-
Defining Requirements Strategies in Agile: A Design Science Research Study
Authors:
Amna Pir Muhammad,
Eric Knauss,
Odzaya Batsaikhan,
Nassiba El Haskouri,
Yi-Chun Lin,
Alessia Knauss
Abstract:
Research shows that many of the challenges currently encountered with agile development are related to requirements engineering. Based on design science research, this paper investigates critical challenges that arise in agile development from an undefined requirements strategy. We explore potential ways to address these challenges and synthesize the key building blocks of requirements strategies.…
▽ More
Research shows that many of the challenges currently encountered with agile development are related to requirements engineering. Based on design science research, this paper investigates critical challenges that arise in agile development from an undefined requirements strategy. We explore potential ways to address these challenges and synthesize the key building blocks of requirements strategies. Our design science research rests on a multiple case study with three industrial cases in the domains of communication technology, security services, and automotive. We relied on a total of 20 interviews, two workshops, participant observation in two cases, and document analysis in each of the cases to understand concrete challenges and workflows. In each case, we define a requirements strategy in collaboration with process managers and experienced engineers. From this experience, we extract guidelines for defining requirements strategies in agile development.
△ Less
Submitted 29 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
Managing Human Factors in Automated Vehicle Development: Towards Challenges and Practices
Authors:
Amna Pir Muhammad,
Eric Knauss,
Jonas Bärgman,
Alessia Knauss
Abstract:
Due to the technical complexity and social impact, automated vehicle (AV) development challenges the current state of automotive engineering practice. Research shows that it is important to consider human factors (HF) knowledge when develo** AVs to make them safe and accepted. This study explores the current practices and challenges of the automotive industries for incorporating HF requirements…
▽ More
Due to the technical complexity and social impact, automated vehicle (AV) development challenges the current state of automotive engineering practice. Research shows that it is important to consider human factors (HF) knowledge when develo** AVs to make them safe and accepted. This study explores the current practices and challenges of the automotive industries for incorporating HF requirements during agile AV development. We interviewed ten industry professionals from several Swedish automotive companies, including HF experts and AV engineers. Based on our qualitative analysis of the semi-structured interviews, a number of current approaches for communicating and incorporating HF knowledge into agile AV development and associated challenges are discussed. Our findings may help to focus future research on issues that are critical to effectively incorporate HF knowledge into agile AV development.
△ Less
Submitted 29 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
Requirements Strategy for Managing Human Factors in Automated Vehicle Development
Authors:
Amna Pir Muhammad,
Alessia Knauss,
Eric Knauss,
Jonas Bärgman
Abstract:
The integration of human factors (HF) knowledge is crucial when develo** safety-critical systems, such as automated vehicles (AVs). Ensuring that HF knowledge is considered continuously throughout the AV development process is essential for several reasons, including efficacy, safety, and acceptance of these advanced systems. However, it is challenging to include HF as requirements in agile deve…
▽ More
The integration of human factors (HF) knowledge is crucial when develo** safety-critical systems, such as automated vehicles (AVs). Ensuring that HF knowledge is considered continuously throughout the AV development process is essential for several reasons, including efficacy, safety, and acceptance of these advanced systems. However, it is challenging to include HF as requirements in agile development. Recently, Requirements Strategies have been suggested to address requirements engineering challenges in agile development. By applying the concept of Requirements Strategies as a lens to the investigation of HF requirements in agile development of AVs, this paper arrives at three areas for investigation: a) ownership and responsibility for HF requirements, b) structure of HF requirements and information models, and c) definition of work and feature flows related to HF requirements. Based on 13 semi-structured interviews with professionals from the global automotive industry, we provide qualitative insights in these three areas. The diverse perspectives and experiences shared by the interviewees provide insightful views and helped to reason about the potential solution spaces in each area for integrating HF within the industry, highlighting the real-world practices and strategies used.
