-
No More Trade-Offs. GPT and Fully Informative Privacy Policies
Authors:
Przemysław Pałka,
Marco Lippi,
Francesca Lagioia,
Rūta Liepiņa,
Giovanni Sartor
Abstract:
The paper reports the results of an experiment aimed at testing to what extent ChatGPT 3.5 and 4 is able to answer questions regarding privacy policies designed in the new format that we propose. In a world of human-only interpreters, there was a trade-off between comprehensiveness and comprehensibility of privacy policies, leading to the actual policies not containing enough information for users…
▽ More
The paper reports the results of an experiment aimed at testing to what extent ChatGPT 3.5 and 4 is able to answer questions regarding privacy policies designed in the new format that we propose. In a world of human-only interpreters, there was a trade-off between comprehensiveness and comprehensibility of privacy policies, leading to the actual policies not containing enough information for users to learn anything meaningful. Having shown that GPT performs relatively well with the new format, we provide experimental evidence supporting our policy suggestion, namely that the law should require fully comprehensive privacy policies, even if this means they become less concise.
△ Less
Submitted 27 December, 2023;
originally announced February 2024.
-
Memory networks for consumer protection:unfairness exposed
Authors:
Federico Ruggeri,
Francesca Lagioia,
Marco Lippi,
Paolo Torroni
Abstract:
Recent work has demonstrated how data-driven AI methods can leverage consumer protection by supporting the automated analysis of legal documents. However, a shortcoming of data-driven approaches is poor explainability. We posit that in this domain useful explanations of classifier outcomes can be provided by resorting to legal rationales. We thus consider several configurations of memory-augmented…
▽ More
Recent work has demonstrated how data-driven AI methods can leverage consumer protection by supporting the automated analysis of legal documents. However, a shortcoming of data-driven approaches is poor explainability. We posit that in this domain useful explanations of classifier outcomes can be provided by resorting to legal rationales. We thus consider several configurations of memory-augmented neural networks where rationales are given a special role in the modeling of context knowledge. Our results show that rationales not only contribute to improve the classification accuracy, but are also able to offer meaningful, natural language explanations of otherwise opaque classifier outcomes.
△ Less
Submitted 24 July, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
-
CLAUDETTE: an Automated Detector of Potentially Unfair Clauses in Online Terms of Service
Authors:
Marco Lippi,
Przemyslaw Palka,
Giuseppe Contissa,
Francesca Lagioia,
Hans-Wolfgang Micklitz,
Giovanni Sartor,
Paolo Torroni
Abstract:
Terms of service of on-line platforms too often contain clauses that are potentially unfair to the consumer. We present an experimental study where machine learning is employed to automatically detect such potentially unfair clauses. Results show that the proposed system could provide a valuable tool for lawyers and consumers alike.
Terms of service of on-line platforms too often contain clauses that are potentially unfair to the consumer. We present an experimental study where machine learning is employed to automatically detect such potentially unfair clauses. Results show that the proposed system could provide a valuable tool for lawyers and consumers alike.
△ Less
Submitted 18 February, 2019; v1 submitted 3 May, 2018;
originally announced May 2018.
