Showing 1–3 of 3 results for author: Kravitz, E

Adversarially-Trained Deep Nets Transfer Better: Illustration on Image Classification

Authors: Francisco Utrera, Evan Kravitz, N. Benjamin Erichson, Rajiv Khanna, Michael W. Mahoney

Abstract: Transfer learning has emerged as a powerful methodology for adapting pre-trained deep neural networks on image recognition tasks to new domains. This process consists of taking a neural network pre-trained on a large feature-rich source dataset, freezing the early layers that encode essential generic image properties, and then fine-tuning the last few layers in order to capture specific informatio… ▽ More Transfer learning has emerged as a powerful methodology for adapting pre-trained deep neural networks on image recognition tasks to new domains. This process consists of taking a neural network pre-trained on a large feature-rich source dataset, freezing the early layers that encode essential generic image properties, and then fine-tuning the last few layers in order to capture specific information related to the target situation. This approach is particularly useful when only limited or weakly labeled data are available for the new task. In this work, we demonstrate that adversarially-trained models transfer better than non-adversarially-trained models, especially if only limited data are available for the new domain task. Further, we observe that adversarial training biases the learnt representations to retaining shapes, as opposed to textures, which impacts the transferability of the source models. Finally, through the lens of influence functions, we discover that transferred adversarially-trained models contain more human-identifiable semantic information, which explains -- at least partly -- why adversarially-trained models transfer better. △ Less

Submitted 23 April, 2021; v1 submitted 11 July, 2020; originally announced July 2020.

Comments: Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2021

Finite Sample Hypothesis Tests for Stacked Estimating Equations

Authors: Eli S. Kravitz, Raymond J. Carroll, David Ruppert

Abstract: Suppose there are two unknown parameters, each parameter is the solution to an estimating equation, and the estimating equation of one parameter depends on the other parameter. The parameters can be jointly estimated by "stacking" their estimating equations and solving for both parameters simultaneously. Asymptotic confidence intervals are readily available for stacked estimating equations. We int… ▽ More Suppose there are two unknown parameters, each parameter is the solution to an estimating equation, and the estimating equation of one parameter depends on the other parameter. The parameters can be jointly estimated by "stacking" their estimating equations and solving for both parameters simultaneously. Asymptotic confidence intervals are readily available for stacked estimating equations. We introduce a bootstrap-based hypothesis test for stacked estimating equations which does not rely on asymptotic approximations. Test statistics are constructed by splitting the sample in two, estimating the first parameter on a portion of the sample then plugging the result into the second estimating equation to solve for the next parameter using the remaining sample. To reduce simulation variability from a single split, we repeatedly split the sample and take the sample mean of all the estimates. For parametric models, we derive the limiting distribution of sample splitting estimator and show they are equivalent to stacked estimating equations. △ Less

Submitted 11 August, 2019; originally announced August 2019.

Comments: preprint. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1908.03967

Sample Splitting as an M-Estimator with Application to Physical Activity Scoring

Authors: Eli S. Kravitz, Raymond J. Carroll, David Ruppert

Abstract: Sample splitting is widely used in statistical applications, including classically in classification and more recently for inference post model selection. Motivating by problems in the study of diet, physical activity, and health, we consider a new application of sample splitting. Physical activity researchers wanted to create a scoring system to quickly assess physical activity levels. A score is… ▽ More Sample splitting is widely used in statistical applications, including classically in classification and more recently for inference post model selection. Motivating by problems in the study of diet, physical activity, and health, we consider a new application of sample splitting. Physical activity researchers wanted to create a scoring system to quickly assess physical activity levels. A score is created using a large cohort study. Then, using the same data, this score serves as a covariate in a model for the risk of disease or mortality. Since the data are used twice in this way, standard errors and confidence intervals from fitting the second model are not valid. To allow for proper inference, sample splitting can be used. One builds the score with a random half of the data and then uses the score when fitting a model to the other half of the data. We derive the limiting distribution of the estimators. An obvious question is what happens if multiple sample splits are performed. We show that as the number of sample splits increases, the combination of multiple sample splits is effectively equivalent to solving a set of estimating equations. △ Less

Submitted 11 August, 2019; originally announced August 2019.

Comments: preprint. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1908.03968