△ Less
Submitted 29 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
Managing Security Evidence in Safety-Critical Organizations
Authors:
Mazen Mohamad,
Jan-Philipp Steghöfer,
Eric Knauss,
Riccardo Scandariato
Abstract:
With the increasing prevalence of open and connected products, cybersecurity has become a serious issue in safety-critical domains such as the automotive industry. As a result, regulatory bodies have become more stringent in their requirements for cybersecurity, necessitating security assurance for products developed in these domains. In response, companies have implemented new or modified process…
▽ More
With the increasing prevalence of open and connected products, cybersecurity has become a serious issue in safety-critical domains such as the automotive industry. As a result, regulatory bodies have become more stringent in their requirements for cybersecurity, necessitating security assurance for products developed in these domains. In response, companies have implemented new or modified processes to incorporate security into their product development lifecycle, resulting in a large amount of evidence being created to support claims about the achievement of a certain level of security. However, managing evidence is not a trivial task, particularly for complex products and systems. This paper presents a qualitative interview study conducted in six companies on the maturity of managing security evidence in safety-critical organizations. We find that the current maturity of managing security evidence is insufficient for the increasing requirements set by certification authorities and standardization bodies. Organisations currently fail to identify relevant artifacts as security evidence and manage this evidence on an organizational level. One part of the reason are educational gaps, the other a lack of processes. The impact of AI on the management of security evidence is still an open question
△ Less
Submitted 26 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
Automated Configuration Synthesis for Machine Learning Models: A git-Based Requirement and Architecture Management System
Authors:
Abdullatif AlShriaf,
Hans-Martin Heyn,
Eric Knauss
Abstract:
This work introduces a tool for generating runtime configurations automatically from textual requirements stored as artifacts in git repositories (a.k.a. T-Reqs) alongside the software code. The tool leverages T-Reqs-modelled architectural description to identify relevant configuration properties for the deployment of artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled software systems. This enables traceable co…
▽ More
This work introduces a tool for generating runtime configurations automatically from textual requirements stored as artifacts in git repositories (a.k.a. T-Reqs) alongside the software code. The tool leverages T-Reqs-modelled architectural description to identify relevant configuration properties for the deployment of artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled software systems. This enables traceable configuration generation, taking into account both functional and non-functional requirements. The resulting configuration specification also includes the dynamic properties that need to be adjusted and the rationale behind their adjustment. We show that this intermediary format can be directly used by the system or adapted for specific targets, for example in order to achieve runtime optimisations in term of ML model size before deployment.
△ Less
Submitted 26 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
Continuous Experimentation and Human Factors An Exploratory Study
Authors:
Amna Pir Muhammad,
Eric Knauss,
Jonas Bärgman,
Alessia Knauss
Abstract:
In todays rapidly evolving technological landscape, the success of tools and systems relies heavily on their ability to meet the needs and expectations of users. User-centered design approaches, with a focus on human factors, have gained increasing attention as they prioritize the human element in the development process. With the increasing complexity of software-based systems, companies are adop…
▽ More
In todays rapidly evolving technological landscape, the success of tools and systems relies heavily on their ability to meet the needs and expectations of users. User-centered design approaches, with a focus on human factors, have gained increasing attention as they prioritize the human element in the development process. With the increasing complexity of software-based systems, companies are adopting agile development methodologies and emphasizing continuous software experimentation. However, there is limited knowledge on how to effectively execute continuous experimentation with respect to human factors within this context. This research paper presents an exploratory qualitative study for integrating human factors in continuous experimentation, aiming to uncover distinctive characteristics of human factors and continuous software experiments, practical challenges for integrating human factors in continuous software experiments, and best practices associated with the management of continuous human factors experimentation.
△ Less
Submitted 1 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
-
VEDLIoT -- Next generation accelerated AIoT systems and applications
Authors:
Kevin Mika,
René Griessl,
Nils Kucza,
Florian Porrmann,
Martin Kaiser,
Lennart Tigges,
Jens Hagemeyer,
Pedro Trancoso,
Muhammad Waqar Azhar,
Fareed Qararyah,
Stavroula Zouzoula,
Jämes Ménétrey,
Marcelo Pasin,
Pascal Felber,
Carina Marcus,
Oliver Brunnegard,
Olof Eriksson,
Hans Salomonsson,
Daniel Ödman,
Andreas Ask,
Antonio Casimiro,
Alysson Bessani,
Tiago Carvalho,
Karol Gugala,
Piotr Zierhoffer
, et al. (7 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The VEDLIoT project aims to develop energy-efficient Deep Learning methodologies for distributed Artificial Intelligence of Things (AIoT) applications. During our project, we propose a holistic approach that focuses on optimizing algorithms while addressing safety and security challenges inherent to AIoT systems. The foundation of this approach lies in a modular and scalable cognitive IoT hardware…
▽ More
The VEDLIoT project aims to develop energy-efficient Deep Learning methodologies for distributed Artificial Intelligence of Things (AIoT) applications. During our project, we propose a holistic approach that focuses on optimizing algorithms while addressing safety and security challenges inherent to AIoT systems. The foundation of this approach lies in a modular and scalable cognitive IoT hardware platform, which leverages microserver technology to enable users to configure the hardware to meet the requirements of a diverse array of applications. Heterogeneous computing is used to boost performance and energy efficiency. In addition, the full spectrum of hardware accelerators is integrated, providing specialized ASICs as well as FPGAs for reconfigurable computing. The project's contributions span across trusted computing, remote attestation, and secure execution environments, with the ultimate goal of facilitating the design and deployment of robust and efficient AIoT systems. The overall architecture is validated on use-cases ranging from Smart Home to Automotive and Industrial IoT appliances. Ten additional use cases are integrated via an open call, broadening the range of application areas.
