-
The James Webb Space Telescope Mission
Authors:
Jonathan P. Gardner,
John C. Mather,
Randy Abbott,
James S. Abell,
Mark Abernathy,
Faith E. Abney,
John G. Abraham,
Roberto Abraham,
Yasin M. Abul-Huda,
Scott Acton,
Cynthia K. Adams,
Evan Adams,
David S. Adler,
Maarten Adriaensen,
Jonathan Albert Aguilar,
Mansoor Ahmed,
Nasif S. Ahmed,
Tanjira Ahmed,
Rüdeger Albat,
Loïc Albert,
Stacey Alberts,
David Aldridge,
Mary Marsha Allen,
Shaune S. Allen,
Martin Altenburg
, et al. (983 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Twenty-six years ago a small committee report, building on earlier studies, expounded a compelling and poetic vision for the future of astronomy, calling for an infrared-optimized space telescope with an aperture of at least $4m$. With the support of their governments in the US, Europe, and Canada, 20,000 people realized that vision as the $6.5m$ James Webb Space Telescope. A generation of astrono…
▽ More
Twenty-six years ago a small committee report, building on earlier studies, expounded a compelling and poetic vision for the future of astronomy, calling for an infrared-optimized space telescope with an aperture of at least $4m$. With the support of their governments in the US, Europe, and Canada, 20,000 people realized that vision as the $6.5m$ James Webb Space Telescope. A generation of astronomers will celebrate their accomplishments for the life of the mission, potentially as long as 20 years, and beyond. This report and the scientific discoveries that follow are extended thank-you notes to the 20,000 team members. The telescope is working perfectly, with much better image quality than expected. In this and accompanying papers, we give a brief history, describe the observatory, outline its objectives and current observing program, and discuss the inventions and people who made it possible. We cite detailed reports on the design and the measured performance on orbit.
△ Less
Submitted 10 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
-
How dark the sky: the JWST backgrounds
Authors:
Jane R. Rigby,
Paul A. Lightsey,
Macarena García Marín,
Charles W. Bowers,
Erin C. Smith,
Alistair Glasse,
Michael W. McElwain,
George H. Rieke,
Ranga-Ram Chary,
Xiang Liu,
Mark Clampin,
Wayne Kinzel,
Vicki Laidler,
Kimberly I. Mehalick,
Alberto Noriega-Crespo,
Irene Shivaei,
Christopher Stark,
Tea Temim,
Zongying Wei,
Chris J. Willott
Abstract:
We describe the sources of stray light and thermal background that affect JWST observations, report actual backgrounds as measured from commissioning and early-science observations, compare these background levels to prelaunch predictions, estimate the impact of the backgrounds on science performance, and explore how the backgrounds probe the achieved configuration of the deployed observatory. We…
▽ More
We describe the sources of stray light and thermal background that affect JWST observations, report actual backgrounds as measured from commissioning and early-science observations, compare these background levels to prelaunch predictions, estimate the impact of the backgrounds on science performance, and explore how the backgrounds probe the achieved configuration of the deployed observatory. We find that for almost all applications, the observatory is limited by the irreducible astrophysical backgrounds, rather than scattered stray light and thermal self-emission, for all wavelengths lambda < 12.5 micron, thus meeting the level 1 requirement. This result was not assured given the open architecture and thermal challenges of JWST, and it is the result of meticulous attention to stray light and thermal issues in the design, construction, integration, and test phases. From background considerations alone, JWST will require less integration time in the near-infrared compared to a system that just met the stray-light requirements; as such, JWST will be even more powerful than expected for deep imaging at 1-5 micron. In the mid-infrared, the measured thermal backgrounds closely match prelaunch predictions. The background near 10 micron is slightly higher than predicted before launch, but the impact on observations is mitigated by the excellent throughput of MIRI, such that instrument sensitivity will be as good as expected prelaunch. These measured background levels are fully compatible with JWST's science goals and the Cycle 1 science program currently underway.
