A Computed Tomography Vertebral Segmentation Dataset with Anatomical Variations and Multi-Vendor Scanner Data
Authors:
Hans Liebl,
David Schinz,
Anjany Sekuboyina,
Luca Malagutti,
Maximilian T. Löffler,
Amirhossein Bayat,
Malek El Husseini,
Giles Tetteh,
Katharina Grau,
Eva Niederreiter,
Thomas Baum,
Benedikt Wiestler,
Bjoern Menze,
Rickmer Braren,
Claus Zimmer,
Jan S. Kirschke
Abstract:
With the advent of deep learning algorithms, fully automated radiological image analysis is within reach. In spine imaging, several atlas- and shape-based as well as deep learning segmentation algorithms have been proposed, allowing for subsequent automated analysis of morphology and pathology. The first Large Scale Vertebrae Segmentation Challenge (VerSe 2019) showed that these perform well on no…
▽ More
With the advent of deep learning algorithms, fully automated radiological image analysis is within reach. In spine imaging, several atlas- and shape-based as well as deep learning segmentation algorithms have been proposed, allowing for subsequent automated analysis of morphology and pathology. The first Large Scale Vertebrae Segmentation Challenge (VerSe 2019) showed that these perform well on normal anatomy, but fail in variants not frequently present in the training dataset. Building on that experience, we report on the largely increased VerSe 2020 dataset and results from the second iteration of the VerSe challenge (MICCAI 2020, Lima, Peru). VerSe 2020 comprises annotated spine computed tomography (CT) images from 300 subjects with 4142 fully visualized and annotated vertebrae, collected across multiple centres from four different scanner manufacturers, enriched with cases that exhibit anatomical variants such as enumeration abnormalities (n=77) and transitional vertebrae (n=161). Metadata includes vertebral labelling information, voxel-level segmentation masks obtained with a human-machine hybrid algorithm and anatomical ratings, to enable the development and benchmarking of robust and accurate segmentation algorithms.
△ Less
Submitted 10 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
Association of bone mineral density with reoperation rate following instrumented lumbar spinal fusion
Authors:
Maximilian T. Löffler,
Niklas Loreck,
Johannes Kaesmacher,
Felix Zibold,
Ehab Shiban,
Anna Rienmüller,
Martin Vazan,
Bernhard Meyer,
Yu-Mi Ryang,
Jan S. Kirschke
Abstract:
Low bone mineral density (BMD) is believed to influence the outcome of instrumented spinal surgery and can lead to reoperation. Purpose of this observational and case-control study was to investigate the association of BMD with the risk of reoperation following instrumented lumbar spinal fusion (LSF). For the observational study, 81 patients were included who received LSF with and without augmenta…
▽ More
Low bone mineral density (BMD) is believed to influence the outcome of instrumented spinal surgery and can lead to reoperation. Purpose of this observational and case-control study was to investigate the association of BMD with the risk of reoperation following instrumented lumbar spinal fusion (LSF). For the observational study, 81 patients were included who received LSF with and without augmentation. For the case-control study, 18 patients who had reoperation following LSF were matched to 26 patients who did not have reoperation (matched by sex, age +/- 5 years, fused levels and PMMA-augmentation). Opportunistic BMD screening was performed in perioperative CT scans using asynchronous calibration. Mean BMD was compared between patients with and without reoperation in augmented and non-augmented surgeries. In the observational study, prevalence of osteoporosis (BMD < 80 mg/cc) was 29% in non-augmented and 85% in augmented LSF. Seven of 48 patients with non-augmented (15%) and 4 of 33 patients with augmented LSF (12%) had reoperation. In non-augmented LSF, patients with reoperation had significantly lower BMD than patients without reoperation (P = 0.005). The best cut-off to predict reoperation after non-augmented LSF was BMD < 83.7 mg/cc. In the case-control study, patients with reoperation presented numerically lower BMD of 78.8 +/- 33.1 mg/cc than patients without reoperation with BMD of 89.4 +/- 39.7 mg/cc (P = 0.357). Despite much lower BMD surgeries with PMMA-augmentation showed no higher reoperation rate compared to non-augmented surgeries. Patients with reoperation following LSF showed slightly lower BMD compared to matched patients without reoperation, but the difference was not statistically significant. Opportunistic BMD screening can be performed in preoperative CT, thus informing about osteoporotic bone, a potential risk factor of surgery failure.
△ Less
Submitted 7 November, 2019;
originally announced November 2019.