△ Less
Submitted 9 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
-
Automotive Perception Software Development: An Empirical Investigation into Data, Annotation, and Ecosystem Challenges
Authors:
Hans-Martin Heyn,
Khan Mohammad Habibullah,
Eric Knauss,
Jennifer Horkoff,
Markus Borg,
Alessia Knauss,
Polly **g Li
Abstract:
Software that contains machine learning algorithms is an integral part of automotive perception, for example, in driving automation systems. The development of such software, specifically the training and validation of the machine learning components, require large annotated datasets. An industry of data and annotation services has emerged to serve the development of such data-intensive automotive…
▽ More
Software that contains machine learning algorithms is an integral part of automotive perception, for example, in driving automation systems. The development of such software, specifically the training and validation of the machine learning components, require large annotated datasets. An industry of data and annotation services has emerged to serve the development of such data-intensive automotive software components. Wide-spread difficulties to specify data and annotation needs challenge collaborations between OEMs (Original Equipment Manufacturers) and their suppliers of software components, data, and annotations. This paper investigates the reasons for these difficulties for practitioners in the Swedish automotive industry to arrive at clear specifications for data and annotations. The results from an interview study show that a lack of effective metrics for data quality aspects, ambiguities in the way of working, unclear definitions of annotation quality, and deficits in the business ecosystems are causes for the difficulty in deriving the specifications. We provide a list of recommendations that can mitigate challenges when deriving specifications and we propose future research opportunities to overcome these challenges. Our work contributes towards the on-going research on accountability of machine learning as applied to complex software systems, especially for high-stake applications such as automated driving.
△ Less
Submitted 10 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
-
Requirements Engineering for Automotive Perception Systems: an Interview Study
Authors:
Khan Mohammad Habibullah,
Hans-Martin Heyn,
Gregory Gay,
Jennifer Horkoff,
Eric Knauss,
Markus Borg,
Alessia Knauss,
Håkan Sivencrona,
Polly **g Li
Abstract:
Background: Driving automation systems (DAS), including autonomous driving and advanced driver assistance, are an important safety-critical domain. DAS often incorporate perceptions systems that use machine learning (ML) to analyze the vehicle environment. Aims: We explore new or differing requirements engineering (RE) topics and challenges that practitioners experience in this domain. Method: We…
▽ More
Background: Driving automation systems (DAS), including autonomous driving and advanced driver assistance, are an important safety-critical domain. DAS often incorporate perceptions systems that use machine learning (ML) to analyze the vehicle environment. Aims: We explore new or differing requirements engineering (RE) topics and challenges that practitioners experience in this domain. Method: We have conducted an interview study with 19 participants across five companies and performed thematic analysis. Results: Practitioners have difficulty specifying upfront requirements, and often rely on scenarios and operational design domains (ODDs) as RE artifacts. Challenges relate to ODD detection and ODD exit detection, realistic scenarios, edge case specification, breaking down requirements, traceability, creating specifications for data and annotations, and quantifying quality requirements. Conclusions: Our findings contribute to understanding how RE is practiced for DAS perception systems and the collected challenges can drive future research for DAS and other ML-enabled systems.
△ Less
Submitted 23 February, 2023;
originally announced February 2023.
