with an aperture of at least $4m$. With the support of their governments in the US, Europe, and Canada, 20,000 people realized that vision as the $6.5m$ James Webb Space Telescope. A generation of astrono…
▽ More
Twenty-six years ago a small committee report, building on earlier studies, expounded a compelling and poetic vision for the future of astronomy, calling for an infrared-optimized space telescope with an aperture of at least $4m$. With the support of their governments in the US, Europe, and Canada, 20,000 people realized that vision as the $6.5m$ James Webb Space Telescope. A generation of astronomers will celebrate their accomplishments for the life of the mission, potentially as long as 20 years, and beyond. This report and the scientific discoveries that follow are extended thank-you notes to the 20,000 team members. The telescope is working perfectly, with much better image quality than expected. In this and accompanying papers, we give a brief history, describe the observatory, outline its objectives and current observing program, and discuss the inventions and people who made it possible. We cite detailed reports on the design and the measured performance on orbit.
△ Less
Submitted 10 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
Gaia: focus, straylight and basic angle
Authors:
A. Mora,
M. Biermann,
A. Bombrun,
J. Boyadian,
F. Chassat,
P. Corberand,
M. Davidson,
D. Doyle,
D. Escolar,
W. L. M. Gielesen,
T. Guilpain,
J. Hernandez,
V. Kirschner,
S. A. Klioner,
C. Koeck,
B. Laine,
L. Lindegren,
E. Serpell,
P. Tatry,
P Thoral
Abstract:
The Gaia all-sky astrometric survey is challenged by several issues affecting the spacecraft stability. Amongst them, we find the focus evolution, straylight and basic angle variations
Contrary to pre-launch expectations, the image quality is continuously evolving, during commissioning and the nominal mission. Payload decontaminations and wavefront sensor assisted refocuses have been carried out…
▽ More
The Gaia all-sky astrometric survey is challenged by several issues affecting the spacecraft stability. Amongst them, we find the focus evolution, straylight and basic angle variations
Contrary to pre-launch expectations, the image quality is continuously evolving, during commissioning and the nominal mission. Payload decontaminations and wavefront sensor assisted refocuses have been carried out to recover optimum performance. Straylight and basic angle variations several orders of magnitude greater than foreseen were found and studied during commissioning by the Gaia scientists (payload experts). Building on their investigations, an ESA-Airbus DS working group was established during the early nominal mission and worked on a detailed root cause analysis. In parallel, Gaia scientists have also continued analysing the data, most notably comparing the BAM signal to global astrometric solutions, with remarkable agreement.
In this contribution, a status review of these issues will be provided, with emphasis on the mitigation schemes and the lessons learned for future space missions where extreme stability is a key requirement.
△ Less
Submitted 21 August, 2016; v1 submitted 29 July, 2016;
originally announced August 2016.
