SleepPPG-Net: a deep learning algorithm for robust sleep staging from continuous photoplethysmography
Authors:
Kevin Kotzen,
Peter H. Charlton,
Sharon Salabi,
Lea Amar,
Amir Landesberg,
Joachim A. Behar
Abstract:
Introduction: Sleep staging is an essential component in the diagnosis of sleep disorders and management of sleep health. It is traditionally measured in a clinical setting and requires a labor-intensive labeling process. We hypothesize that it is possible to perform robust 4-class sleep staging using the raw photoplethysmography (PPG) time series and modern advances in deep learning (DL). Methods…
▽ More
Introduction: Sleep staging is an essential component in the diagnosis of sleep disorders and management of sleep health. It is traditionally measured in a clinical setting and requires a labor-intensive labeling process. We hypothesize that it is possible to perform robust 4-class sleep staging using the raw photoplethysmography (PPG) time series and modern advances in deep learning (DL). Methods: We used two publicly available sleep databases that included raw PPG recordings, totalling 2,374 patients and 23,055 hours. We developed SleepPPG-Net, a DL model for 4-class sleep staging from the raw PPG time series. SleepPPG-Net was trained end-to-end and consists of a residual convolutional network for automatic feature extraction and a temporal convolutional network to capture long-range contextual information. We benchmarked the performance of SleepPPG-Net against models based on the best-reported state-of-the-art (SOTA) algorithms. Results: When benchmarked on a held-out test set, SleepPPG-Net obtained a median Cohen's Kappa ($κ$) score of 0.75 against 0.69 for the best SOTA approach. SleepPPG-Net showed good generalization performance to an external database, obtaining a $κ$ score of 0.74 after transfer learning. Perspective: Overall, SleepPPG-Net provides new SOTA performance. In addition, performance is high enough to open the path to the development of wearables that meet the requirements for usage in clinical applications such as the diagnosis and monitoring of obstructive sleep apnea.
△ Less
Submitted 29 April, 2022; v1 submitted 11 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
Remote health monitoring and diagnosis in the time of COVID-19
Authors:
Joachim A. Behar,
Chengyu Liu,
Kevin Kotzen,
Kenta Tsutsui,
Valentina D. A. Corino,
Janmajay Singh,
Marco A. F. Pimentel,
Philip Warrick,
Sebastian Zaunseder,
Fernando Andreotti,
David Sebag,
Georgy Popanitsa,
Patrick E. McSharry,
Walter Karlen,
Chandan Karmakar,
Gari D. Clifford
Abstract:
Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) that is rapidly spreading across the globe. The clinical spectrum of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia ranges from mild to critically ill cases and requires early detection and monitoring, within a clinical environment for critical cases and remotely for mild cases. The fear of contamination in clinical…
▽ More
Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) that is rapidly spreading across the globe. The clinical spectrum of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia ranges from mild to critically ill cases and requires early detection and monitoring, within a clinical environment for critical cases and remotely for mild cases. The fear of contamination in clinical environments has led to a dramatic reduction in on-site referrals for routine care. There has also been a perceived need to continuously monitor non-severe COVID- 19 patients, either from their quarantine site at home, or dedicated quarantine locations (e.g., hotels). Thus, the pandemic has driven incentives to innovate and enhance or create new routes for providing healthcare services at distance. In particular, this has created a dramatic impetus to find innovative ways to remotely and effectively monitor patient health status. In this paper we present a short review of remote health monitoring initiatives taken in 19 states during the time of the pandemic. We emphasize in the discussion particular aspects that are common ground for the reviewed states, in particular the future impact of the pandemic on remote health monitoring and consideration on data privacy.
△ Less
Submitted 15 October, 2020; v1 submitted 18 May, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
