The association between neighborhood obesogenic factors and prostate cancer risk and mortality: the Southern Community Cohort Study
Authors:
Fekede Asefa Kumsa,
Jay H. Fowke,
Soheil Hashtarkhani,
Brianna M. White,
Martha J. Shrubsole,
Arash Shaban-Nejad
Abstract:
Prostate cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality among men in the U.S. We examined the role of neighborhood obesogenic attributes on prostate cancer risk and mortality in the Southern Community Cohort Study (SCCS). From 34,166 SCCS male participants, 28,356 were included in the analysis. We assessed relationship between neighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES) and neighborh…
▽ More
Prostate cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality among men in the U.S. We examined the role of neighborhood obesogenic attributes on prostate cancer risk and mortality in the Southern Community Cohort Study (SCCS). From 34,166 SCCS male participants, 28,356 were included in the analysis. We assessed relationship between neighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES) and neighborhood obesogenic environment indices including restaurant environment index, retail food environment index, parks, recreational facilities, and businesses and prostate cancer risk and mortality by controlling for individual-level factors using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model. We further stratified prostate cancer risk analysis by race and body mass index (BMI). Median follow-up time was 133 months, and mean age was 51.62 years. There were 1,524 (5.37%) prostate cancer diagnoses and 98 (6.43%) prostate cancer deaths during follow-up. Compared to participants residing in wealthiest quintile, those residing in the poorest quintile had a higher risk of prostate cancer, particularly among non-obese men with a BMI less than 30. The restaurant environment index was associated with a higher prostate cancer risk in overweight (BMI equal or greater 25) White men. Obese Black individuals without any neighborhood recreational facilities had a 42% higher risk compared to those with any access. Compared to residents in wealthiest quintile and most walkable area, those residing within the poorest quintile or the least walkable area had a higher risk of prostate cancer death.
△ Less
Submitted 28 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
Medication abortion via digital health in the United States: a systematic sco** review
Authors:
Fekede Asefa Kumsa,
Rameshwari Prasad,
Arash Shaban-Nejad
Abstract:
Digital health, including telemedicine, has increased access to abortion care. The convenience, flexibility of appointment times, and ensured privacy to abortion users may make abortion services via telemedicine preferable. This sco** review systematically mapped studies conducted on abortion services via telemedicine, including their effectiveness and acceptability for abortion users and provid…
▽ More
Digital health, including telemedicine, has increased access to abortion care. The convenience, flexibility of appointment times, and ensured privacy to abortion users may make abortion services via telemedicine preferable. This sco** review systematically mapped studies conducted on abortion services via telemedicine, including their effectiveness and acceptability for abortion users and providers. All published papers included abortion services via telemedicine in the United States were considered. Articles were searched in PubMed, CINAHL, and Google Scholar databases in September 2022. The findings were synthesized narratively, and the PRISMA-ScR guidelines were used to report this study. Out of 757 retrieved articles, 33 articles were selected based on the inclusion criteria. These studies were published between 2011 and 2022, with 24 published in the last 3 years. The study found that telemedicine increased access to abortion care in the United States, especially for people in remote areas or those worried about stigma from in-person visits. The effectiveness of abortion services via telemedicine was comparable to in-clinic visits, with 6% or fewer abortions requiring surgical intervention. Both care providers and abortion seekers expressed positive perceptions of telemedicine-based abortion services. However, abortion users reported mixed emotions, with some preferring in-person visits. The most common reasons for choosing telemedicine included the distance to the abortion clinic, convenience, privacy, cost, flexibility of appointment times, and state laws imposing waiting periods or restrictive policies. Telemedicine offered a preferable option for abortion seekers and providers. The feasibility of accessing abortion services via telemedicine in low-resource settings needs further investigation.
△ Less
Submitted 18 July, 2023;
originally announced December 2023.
