Data harvesting vs data farming: A study of the importance of variation vs sample size in deep learning-based auto-segmentation for breast cancer patients
Authors:
ES Buhl,
E Maae,
LW Matthiessen,
MH Nielsen,
M Maraldo,
M Møller,
S Elleberg,
SAJ Al-Rawi,
BV Offersen,
SS Korreman
Abstract:
The aim of this study was to investigate the difference in output, when training a model in three different scenarios: a large clinical delineated data set (with 700/78 patients for training/testing, from the Danish Breast Cancer Group (DBCG) RT Nation Study), a clinical but curated dataset (with 328/36 patients for training/testing, from the DBCG RT Nation Study) and a smaller, but dedicated data…
▽ More
The aim of this study was to investigate the difference in output, when training a model in three different scenarios: a large clinical delineated data set (with 700/78 patients for training/testing, from the Danish Breast Cancer Group (DBCG) RT Nation Study), a clinical but curated dataset (with 328/36 patients for training/testing, from the DBCG RT Nation Study) and a smaller, but dedicated data set created by delineation experts (with 123/14 patients for training/testing, consensus delineations created by delineation experts). The model performance was estimated based on the performance metrics dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff 95th percentile (HD95) and mean surface distance (MSD). Models were tested in test sets from their own cohort, and afterwards also compared in the dedicated data test set. The difference between model output was finally estimated by measuring the mean width and cranial caudal length of the model output for the models. When testing the model output between the clinical models and the dedicated models in their own test set, the two clinical models had a poorer performance, than the dedicated models, but not all metrics showed statistically significance. When testing the models in the dedicated data, the dedicated model showed a slightly better performance, along with fewer segmentation outliers. As a way of taking advantage of the strength from both types of data set, it could be an option to use a large clinical data set as a baseline model, and then finetune with smaller sized cohorts with dedicated delineations.
△ Less
Submitted 4 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
Segment anything model for head and neck tumor segmentation with CT, PET and MRI multi-modality images
Authors:
**tao Ren,
Mathis Rasmussen,
Jasper Nijkamp,
Jesper Grau Eriksen,
Stine Korreman
Abstract:
Deep learning presents novel opportunities for the auto-segmentation of gross tumor volume (GTV) in head and neck cancer (HNC), yet fully automatic methods usually necessitate significant manual refinement. This study investigates the Segment Anything Model (SAM), recognized for requiring minimal human prompting and its zero-shot generalization ability across natural images. We specifically examin…
▽ More
Deep learning presents novel opportunities for the auto-segmentation of gross tumor volume (GTV) in head and neck cancer (HNC), yet fully automatic methods usually necessitate significant manual refinement. This study investigates the Segment Anything Model (SAM), recognized for requiring minimal human prompting and its zero-shot generalization ability across natural images. We specifically examine MedSAM, a version of SAM fine-tuned with large-scale public medical images. Despite its progress, the integration of multi-modality images (CT, PET, MRI) for effective GTV delineation remains a challenge. Focusing on SAM's application in HNC GTV segmentation, we assess its performance in both zero-shot and fine-tuned scenarios using single (CT-only) and fused multi-modality images. Our study demonstrates that fine-tuning SAM significantly enhances its segmentation accuracy, building upon the already effective zero-shot results achieved with bounding box prompts. These findings open a promising avenue for semi-automatic HNC GTV segmentation.
△ Less
Submitted 27 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
