-
Analysis Facilities White Paper
Authors:
D. Ciangottini,
A. Forti,
L. Heinrich,
N. Skidmore,
C. Alpigiani,
M. Aly,
D. Benjamin,
B. Bockelman,
L. Bryant,
J. Catmore,
M. D'Alfonso,
A. Delgado Peris,
C. Doglioni,
G. Duckeck,
P. Elmer,
J. Eschle,
M. Feickert,
J. Frost,
R. Gardner,
V. Garonne,
M. Giffels,
J. Gooding,
E. Gramstad,
L. Gray,
B. Hegner
, et al. (41 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This white paper presents the current status of the R&D for Analysis Facilities (AFs) and attempts to summarize the views on the future direction of these facilities. These views have been collected through the High Energy Physics (HEP) Software Foundation's (HSF) Analysis Facilities forum, established in March 2022, the Analysis Ecosystems II workshop, that took place in May 2022, and the WLCG/HS…
▽ More
This white paper presents the current status of the R&D for Analysis Facilities (AFs) and attempts to summarize the views on the future direction of these facilities. These views have been collected through the High Energy Physics (HEP) Software Foundation's (HSF) Analysis Facilities forum, established in March 2022, the Analysis Ecosystems II workshop, that took place in May 2022, and the WLCG/HSF pre-CHEP workshop, that took place in May 2023. The paper attempts to cover all the aspects of an analysis facility.
△ Less
Submitted 15 April, 2024; v1 submitted 2 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
New directions for surrogate models and differentiable programming for High Energy Physics detector simulation
Authors:
Andreas Adelmann,
Walter Hopkins,
Evangelos Kourlitis,
Michael Kagan,
Gregor Kasieczka,
Claudius Krause,
David Shih,
Vinicius Mikuni,
Benjamin Nachman,
Kevin Pedro,
Daniel Winklehner
Abstract:
The computational cost for high energy physics detector simulation in future experimental facilities is going to exceed the current available resources. To overcome this challenge, new ideas on surrogate models using machine learning methods are being explored to replace computationally expensive components. Additionally, differentiable programming has been proposed as a complementary approach, pr…
▽ More
The computational cost for high energy physics detector simulation in future experimental facilities is going to exceed the current available resources. To overcome this challenge, new ideas on surrogate models using machine learning methods are being explored to replace computationally expensive components. Additionally, differentiable programming has been proposed as a complementary approach, providing controllable and scalable simulation routines. In this document, new and ongoing efforts for surrogate models and differential programming applied to detector simulation are discussed in the context of the 2021 Particle Physics Community Planning Exercise (`Snowmass').
△ Less
Submitted 15 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Detector and Beamline Simulation for Next-Generation High Energy Physics Experiments
Authors:
Sunanda Banerjee,
D. N. Brown,
David N. Brown,
Paolo Calafiura,
Jacob Calcutt,
Philippe Canal,
Miriam Diamond,
Daniel Elvira,
Thomas Evans,
Renee Fatemi,
Krzysztof Genser,
Robert Hatcher,
Alexander Himmel,
Seth R. Johnson,
Soon Yung Jun,
Michael Kelsey,
Evangelos Kourlitis,
Robert K. Kutschke,
Guilherme Lima,
Kevin Lynch,
Kendall Mahn,
Zachary Marshall,
Michael Mooney,
Adam Para,
Vincent R. Pascuzzi
, et al. (9 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The success of high energy physics programs relies heavily on accurate detector simulations and beam interaction modeling. The increasingly complex detector geometries and beam dynamics require sophisticated techniques in order to meet the demands of current and future experiments. Common software tools used today are unable to fully utilize modern computational resources, while data-recording rat…
▽ More
The success of high energy physics programs relies heavily on accurate detector simulations and beam interaction modeling. The increasingly complex detector geometries and beam dynamics require sophisticated techniques in order to meet the demands of current and future experiments. Common software tools used today are unable to fully utilize modern computational resources, while data-recording rates are often orders of magnitude larger than what can be produced via simulation. In this paper, we describe the state, current and future needs of high energy physics detector and beamline simulations and related challenges, and we propose a number of possible ways to address them.
△ Less
Submitted 20 April, 2022; v1 submitted 14 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.