-
An investigation of challenges encountered when specifying training data and runtime monitors for safety critical ML applications
Authors:
Hans-Martin Heyn,
Eric Knauss,
Iswarya Malleswaran,
Shruthi Dinakaran
Abstract:
Context and motivation: The development and operation of critical software that contains machine learning (ML) models requires diligence and established processes. Especially the training data used during the development of ML models have major influences on the later behaviour of the system. Runtime monitors are used to provide guarantees for that behaviour. Question / problem: We see major uncer…
▽ More
Context and motivation: The development and operation of critical software that contains machine learning (ML) models requires diligence and established processes. Especially the training data used during the development of ML models have major influences on the later behaviour of the system. Runtime monitors are used to provide guarantees for that behaviour. Question / problem: We see major uncertainty in how to specify training data and runtime monitoring for critical ML models and by this specifying the final functionality of the system. In this interview-based study we investigate the underlying challenges for these difficulties. Principal ideas/results: Based on ten interviews with practitioners who develop ML models for critical applications in the automotive and telecommunication sector, we identified 17 underlying challenges in 6 challenge groups that relate to the challenge of specifying training data and runtime monitoring. Contribution: The article provides a list of the identified underlying challenges related to the difficulties practitioners experience when specifying training data and runtime monitoring for ML models. Furthermore, interconnection between the challenges were found and based on these connections recommendation proposed to overcome the root causes for the challenges.
△ Less
Submitted 31 January, 2023;
originally announced January 2023.
-
A Compositional Approach to Creating Architecture Frameworks with an Application to Distributed AI Systems
Authors:
Hans-Martin Heyn,
Eric Knauss,
Patrizio Pelliccione
Abstract:
Artificial intelligence (AI) in its various forms finds more and more its way into complex distributed systems. For instance, it is used locally, as part of a sensor system, on the edge for low-latency high-performance inference, or in the cloud, e.g. for data mining. Modern complex systems, such as connected vehicles, are often part of an Internet of Things (IoT). To manage complexity, architectu…
▽ More
Artificial intelligence (AI) in its various forms finds more and more its way into complex distributed systems. For instance, it is used locally, as part of a sensor system, on the edge for low-latency high-performance inference, or in the cloud, e.g. for data mining. Modern complex systems, such as connected vehicles, are often part of an Internet of Things (IoT). To manage complexity, architectures are described with architecture frameworks, which are composed of a number of architectural views connected through correspondence rules. Despite some attempts, the definition of a mathematical foundation for architecture frameworks that are suitable for the development of distributed AI systems still requires investigation and study. In this paper, we propose to extend the state of the art on architecture framework by providing a mathematical model for system architectures, which is scalable and supports co-evolution of different aspects for example of an AI system. Based on Design Science Research, this study starts by identifying the challenges with architectural frameworks. Then, we derive from the identified challenges four rules and we formulate them by exploiting concepts from category theory. We show how compositional thinking can provide rules for the creation and management of architectural frameworks for complex systems, for example distributed systems with AI. The aim of the paper is not to provide viewpoints or architecture models specific to AI systems, but instead to provide guidelines based on a mathematical formulation on how a consistent framework can be built up with existing, or newly created, viewpoints. To put in practice and test the approach, the identified and formulated rules are applied to derive an architectural framework for the EU Horizon 2020 project ``Very efficient deep learning in the IoT" (VEDLIoT) in the form of a case study.
△ Less
Submitted 27 December, 2022;
originally announced December 2022.
-
Aspects of Modelling Requirements in Very-Large Agile Systems Engineering
Authors:
Grischa Liebel,
Eric Knauss
Abstract:
Using models for requirements engineering (RE) is uncommon in systems engineering, despite the widespread use of model-based engineering in general. One reason for this lack of use is that formal models do not match well the trend to move towards agile develo** methods. While there exists work that investigates challenges in the adoption of requirements modeling and agile methods in systems engi…
▽ More
Using models for requirements engineering (RE) is uncommon in systems engineering, despite the widespread use of model-based engineering in general. One reason for this lack of use is that formal models do not match well the trend to move towards agile develo** methods. While there exists work that investigates challenges in the adoption of requirements modeling and agile methods in systems engineering, there is a lack of work studying successful approaches of using requirements modelling in agile systems engineering. To address this gap, we conducted a case study investigating the application of requirements models at Ericsson AB, a Swedish telecommunications company. We studied a department using requirements models to bridge agile development and plan-driven development aspects. We find that models are used to understand how requirements relate to each other, and to keep track with the product's evolution. To cope with the effort to maintain models over time, study participants suggest to rely on text-based notations that bring the models closer to developers and allow integration into existing software development workflows. This results in tool trade-offs, e.g., losing the possibility to control diagram layout.
