-
Learning low-rank latent mesoscale structures in networks
Authors:
Hanbaek Lyu,
Yacoub H. Kureh,
Joshua Vendrow,
Mason A. Porter
Abstract:
It is common to use networks to encode the architecture of interactions between entities in complex systems in the physical, biological, social, and information sciences. To study the large-scale behavior of complex systems, it is useful to examine mesoscale structures in networks as building blocks that influence such behavior. We present a new approach for describing low-rank mesoscale structure…
▽ More
It is common to use networks to encode the architecture of interactions between entities in complex systems in the physical, biological, social, and information sciences. To study the large-scale behavior of complex systems, it is useful to examine mesoscale structures in networks as building blocks that influence such behavior. We present a new approach for describing low-rank mesoscale structures in networks, and we illustrate our approach using several synthetic network models and empirical friendship, collaboration, and protein--protein interaction (PPI) networks. We find that these networks possess a relatively small number of `latent motifs' that together can successfully approximate most subgraphs of a network at a fixed mesoscale. We use an algorithm for `network dictionary learning' (NDL), which combines a network-sampling method and nonnegative matrix factorization, to learn the latent motifs of a given network. The ability to encode a network using a set of latent motifs has a wide variety of applications to network-analysis tasks, such as comparison, denoising, and edge inference. Additionally, using a new network denoising and reconstruction (NDR) algorithm, we demonstrate how to denoise a corrupted network by using only the latent motifs that one learns directly from the corrupted network.
△ Less
Submitted 13 July, 2023; v1 submitted 13 February, 2021;
originally announced February 2021.
-
A Bounded-Confidence Model of Opinion Dynamics on Hypergraphs
Authors:
Abigail Hickok,
Yacoub Kureh,
Heather Z. Brooks,
Michelle Feng,
Mason A. Porter
Abstract:
People's opinions evolve over time as they interact with their friends, family, colleagues, and others. In the study of opinion dynamics on networks, one often encodes interactions between people in the form of dyadic relationships, but many social interactions in real life are polyadic (i.e., they involve three or more people). In this paper, we extend an asynchronous bounded-confidence model (BC…
▽ More
People's opinions evolve over time as they interact with their friends, family, colleagues, and others. In the study of opinion dynamics on networks, one often encodes interactions between people in the form of dyadic relationships, but many social interactions in real life are polyadic (i.e., they involve three or more people). In this paper, we extend an asynchronous bounded-confidence model (BCM) on graphs, in which nodes are connected pairwise by edges, to an asynchronous BCM on hypergraphs, in which arbitrarily many nodes can be connected by a single hyperedge. We show that our hypergraph BCM converges to consensus under a wide range of initial conditions for the opinions of the nodes, including for non-uniform and asymmetric initial opinion distributions. We also show that, under suitable conditions, echo chambers can form on hypergraphs with community structure. We demonstrate that the opinions of individuals can sometimes jump from one opinion cluster to another in a single time step, a phenomenon (which we call ``opinion jum**'') that is not possible in standard dyadic BCMs. Additionally, we observe that there is a phase transition in the convergence time on {a complete hypergraph} when the variance $σ^2$ of the initial opinion distribution equals the confidence bound $c$. We prove that the convergence time grows at least exponentially fast with the number of nodes when $σ^2 > c$ and the initial opinions are normally distributed. Therefore, to determine the convergence properties of our hypergraph BCM when the variance and the number of hyperedges are both large, it is necessary to use analytical methods instead of relying only on Monte Carlo simulations.
△ Less
Submitted 9 August, 2021; v1 submitted 12 February, 2021;
originally announced February 2021.
