-
Towards Reliable Latent Knowledge Estimation in LLMs: In-Context Learning vs. Prompting Based Factual Knowledge Extraction
Authors:
Qinyuan Wu,
Mohammad Aflah Khan,
Soumi Das,
Vedant Nanda,
Bishwamittra Ghosh,
Camila Kolling,
Till Speicher,
Laurent Bindschaedler,
Krishna P. Gummadi,
Evimaria Terzi
Abstract:
We propose an approach for estimating the latent knowledge embedded inside large language models (LLMs). We leverage the in-context learning (ICL) abilities of LLMs to estimate the extent to which an LLM knows the facts stored in a knowledge base. Our knowledge estimator avoids reliability concerns with previous prompting-based methods, is both conceptually simpler and easier to apply, and we demo…
▽ More
We propose an approach for estimating the latent knowledge embedded inside large language models (LLMs). We leverage the in-context learning (ICL) abilities of LLMs to estimate the extent to which an LLM knows the facts stored in a knowledge base. Our knowledge estimator avoids reliability concerns with previous prompting-based methods, is both conceptually simpler and easier to apply, and we demonstrate that it can surface more of the latent knowledge embedded in LLMs. We also investigate how different design choices affect the performance of ICL-based knowledge estimation. Using the proposed estimator, we perform a large-scale evaluation of the factual knowledge of a variety of open source LLMs, like OPT, Pythia, Llama(2), Mistral, Gemma, etc. over a large set of relations and facts from the Wikidata knowledge base. We observe differences in the factual knowledge between different model families and models of different sizes, that some relations are consistently better known than others but that models differ in the precise facts they know, and differences in the knowledge of base models and their finetuned counterparts.
△ Less
Submitted 19 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
Pointwise Representational Similarity
Authors:
Camila Kolling,
Till Speicher,
Vedant Nanda,
Mariya Toneva,
Krishna P. Gummadi
Abstract:
With the increasing reliance on deep neural networks, it is important to develop ways to better understand their learned representations. Representation similarity measures have emerged as a popular tool for examining learned representations However, existing measures only provide aggregate estimates of similarity at a global level, i.e. over a set of representations for N input examples. As such,…
▽ More
With the increasing reliance on deep neural networks, it is important to develop ways to better understand their learned representations. Representation similarity measures have emerged as a popular tool for examining learned representations However, existing measures only provide aggregate estimates of similarity at a global level, i.e. over a set of representations for N input examples. As such, these measures are not well-suited for investigating representations at a local level, i.e. representations of a single input example. Local similarity measures are needed, for instance, to understand which individual input representations are affected by training interventions to models (e.g. to be more fair and unbiased) or are at greater risk of being misclassified. In this work, we fill in this gap and propose Pointwise Normalized Kernel Alignment (PNKA), a measure that quantifies how similarly an individual input is represented in two representation spaces. Intuitively, PNKA compares the similarity of an input's neighborhoods across both spaces. Using our measure, we are able to analyze properties of learned representations at a finer granularity than what was previously possible. Concretely, we show how PNKA can be leveraged to develop a deeper understanding of (a) the input examples that are likely to be misclassified, (b) the concepts encoded by (individual) neurons in a layer, and (c) the effects of fairness interventions on learned representations.
△ Less
Submitted 30 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
-
Measuring Representational Robustness of Neural Networks Through Shared Invariances
Authors:
Vedant Nanda,
Till Speicher,
Camila Kolling,
John P. Dickerson,
Krishna P. Gummadi,
Adrian Weller
Abstract:
A major challenge in studying robustness in deep learning is defining the set of ``meaningless'' perturbations to which a given Neural Network (NN) should be invariant. Most work on robustness implicitly uses a human as the reference model to define such perturbations. Our work offers a new view on robustness by using another reference NN to define the set of perturbations a given NN should be inv…
▽ More
A major challenge in studying robustness in deep learning is defining the set of ``meaningless'' perturbations to which a given Neural Network (NN) should be invariant. Most work on robustness implicitly uses a human as the reference model to define such perturbations. Our work offers a new view on robustness by using another reference NN to define the set of perturbations a given NN should be invariant to, thus generalizing the reliance on a reference ``human NN'' to any NN. This makes measuring robustness equivalent to measuring the extent to which two NNs share invariances, for which we propose a measure called STIR. STIR re-purposes existing representation similarity measures to make them suitable for measuring shared invariances. Using our measure, we are able to gain insights into how shared invariances vary with changes in weight initialization, architecture, loss functions, and training dataset. Our implementation is available at: \url{https://github.com/nvedant07/STIR}.