△ Less
Submitted 5 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
VEDLIoT: Very Efficient Deep Learning in IoT
Authors:
Martin Kaiser,
Rene Griessl,
Nils Kucza,
Carola Haumann,
Lennart Tigges,
Kevin Mika,
Jens Hagemeyer,
Florian Porrmann,
Ulrich Rückert,
Micha vor dem Berge,
Stefan. Krupop,
Mario Porrmann,
Marco Tassemeier,
Pedro Trancoso,
Fareed Quararyah,
Stavroula Zouzoula,
Antonio Casimiro,
Alysson Bessani,
Jose Cecilio,
Stefan Andersson,
Oliver Brunnegard,
Olof Eriksson,
Roland Weiss,
Franz Meierhöfer,
Hans Salomonsson
, et al. (11 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The VEDLIoT project targets the development of energy-efficient Deep Learning for distributed AIoT applications. A holistic approach is used to optimize algorithms while also dealing with safety and security challenges. The approach is based on a modular and scalable cognitive IoT hardware platform. Using modular microserver technology enables the user to configure the hardware to satisfy a wide r…
▽ More
The VEDLIoT project targets the development of energy-efficient Deep Learning for distributed AIoT applications. A holistic approach is used to optimize algorithms while also dealing with safety and security challenges. The approach is based on a modular and scalable cognitive IoT hardware platform. Using modular microserver technology enables the user to configure the hardware to satisfy a wide range of applications. VEDLIoT offers a complete design flow for Next-Generation IoT devices required for collaboratively solving complex Deep Learning applications across distributed systems. The methods are tested on various use-cases ranging from Smart Home to Automotive and Industrial IoT appliances. VEDLIoT is an H2020 EU project which started in November 2020. It is currently in an intermediate stage with the first results available.
△ Less
Submitted 1 July, 2022;
originally announced July 2022.
-
Agile Beyond Teams and Feedback Beyond Software in Automotive Systems
Authors:
S. Magnus Ågren,
Rogardt Heldal,
Eric Knauss,
Patrizio Pelliccione
Abstract:
In order to increase the ability to build complex, software-intensive systems, as well as to decrease time-to-market for new functionality, automotive companies aim to scale agile methods beyond individual teams. This is challenging, given the specifics of automotive systems that are often safety-critical and consist of software, hardware, and mechanical components. This paper investigates the con…
▽ More
In order to increase the ability to build complex, software-intensive systems, as well as to decrease time-to-market for new functionality, automotive companies aim to scale agile methods beyond individual teams. This is challenging, given the specifics of automotive systems that are often safety-critical and consist of software, hardware, and mechanical components. This paper investigates the concrete reasons for scaling agility beyond teams, the strategies that support such scaling, and foreseeable implications that such a drastic organizational change will entail. The investigation is based on a qualitative case study, with data from 20 semi-structured interviews with managers and technical experts at two automotive companies. At the core of our findings are observations about establishing an agile vehicle-level feedback loop beyond individual teams. (I) We find that automotive OEMs aim to decrease lead-time of development. (II) We also identify 7 strategies that aim to enable scaled-agile beyond teams. (III) Finally, we extract 6 foreseeable implications and side-effects of scaling agile beyond teams in automotive. By charting the landscape of expected benefits, strategies, and implications of scaling agile beyond teams in automotive, we enable further research and process improvements.
△ Less
Submitted 24 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Setting AI in context: A case study on defining the context and operational design domain for automated driving
Authors:
Hans-Martin Heyn,
Padmini Subbiash,
Jennifer Linder,
Eric Knauss,
Olof Eriksson
Abstract:
[Context and motivation] For automated driving systems, the operational context needs to be known in order to state guarantees on performance and safety. The operational design domain (ODD) is an abstraction of the operational context, and its definition is an integral part of the system development process. [Question / problem] There are still major uncertainties in how to clearly define and doc…
▽ More
[Context and motivation] For automated driving systems, the operational context needs to be known in order to state guarantees on performance and safety. The operational design domain (ODD) is an abstraction of the operational context, and its definition is an integral part of the system development process. [Question / problem] There are still major uncertainties in how to clearly define and document the operational context in a diverse and distributed development environment such as the automotive industry. This case study investigates the challenges with context definitions for the development of perception functions that use machine learning for automated driving. [Principal ideas/results] Based on qualitative analysis of data from semi-structured interviews, the case study shows that there is a lack of standardisation for context definitions across the industry, ambiguities in the processes that lead to deriving the ODD, missing documentation of assumptions about the operational context, and a lack of involvement of function developers in the context definition. [Contribution] The results outline challenges experienced by an automotive supplier company when defining the operational context for systems using machine learning. Furthermore, the study collected ideas for potential solutions from the perspective of practitioners.
