Skip to main content

Showing 1–12 of 12 results for author: Kutsenko, A S

.
  1. Statistical analysis of the total magnetic flux decay rate in solar active regions

    Authors: Andrei A. Plotnikov, Valentina I. Abramenko, Alexander S. Kutsenko

    Abstract: We used line-of-sight magnetograms acquired by the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager on board the Solar Dynamics Observatory to derive the decay rate of total unsigned magnetic flux for 910 ephemeral and active regions (ARs) observed between 2010 and 2017. We found that: i) most of the ARs obey the power law dependence between the peak magnetic flux and the magnetic flux decay rate, $DR$, so that… ▽ More

    Submitted 7 March, 2024; v1 submitted 2 March, 2023; originally announced March 2023.

    Comments: Corrections included

  2. The rotation rate of solar active and ephemeral regions -- II. Temporal variations of the rotation rates

    Authors: Alexander S. Kutsenko, Valentina I. Abramenko, Daria V. Litvishko

    Abstract: Systematic studies of the rotation rate of sunspot groups using white-light images yield controversial results on the variations of the rotation rate: sunspot groups were found to either accelerate or decelerate systematically. This disagreement might be related to shortcomings of the method used to probe the rotation rate of sunspot groups. In contrast to previous works, in this study we use magn… ▽ More

    Submitted 30 December, 2022; originally announced December 2022.

    Comments: 10 pages, 5 figures, accepted by MNRAS

  3. arXiv:2105.03886  [pdf, ps, other

    astro-ph.SR

    A statistical study of magnetic flux emergence in solar active regions prior to strongest flares

    Authors: Alexander S. Kutsenko, Valentina I. Abramenko, Andrei A. Plotnikov

    Abstract: Using the data on magnetic field maps and continuum intensity for Solar Cycles 23 and 24, we explored 100 active regions (ARs) that produced M5.0 or stronger flares. We focus on the presence/absence of the emergence of magnetic flux in these ARs 2-3 days before the strong flare onset. We found that 29 ARs in the sample emerged monotonously amidst quiet-Sun. A major emergence of a new magnetic flux… ▽ More

    Submitted 28 February, 2024; v1 submitted 9 May, 2021; originally announced May 2021.

    Comments: 18 pages, 8 figures

  4. On the possibility to probe the flare productivity of an active region on the early stage of emergence

    Authors: Alexander S. Kutsenko, Valentina I. Abramenko, Olga K. Kutsenko

    Abstract: A long-standing problem is to predict the future flare productivity of an active region (AR) when it is on the stage of early emergence. The aim of this study is to probe two parameters of the photospheric magnetic field, both derived during the emergence phase of an AR, and to compare them with the flare productivity of the well-developed AR. The parameters are: (i) the index of the magnetic powe… ▽ More

    Submitted 24 November, 2020; originally announced November 2020.

  5. The rotation rate of solar active and ephemeral regions -- I. Dependence on morphology and peak magnetic flux

    Authors: Alexander S. Kutsenko

    Abstract: Using magnetic field maps acquired by the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager on board the Solar Dynamics Observatory we measured rotation rates of 864 active and 322 ephemeral regions observed between 2010 and 2016. We found smaller magnetic tracers to show a tendency to rotate faster as compared to larger ones. Thus, ephemeral regions exhibit on average the fastest rotation rate. We further divided… ▽ More

    Submitted 24 November, 2020; originally announced November 2020.

  6. Distributed Electric Currents in Solar Active Regions

    Authors: Yuriy A. Fursyak, Alexander S. Kutsenko, Valentina I. Abramenko

    Abstract: Using magnetographic data provided by the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager on board the Solar Dynamics Observatory, we analyzed the structure of magnetic fields and vertical electric currents in six active regions (ARs) with different level of flare activity. We found that electric currents are well balanced over the entire AR: for all of them the current imbalance is below 0.1%, which means that… ▽ More

    Submitted 15 December, 2019; originally announced December 2019.

