Generative AI as a metacognitive agent: A comparative mixed-method study with human participants on ICF-mimicking exam performance
Authors:
Jelena Pavlovic,
Jugoslav Krstic,
Luka Mitrovic,
Djordje Babic,
Adrijana Milosavljevic,
Milena Nikolic,
Tijana Karaklic,
Tijana Mitrovic
Abstract:
This study investigates the metacognitive capabilities of Large Language Models relative to human metacognition in the context of the International Coaching Federation ICF mimicking exam, a situational judgment test related to coaching competencies. Using a mixed method approach, we assessed the metacognitive performance, including sensitivity, accuracy in probabilistic predictions, and bias, of h…
▽ More
This study investigates the metacognitive capabilities of Large Language Models relative to human metacognition in the context of the International Coaching Federation ICF mimicking exam, a situational judgment test related to coaching competencies. Using a mixed method approach, we assessed the metacognitive performance, including sensitivity, accuracy in probabilistic predictions, and bias, of human participants and five advanced LLMs (GPT-4, Claude-3-Opus 3, Mistral Large, Llama 3, and Gemini 1.5 Pro). The results indicate that LLMs outperformed humans across all metacognitive metrics, particularly in terms of reduced overconfidence, compared to humans. However, both LLMs and humans showed less adaptability in ambiguous scenarios, adhering closely to predefined decision frameworks. The study suggests that Generative AI can effectively engage in human-like metacognitive processing without conscious awareness. Implications of the study are discussed in relation to development of AI simulators that scaffold cognitive and metacognitive aspects of mastering coaching competencies. More broadly, implications of these results are discussed in relation to development of metacognitive modules that lead towards more autonomous and intuitive AI systems.
△ Less
Submitted 7 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
Expected Performance of the ATLAS Experiment - Detector, Trigger and Physics
Authors:
The ATLAS Collaboration,
G. Aad,
E. Abat,
B. Abbott,
J. Abdallah,
A. A. Abdelalim,
A. Abdesselam,
O. Abdinov,
B. Abi,
M. Abolins,
H. Abramowicz,
B. S. Acharya,
D. L. Adams,
T. N. Addy,
C. Adorisio,
P. Adragna,
T. Adye,
J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra,
M. Aharrouche,
S. P. Ahlen,
F. Ahles,
A. Ahmad,
H. Ahmed,
G. Aielli,
T. Akdogan
, et al. (2587 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
A detailed study is presented of the expected performance of the ATLAS detector. The reconstruction of tracks, leptons, photons, missing energy and jets is investigated, together with the performance of b-tagging and the trigger. The physics potential for a variety of interesting physics processes, within the Standard Model and beyond, is examined. The study comprises a series of notes based on…
▽ More
A detailed study is presented of the expected performance of the ATLAS detector. The reconstruction of tracks, leptons, photons, missing energy and jets is investigated, together with the performance of b-tagging and the trigger. The physics potential for a variety of interesting physics processes, within the Standard Model and beyond, is examined. The study comprises a series of notes based on simulations of the detector and physics processes, with particular emphasis given to the data expected from the first years of operation of the LHC at CERN.
△ Less
Submitted 14 August, 2009; v1 submitted 28 December, 2008;
originally announced January 2009.
