-
The James Webb Space Telescope Mission
Authors:
Jonathan P. Gardner,
John C. Mather,
Randy Abbott,
James S. Abell,
Mark Abernathy,
Faith E. Abney,
John G. Abraham,
Roberto Abraham,
Yasin M. Abul-Huda,
Scott Acton,
Cynthia K. Adams,
Evan Adams,
David S. Adler,
Maarten Adriaensen,
Jonathan Albert Aguilar,
Mansoor Ahmed,
Nasif S. Ahmed,
Tanjira Ahmed,
Rüdeger Albat,
Loïc Albert,
Stacey Alberts,
David Aldridge,
Mary Marsha Allen,
Shaune S. Allen,
Martin Altenburg
, et al. (983 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Twenty-six years ago a small committee report, building on earlier studies, expounded a compelling and poetic vision for the future of astronomy, calling for an infrared-optimized space telescope with an aperture of at least $4m$. With the support of their governments in the US, Europe, and Canada, 20,000 people realized that vision as the $6.5m$ James Webb Space Telescope. A generation of astrono…
▽ More
Twenty-six years ago a small committee report, building on earlier studies, expounded a compelling and poetic vision for the future of astronomy, calling for an infrared-optimized space telescope with an aperture of at least $4m$. With the support of their governments in the US, Europe, and Canada, 20,000 people realized that vision as the $6.5m$ James Webb Space Telescope. A generation of astronomers will celebrate their accomplishments for the life of the mission, potentially as long as 20 years, and beyond. This report and the scientific discoveries that follow are extended thank-you notes to the 20,000 team members. The telescope is working perfectly, with much better image quality than expected. In this and accompanying papers, we give a brief history, describe the observatory, outline its objectives and current observing program, and discuss the inventions and people who made it possible. We cite detailed reports on the design and the measured performance on orbit.
△ Less
Submitted 10 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
-
The Science Performance of JWST as Characterized in Commissioning
Authors:
Jane Rigby,
Marshall Perrin,
Michael McElwain,
Randy Kimble,
Scott Friedman,
Matt Lallo,
René Doyon,
Lee Feinberg,
Pierre Ferruit,
Alistair Glasse,
Marcia Rieke,
George Rieke,
Gillian Wright,
Chris Willott,
Knicole Colon,
Stefanie Milam,
Susan Neff,
Christopher Stark,
Jeff Valenti,
Jim Abell,
Faith Abney,
Yasin Abul-Huda,
D. Scott Acton,
Evan Adams,
David Adler
, et al. (601 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This paper characterizes the actual science performance of the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), as determined from the six month commissioning period. We summarize the performance of the spacecraft, telescope, science instruments, and ground system, with an emphasis on differences from pre-launch expectations. Commissioning has made clear that JWST is fully capable of achieving the discoveries f…
▽ More
This paper characterizes the actual science performance of the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), as determined from the six month commissioning period. We summarize the performance of the spacecraft, telescope, science instruments, and ground system, with an emphasis on differences from pre-launch expectations. Commissioning has made clear that JWST is fully capable of achieving the discoveries for which it was built. Moreover, almost across the board, the science performance of JWST is better than expected; in most cases, JWST will go deeper faster than expected. The telescope and instrument suite have demonstrated the sensitivity, stability, image quality, and spectral range that are necessary to transform our understanding of the cosmos through observations spanning from near-earth asteroids to the most distant galaxies.
△ Less
Submitted 10 April, 2023; v1 submitted 12 July, 2022;
originally announced July 2022.
-
On the need for synthetic data and robust data simulators in the 2020s
Authors:
Molly S. Peeples,
Bjorn Emonts,
Mark Kyprianou,
Matthew T. Penny,
Gregory F. Snyder,
Christopher C. Stark,
Michael Troxel,
Neil T. Zimmerman,
John ZuHone
Abstract:
As observational datasets become larger and more complex, so too are the questions being asked of these data. Data simulations, i.e., synthetic data with properties (pixelization, noise, PSF, artifacts, etc.) akin to real data, are therefore increasingly required for several purposes, including: (1) testing complicated measurement methods, (2) comparing models and astrophysical simulations to obse…
▽ More
As observational datasets become larger and more complex, so too are the questions being asked of these data. Data simulations, i.e., synthetic data with properties (pixelization, noise, PSF, artifacts, etc.) akin to real data, are therefore increasingly required for several purposes, including: (1) testing complicated measurement methods, (2) comparing models and astrophysical simulations to observations in a manner that requires as few assumptions about the data as possible, (3) predicting observational results based on models and astrophysical simulations for, e.g., proposal planning, and (4) mitigating risk for future observatories and missions by effectively priming and testing pipelines. We advocate for an increase in using synthetic data to plan for and interpret real observations as a matter of routine. This will require funding for (1) facilities to provide robust data simulators for their instruments, telescopes, and surveys, and (2) making synthetic data publicly available in archives (much like real data) so as to lower the barrier of entry to all.
△ Less
Submitted 16 July, 2019;
originally announced July 2019.