    Comments: Solar Physics, accepted

  7. Magnetic Power Spectra of Emerging Active Regions

    Authors: Olga K. Kutsenko, Alexander S. Kutsenko, Valentina I. Abramenko

    Abstract: Magnetic field data provided by the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager on board the Solar Dynamics Observatory were utilized to explore the changes in the magnetic energy of four active regions (ARs) during their emergence. We found that at the very early stage of the magnetic flux emergence, an abrupt steepening of the magnetic power spectrum takes place leading to rapid increase of the absolute va… ▽ More

    Submitted 18 July, 2019; originally announced July 2019.

    Comments: accepted by Solar Physics

  8. Extended statistical analysis of emerging solar active regions

    Authors: A. S. Kutsenko, V. I. Abramenko, A. A. Pevtsov

    Abstract: We use observations of line-of-sight magnetograms from Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) on board of Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) to investigate polarity separation, magnetic flux, flux emergence rate, twist and tilt of solar emerging active regions. Functional dependence of polarity separation and maximum magnetic flux of an active region is in agreement with a simple model of flux emerg… ▽ More

    Submitted 29 November, 2018; originally announced November 2018.

    Comments: Accepted by MNRAS

  9. Intermittency spectra of current helicity in solar active regions

    Authors: A. S. Kutsenko, V. I. Abramenko, K. M. Kuzanyan, Haiqing Xu, Hongqi Zhang

    Abstract: We analyse the spatial distribution of current helicity in solar active regions. A comparison of current helicity maps derived from three different instruments (Helioseismic and Magnetc Imager on board the Solar Dynamics Observatory, SDO/HMI, Spectro-Polarimeter on board the Hinode, and Solar Magnetic Field Telescope at the Huairou Solar Observing Station, China, HSOS/SMFT) is carried out. The com… ▽ More

    Submitted 1 August, 2018; v1 submitted 7 February, 2018; originally announced February 2018.

    Comments: accepted by MNRAS

  10. Contribution to the Solar Mean Magnetic Field from Different Solar Regions

    Authors: A. S. Kutsenko, V. I. Abramenko, V. B. Yurchyshyn

    Abstract: Seven-year long seeing-free observations of solar magnetic fields with the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) on board the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) were used to study the sources of the solar mean magnetic field, SMMF, defined as the net line-of-sight magnetic flux divided over the solar disk area. To evaluate the contribution of different regions to the SMMF, we separated all the pixe… ▽ More

    Submitted 19 July, 2017; originally announced July 2017.

    Comments: Solar Physics, accepted

  11. Analysis of the flux growth rate in emerging active regions on the Sun

    Authors: V. I. Abramenko, A. S. Kutsenko, O. I. Tikhonova, V. B. Yurchyshyn

    Abstract: We studied the emergence process of 42 active region (ARs) by analyzing the time derivative, R(t), of the total unsigned flux. Line-of-sight magnetograms acquired by the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) onboard the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) were used. A continuous piecewise linear fitting to the R(t)-profile was applied to detect an interval, dt_2, of nearly-constant R(t) covering one… ▽ More

    Submitted 2 March, 2017; originally announced March 2017.

    Comments: Solar Physics; accepted 16 pages, 8 figures, 1 table

  12. Using SDO/HMI magnetograms as a source of the solar mean magnetic field data

    Authors: A. S. Kutsenko, V. I. Abramenko

    Abstract: The solar mean magnetic field (SMMF) provided by the Wilcox Solar Observatory (WSO) is compared with the SMMF acquired by the \textit{Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager} (HMI) onboard the \textit{Solar Dynamic Observatory} (SDO). We found that despite the different spectral lines and measurement techniques used in both instruments the Pearson correlation coefficient between these two datasets equals… ▽ More

    Submitted 12 June, 2016; originally announced June 2016.

    Comments: 13 pages, 9 figures

    Journal ref: Kutsenko, A.S. & Abramenko, V.I. Sol Phys (2016) 291: 1613