-
Disease Detectives: Using Mathematics to Forecast the Spread of Infectious Diseases
Authors:
Heather Z. Brooks,
Unchitta Kanjanasaratool,
Yacoub H. Kureh,
Mason A. Porter
Abstract:
The COVID-19 pandemic has led to significant changes in how people are currently living their lives. To determine how to best reduce the effects of the pandemic and start reopening societies, governments have drawn insights from mathematical models of the spread of infectious diseases. In this article, we give an introduction to a family of mathematical models (called "compartmental models") and d…
▽ More
The COVID-19 pandemic has led to significant changes in how people are currently living their lives. To determine how to best reduce the effects of the pandemic and start reopening societies, governments have drawn insights from mathematical models of the spread of infectious diseases. In this article, we give an introduction to a family of mathematical models (called "compartmental models") and discuss how the results of analyzing these models influence government policies and human behavior, such as encouraging mask wearing and physical distancing to help slow the spread of the disease.
△ Less
Submitted 6 September, 2020; v1 submitted 30 June, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
-
Connecting the Dots: Discovering the "Shape" of Data
Authors:
Michelle Feng,
Abigail Hickok,
Yacoub H. Kureh,
Mason A. Porter,
Chad M. Topaz
Abstract:
Scientists use a mathematical subject called 'topology' to study the shapes of objects. An important part of topology is counting the numbers of pieces and holes in objects, and people use this information to group objects into different types. For example, a doughnut has the same number of holes and the same number of pieces as a teacup with one handle, but it is different from a ball. In studies…
▽ More
Scientists use a mathematical subject called 'topology' to study the shapes of objects. An important part of topology is counting the numbers of pieces and holes in objects, and people use this information to group objects into different types. For example, a doughnut has the same number of holes and the same number of pieces as a teacup with one handle, but it is different from a ball. In studies that resemble activities like "connect the dots", scientists use ideas from topology to study the shape of data. Data can take many possible forms: a picture made of dots, a large collection of numbers from a scientific experiment, or something else. The approach in these studies is called 'topological data analysis', and it has been used to study the branching structures of veins in leaves, how people vote in elections, flight patterns in models of bird flocking, and more. Scientists can take data on the way veins branch on leaves and use topological data analysis to divide the leaves into different groups and discover patterns that may otherwise be hard to find.
△ Less
Submitted 8 September, 2020; v1 submitted 13 April, 2020;
originally announced April 2020.
-
Fitting In and Breaking Up: A Nonlinear Version of Coevolving Voter Models
Authors:
Yacoub H. Kureh,
Mason A. Porter
Abstract:
We investigate a nonlinear version of coevolving voter models, in which node states and network structure update as a coupled stochastic dynamical process. Most prior work on coevolving voter models has focused on linear update rules with fixed and homogeneous rewiring and adopting probabilities. By contrast, in our nonlinear version, the probability that a node rewires or adopts is a function of…
▽ More
We investigate a nonlinear version of coevolving voter models, in which node states and network structure update as a coupled stochastic dynamical process. Most prior work on coevolving voter models has focused on linear update rules with fixed and homogeneous rewiring and adopting probabilities. By contrast, in our nonlinear version, the probability that a node rewires or adopts is a function of how well it "fits in" within its neighborhood. To explore this idea, we incorporate a parameter $σ$ that represents the fraction of neighbors of an updating node that share its opinion state. In an update, with probability $σ^q$ (for some nonlinearity parameter $q$), the updating node rewires; with complementary probability $1-σ^q$, the updating node adopts a new opinion state. We study this mechanism using three rewiring schemes: after an updating node deletes a discordant edge, it then either (1) "rewires-to-random" by choosing a new neighbor in a random process; (2) "rewires-to-same" by choosing a new neighbor in a random process from nodes that share its state; or (3) "rewires-to-none" by not rewiring at all (akin to "unfriending" on social media). We compare our nonlinear coevolving model to several existing linear models, and we find in our model that initial network topology plays a larger role in the dynamics and the choice of rewiring mechanism plays a smaller role. A particularly interesting feature of our model is that, under certain conditions, the opinion state that is held initially by a minority of the nodes can effectively spread to almost every node in a network if the minority nodes view themselves as the majority. In light of this observation, we relate our results to recent work on the majority illusion in social networks.
△ Less
Submitted 6 February, 2020; v1 submitted 26 July, 2019;
originally announced July 2019.