△ Less
Submitted 23 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
-
Mitigating Bias in Facial Analysis Systems by Incorporating Label Diversity
Authors:
Camila Kolling,
Victor Araujo,
Adriano Veloso,
Soraia Raupp Musse
Abstract:
Facial analysis models are increasingly applied in real-world applications that have significant impact on peoples' lives. However, as literature has shown, models that automatically classify facial attributes might exhibit algorithmic discrimination behavior with respect to protected groups, potentially posing negative impacts on individuals and society. It is therefore critical to develop techni…
▽ More
Facial analysis models are increasingly applied in real-world applications that have significant impact on peoples' lives. However, as literature has shown, models that automatically classify facial attributes might exhibit algorithmic discrimination behavior with respect to protected groups, potentially posing negative impacts on individuals and society. It is therefore critical to develop techniques that can mitigate unintended biases in facial classifiers. Hence, in this work, we introduce a novel learning method that combines both subjective human-based labels and objective annotations based on mathematical definitions of facial traits. Specifically, we generate new objective annotations from two large-scale human-annotated dataset, each capturing a different perspective of the analyzed facial trait. We then propose an ensemble learning method, which combines individual models trained on different types of annotations. We provide an in-depth analysis of the annotation procedure as well as the datasets distribution. Moreover, we empirically demonstrate that, by incorporating label diversity, our method successfully mitigates unintended biases, while maintaining significant accuracy on the downstream tasks.
△ Less
Submitted 14 June, 2022; v1 submitted 13 April, 2022;
originally announced April 2022.
-
Do Invariances in Deep Neural Networks Align with Human Perception?
Authors:
Vedant Nanda,
Ayan Majumdar,
Camila Kolling,
John P. Dickerson,
Krishna P. Gummadi,
Bradley C. Love,
Adrian Weller
Abstract:
An evaluation criterion for safe and trustworthy deep learning is how well the invariances captured by representations of deep neural networks (DNNs) are shared with humans. We identify challenges in measuring these invariances. Prior works used gradient-based methods to generate identically represented inputs (IRIs), ie, inputs which have identical representations (on a given layer) of a neural n…
▽ More
An evaluation criterion for safe and trustworthy deep learning is how well the invariances captured by representations of deep neural networks (DNNs) are shared with humans. We identify challenges in measuring these invariances. Prior works used gradient-based methods to generate identically represented inputs (IRIs), ie, inputs which have identical representations (on a given layer) of a neural network, and thus capture invariances of a given network. One necessary criterion for a network's invariances to align with human perception is for its IRIs look 'similar' to humans. Prior works, however, have mixed takeaways; some argue that later layers of DNNs do not learn human-like invariances (\cite{jenelle2019metamers}) yet others seem to indicate otherwise (\cite{mahendran2014understanding}). We argue that the loss function used to generate IRIs can heavily affect takeaways about invariances of the network and is the primary reason for these conflicting findings. We propose an adversarial regularizer on the IRI generation loss that finds IRIs that make any model appear to have very little shared invariance with humans. Based on this evidence, we argue that there is scope for improving models to have human-like invariances, and further, to have meaningful comparisons between models one should use IRIs generated using the regularizer-free loss. We then conduct an in-depth investigation of how different components (eg architectures, training losses, data augmentations) of the deep learning pipeline contribute to learning models that have good alignment with humans. We find that architectures with residual connections trained using a (self-supervised) contrastive loss with $\ell_p$ ball adversarial data augmentation tend to learn invariances that are most aligned with humans. Code: \url{github.com/nvedant07/Human-NN-Alignment}.
△ Less
Submitted 2 December, 2022; v1 submitted 29 November, 2021;
originally announced November 2021.
-
Component Analysis for Visual Question Answering Architectures
Authors:
Camila Kolling,
Jônatas Wehrmann,
Rodrigo C. Barros
Abstract:
Recent research advances in Computer Vision and Natural Language Processing have introduced novel tasks that are paving the way for solving AI-complete problems. One of those tasks is called Visual Question Answering (VQA). A VQA system must take an image and a free-form, open-ended natural language question about the image, and produce a natural language answer as the output. Such a task has draw…
▽ More
Recent research advances in Computer Vision and Natural Language Processing have introduced novel tasks that are paving the way for solving AI-complete problems. One of those tasks is called Visual Question Answering (VQA). A VQA system must take an image and a free-form, open-ended natural language question about the image, and produce a natural language answer as the output. Such a task has drawn great attention from the scientific community, which generated a plethora of approaches that aim to improve the VQA predictive accuracy. Most of them comprise three major components: (i) independent representation learning of images and questions; (ii) feature fusion so the model can use information from both sources to answer visual questions; and (iii) the generation of the correct answer in natural language. With so many approaches being recently introduced, it became unclear the real contribution of each component for the ultimate performance of the model. The main goal of this paper is to provide a comprehensive analysis regarding the impact of each component in VQA models. Our extensive set of experiments cover both visual and textual elements, as well as the combination of these representations in form of fusion and attention mechanisms. Our major contribution is to identify core components for training VQA models so as to maximize their predictive performance.
△ Less
Submitted 26 March, 2020; v1 submitted 12 February, 2020;
originally announced February 2020.