△ Less
Submitted 18 May, 2023; v1 submitted 17 November, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
-
Pandeia: A Multi-mission Exposure Time Calculator for JWST and WFIRST
Authors:
Klaus M. Pontoppidan,
Timothy E. Pickering,
Victoria G. Laidler,
Karoline Gilbert,
Christopher D. Sontag,
Christine Slocum,
Mark J. Sienkiewicz,
Christopher Hanley,
Nicholas M. Earl,
Laurent Pueyo,
Swara Ravindranath,
Diane M. Karakla,
Massimo Robberto,
Alberto Noriega-Crespo,
Elizabeth A. Barker
Abstract:
Pandeia is the exposure time calculator (ETC) system developed for the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) that will be used for creating JWST proposals. It includes a simulation-hybrid Python engine that calculates the two-dimensional pixel-by-pixel signal and noise properties of the JWST instruments. This allows for appropriate handling of realistic point spread functions, MULTIACCUM detector read…
▽ More
Pandeia is the exposure time calculator (ETC) system developed for the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) that will be used for creating JWST proposals. It includes a simulation-hybrid Python engine that calculates the two-dimensional pixel-by-pixel signal and noise properties of the JWST instruments. This allows for appropriate handling of realistic point spread functions, MULTIACCUM detector readouts, correlated detector readnoise, and multiple photometric and spectral extraction strategies. Pandeia includes support for all the JWST observing modes, including imaging, slitted/slitless spectroscopy, integral field spectroscopy, and coronagraphy. Its highly modular, data-driven design makes it easily adaptable to other observatories. An implementation for use with WFIRST is also available.
△ Less
Submitted 21 March, 2018; v1 submitted 7 July, 2017;
originally announced July 2017.
-
The Second-Generation Guide Star Catalog: Description and Properties
Authors:
B. M. Lasker,
M. G. Lattanzi,
B. J. McLean,
B. Bucciarelli,
R. Drimmel,
J. Garcia,
G. Greene,
F. Guglielmetti,
C. Hanley,
G. Hawkins,
V. G. Laidler,
C. Loomis,
M. Meakes,
R. Mignani,
R. Morbidelli,
J. Morrison,
R. Pannunzio,
A. Rosenberg,
M. Sarasso,
R. L. Smart,
A. Spagna,
C. R. Sturch,
A. Volpicelli,
R. L. White,
D. Wolfe
, et al. (1 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The GSC-II is an all-sky database of objects derived from the uncompressed DSS that the STScI has created from the Palomar and UK Schmidt survey plates and made available to the community. Like its predecessor (GSC-I), the GSC-II was primarily created to provide guide star information and observation planning support for HST. This version, however, is already employed at some of the ground-based…
▽ More
The GSC-II is an all-sky database of objects derived from the uncompressed DSS that the STScI has created from the Palomar and UK Schmidt survey plates and made available to the community. Like its predecessor (GSC-I), the GSC-II was primarily created to provide guide star information and observation planning support for HST. This version, however, is already employed at some of the ground-based new-technology telescopes such as GEMINI, VLT, and TNG, and will also be used to provide support for the JWST and Gaia space missions as well as LAMOST, one of the major ongoing scientific projects in China. Two catalogs have already been extracted from the GSC-II database and released to the astronomical community. A magnitude-limited (R=18.0) version, GSC2.2, was distributed soon after its production in 2001, while the GSC2.3 release has been available for general access since 2007.
The GSC2.3 catalog described in this paper contains astrometry, photometry, and classification for 945,592,683 objects down to the magnitude limit of the plates. Positions are tied to the ICRS; for stellar sources, the all-sky average absolute error per coordinate ranges from 0.2" to 0.28" depending on magnitude. When dealing with extended objects, astrometric errors are 20% worse in the case of galaxies and approximately a factor of 2 worse for blended images. Stellar photometry is determined to 0.13-0.22 mag as a function of magnitude and photographic passbands (B,R,I). Outside of the galactic plane, stellar classification is reliable to at least 90% confidence for magnitudes brighter than R=19.5, and the catalog is complete to R=20.
△ Less
Submitted 16 July, 2008;
originally announced July 2008.
