-
Massive search of spot- and facula-crossing events in 1598 exoplanetary transit lightcurves
Authors:
R. V. Baluev,
E. N. Sokov,
I. A. Sokova,
V. Sh. Shaidulin,
A. V. Veselova,
V. N. Aitov,
G. Sh. Mitiani,
A. F. Valeev,
D. R. Gadelshin,
A. G. Gutaev,
G. M. Beskin,
G. G. Valyavin,
K. Antonyuk,
K. Barkaoui,
M. Gillon,
E. Jehin,
L. Delrez,
S. Guðmundsson,
H. A. Dale,
E. Fernández-Lajús,
R. P. Di Sisto,
M. Bretton,
A. Wunsche,
V. -P. Hentunen,
S. Shadick
, et al. (18 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We developed a dedicated statistical test for a massive detection of spot- and facula-crossing anomalies in multiple exoplanetary transit lightcurves, based on the frequentist $p$-value thresholding. This test was used to augment our algorithmic pipeline for transit lightcurves analysis. It was applied to $1598$ amateur and professional transit observations of $26$ targets being monitored in the E…
▽ More
We developed a dedicated statistical test for a massive detection of spot- and facula-crossing anomalies in multiple exoplanetary transit lightcurves, based on the frequentist $p$-value thresholding. This test was used to augment our algorithmic pipeline for transit lightcurves analysis. It was applied to $1598$ amateur and professional transit observations of $26$ targets being monitored in the EXPANSION project. We detected $109$ statistically significant candidate events revealing a roughly $2:1$ asymmetry in favor of spots-crossings over faculae-crossings. Although some candidate anomalies likely appear non-physical and originate from systematic errors, such asymmetry between negative and positive events should indicate a physical difference between the frequency of star spots and faculae. Detected spot-crossing events also reveal positive correlation between their amplitude and width, possibly owed to spot size correlation. However, the frequency of all detectable crossing events appears just about a few per cent, so they cannot explain excessive transit timing noise observed for several targets.
△ Less
Submitted 4 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
WASP-4 transit timing variation from a comprehensive set of 129 transits
Authors:
R. V. Baluev,
E. N. Sokov,
S. Hoyer,
C. Huitson,
José A. R. S. da Silva,
P. Evans,
I. A. Sokova,
C. R. Knight,
V. Sh. Shaidulin
Abstract:
We homogeneously reanalyse $124$ transit light curves for the WASP-4 b hot Jupiter. This set involved new observations secured in 2019 and nearly all observations mentioned in the literature, including high-accuracy GEMINI/GMOS transmission spectroscopy of 2011-2014 and TESS observations of 2018. The analysis confirmed a nonlinear TTV trend with $P/|\dot P|\sim (17-30)$ Myr (1-sigma range), implyi…
▽ More
We homogeneously reanalyse $124$ transit light curves for the WASP-4 b hot Jupiter. This set involved new observations secured in 2019 and nearly all observations mentioned in the literature, including high-accuracy GEMINI/GMOS transmission spectroscopy of 2011-2014 and TESS observations of 2018. The analysis confirmed a nonlinear TTV trend with $P/|\dot P|\sim (17-30)$ Myr (1-sigma range), implying only half of the initial decay rate estimation. The trend significance is at least $3.4$-sigma in the agressively conservative treatment. Possible radial acceleration due to unseen companions is not revealed in Doppler data covering seven years 2007-2014, and radial acceleration of $-15$ m s$^{-1}$yr$^{-1}$ reported in a recent preprint by another team is not confirmed. If present, it is a very nonlinear RV variation. Assuming that the entire TTV is tidal in nature, the tidal quality factor $Q_\star'\sim (4.5-8.5)\cdot 10^4$ does not reveal a convincing disagreement with available theory predictions.
△ Less
Submitted 20 April, 2020;
originally announced April 2020.
-
Homogeneously derived transit timings for 17 exoplanets and reassessed TTV trends for WASP-12 and WASP-4
Authors:
R. V. Baluev,
E. N. Sokov,
H. R. A. Jones,
V. Sh. Shaidulin,
I. A. Sokova,
L. D. Nielsen,
P. Benni,
E. M. Schneiter,
C. Villarreal D'Angelo,
E. Fernández-Lajús,
R. P. Di Sisto,
Ö. Baştürk,
M. Bretton,
A. Wunsche,
V. -P. Hentunen,
S. Shadick,
Y. Jongen,
W. Kang,
T. Kim,
E. Pakštienė,
J. K. T. Qvam,
C. R. Knight,
P. Guerra,
A. Marchini,
F. Salvaggio
, et al. (12 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We homogeneously analyse $\sim 3.2\times 10^5$ photometric measurements for $\sim 1100$ transit lightcurves belonging to $17$ exoplanet hosts. The photometric data cover $16$ years 2004--2019 and include amateur and professional observations. Old archival lightcurves were reprocessed using up-to-date exoplanetary parameters and empirically debiased limb-darkening models. We also derive self-consis…
▽ More
We homogeneously analyse $\sim 3.2\times 10^5$ photometric measurements for $\sim 1100$ transit lightcurves belonging to $17$ exoplanet hosts. The photometric data cover $16$ years 2004--2019 and include amateur and professional observations. Old archival lightcurves were reprocessed using up-to-date exoplanetary parameters and empirically debiased limb-darkening models. We also derive self-consistent transit and radial-velocity fits for $13$ targets. We confirm the nonlinear TTV trend in the WASP-12 data at a high significance, and with a consistent magnitude. However, Doppler data reveal hints of a radial acceleration about $(-7.5\pm 2.2)$~m/s/yr, indicating the presence of unseen distant companions, and suggesting that roughly $10$ per cent of the observed TTV was induced via the light-travel (or Roemer) effect. For WASP-4, a similar TTV trend suspected after the recent TESS observations appears controversial and model-dependent. It is not supported by our homogeneus TTV sample, including $10$ ground-based EXPANSION lightcurves obtained in 2018 simultaneously with TESS. Even if the TTV trend itself does exist in WASP-4, its magnitude and tidal nature are uncertain. Doppler data cannot entirely rule out the Roemer effect induced by possible distant companions.
△ Less
Submitted 13 August, 2019;
originally announced August 2019.