-
AGN Host Galaxies at z~0.4-1.3 : Bulge-dominated and Lacking Merger-AGN Connection
Authors:
N. A. Grogin,
C. J. Conselice,
E. Chatzichristou,
D. M. Alexander,
F. E. Bauer,
A. E. Hornschemeier,
S. Jogee,
A. M. Koekemoer,
V. G. Laidler,
M. Livio,
R. A. Lucas,
M. Paolillo,
S. Ravindranath,
E. J. Schreier,
B. D. Simmons,
C. M. Urry
Abstract:
We investigate morphological structure parameters and local environments of distant moderate-luminosity active galactic nucleus (AGN) host galaxies in the overlap between the HST/ACS observations of the Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey (GOODS) and the two Chandra Deep Fields. We compute near-neighbor counts and BViz asymmetry (A) and concentration (C) indices for ~35,500 GOODS/ACS galaxie…
▽ More
We investigate morphological structure parameters and local environments of distant moderate-luminosity active galactic nucleus (AGN) host galaxies in the overlap between the HST/ACS observations of the Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey (GOODS) and the two Chandra Deep Fields. We compute near-neighbor counts and BViz asymmetry (A) and concentration (C) indices for ~35,500 GOODS/ACS galaxies complete to z_850 ~ 26.6, including the resolved hosts of 322 X-ray-selected AGNs. Distributions of (1) z_850 asymmetry for 130 AGN hosts at z_850 < 23 and (2) near-neighbor counts for 173 AGN hosts at z_850 < 24 are both consistent with non-AGN control samples. This implies no close connection between recent galaxy mergers and moderate-luminosity AGN activity out to appreciable look-back times (z < 1.3), approaching the epoch of peak AGN activity in the universe. The distribution of z_850 concentrations for the AGN hosts is offset by +0.5 compared to the non-AGN, a 6.4-sigma discrepancy much larger than can be explained by the possible influence of unresolved emission from the AGN or a circumnuclear starburst. The local universe association between AGN and bulge-dominated galaxies thus persists to substantial look-back time. We discuss implications in the context of the low-redshift supermassive central black hole mass correlation with host galaxy properties, including concentration.
△ Less
Submitted 5 July, 2005;
originally announced July 2005.
-
The Hubble Higher-Z Supernova Search: Supernovae to z=1.6 and Constraints on Type Ia Progenitor Models
Authors:
L. -G. Strolger,
A. G. Riess,
T. Dahlen,
M. Livio,
N. Panagia,
P. Challis,
J. L. Tonry,
A. V. Filippenko,
R. Chornock,
H. Ferguson,
A. Koekemoer,
B. Mobasher,
M. Dickinson,
M. Giavalisco,
S. Casertano,
R. Hook,
S. Blondin,
B. Leibundgut,
M. Nonino,
P. Rosati,
H. Spinrad,
C. C. Steidel,
D. Stern,
P. M. Garnavich,
T. Matheson
, et al. (11 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present results from the Hubble Higher-z Supernova Search, the first space-based open field survey for supernovae (SNe). In cooperation with the Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey, we have used the Hubble Space Telescope with the Advanced Camera for Surveys to cover 300 square arcmin in the area of the Chandra Deep Field South and the Hubble Deep Field North on five separate search epoch…
▽ More
We present results from the Hubble Higher-z Supernova Search, the first space-based open field survey for supernovae (SNe). In cooperation with the Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey, we have used the Hubble Space Telescope with the Advanced Camera for Surveys to cover 300 square arcmin in the area of the Chandra Deep Field South and the Hubble Deep Field North on five separate search epochs (separated by 45 day intervals) to a limiting magnitude of z'=26. These deep observations have allowed us to discover 42 SNe in the redshift range 0.2 < z < 1.6. As these data span a large range in redshift, they are ideal for testing the validity of Type Ia supernova progenitor models with the distribution of expected ``delay times,'' from progenitor star formation to SN Ia explosion, and the SN rates these models predict. Through a Bayesian maximum likelihood test, we determine which delay-time models best reproduce the redshift distribution of SNe Ia discovered in this survey. We find that models that require a large fraction of ``prompt'' (less than 2 Gyr) SNe Ia poorly reproduce the observed redshift distribution and are rejected at 95% confidence. We find that Gaussian models best fit the observed data for mean delay times in the range of 3 to 4 Gyr.
△ Less
Submitted 24 June, 2004;
originally announced June 2004.