△ Less
Submitted 27 January, 2022;
originally announced January 2022.
-
What Makes Agile Software Development Agile?
Authors:
Marco Kuhrmann,
Paolo Tell,
Regina Hebig,
Jil Klünder,
Jürgen Münch,
Oliver Linssen,
Dietmar Pfahl,
Michael Felderer,
Christian R. Prause,
Stephen G. MacDonell,
Joyce Nakatumba-Nabende,
David Raffo,
Sarah Beecham,
Eray Tüzün,
Gustavo López,
Nicolas Paez,
Diego Fontdevila,
Sherlock A. Licorish,
Steffen Küpper,
Günther Ruhe,
Eric Knauss,
Özden Özcan-Top,
Paul Clarke,
Fergal McCaffery,
Marcela Genero
, et al. (22 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Together with many success stories, promises such as the increase in production speed and the improvement in stakeholders' collaboration have contributed to making agile a transformation in the software industry in which many companies want to take part. However, driven either by a natural and expected evolution or by contextual factors that challenge the adoption of agile methods as prescribed by…
▽ More
Together with many success stories, promises such as the increase in production speed and the improvement in stakeholders' collaboration have contributed to making agile a transformation in the software industry in which many companies want to take part. However, driven either by a natural and expected evolution or by contextual factors that challenge the adoption of agile methods as prescribed by their creator(s), software processes in practice mutate into hybrids over time. Are these still agile? In this article, we investigate the question: what makes a software development method agile? We present an empirical study grounded in a large-scale international survey that aims to identify software development methods and practices that improve or tame agility. Based on 556 data points, we analyze the perceived degree of agility in the implementation of standard project disciplines and its relation to used development methods and practices. Our findings suggest that only a small number of participants operate their projects in a purely traditional or agile manner (under 15%). That said, most project disciplines and most practices show a clear trend towards increasing degrees of agility. Compared to the methods used to develop software, the selection of practices has a stronger effect on the degree of agility of a given discipline. Finally, there are no methods or practices that explicitly guarantee or prevent agility. We conclude that agility cannot be defined solely at the process level. Additional factors need to be taken into account when trying to implement or improve agility in a software company. Finally, we discuss the field of software process-related research in the light of our findings and present a roadmap for future research.
△ Less
Submitted 23 September, 2021;
originally announced September 2021.
-
Agile Islands in a Waterfall Environment: Requirements Engineering Challenges and Strategies in Automotive
Authors:
Rashidah Kasauli,
Eric Knauss,
Joyce Nakatumba-Nabende,
Benjamin Kanagwa
Abstract:
[Context & motivation] Driven by the need for faster time-to-market and reduced development lead-time, large-scale systems engineering companies are adopting agile methods in their organizations. This agile transformation is challenging and it is common that adoption starts bottom-up with agile software teams within the context of traditional company structures.
[Question/Problem] This creates t…
▽ More
[Context & motivation] Driven by the need for faster time-to-market and reduced development lead-time, large-scale systems engineering companies are adopting agile methods in their organizations. This agile transformation is challenging and it is common that adoption starts bottom-up with agile software teams within the context of traditional company structures.
[Question/Problem] This creates the challenge of agile teams working within a document-centric and plan-driven (or waterfall) environment. While it may be desirable to take the best of both worlds, it is not clear how that can be achieved especially with respect to managing requirements in large-scale systems.
[Principal ideas/Results] This paper presents an exploratory case study at an automotive company, focusing on two departments of a large-scale systems company that is in the process of company-wide agile adoption.
[Contribution] We present challenges related to requirements engineering that agile teams face while working within a larger plan-driven context and propose potential strategies to mitigate the challenges. Challenges relate to, e.g., development teams not being aware of the high-level requirement and dealing with flexibility of writing user stories. We found that strategies for overcoming most of these challenges are still lacking and thus call for more research.
△ Less
Submitted 21 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
-
Managing Traceability Information Models: Not such a simple task after all?
Authors:
Salome Maro,
Jan-Philipp Steghöfer,
Eric Knauss,
Jennifer Horkoff,
Rashidah Kasauli,
Rebekka Wohlrab,
Jesper Lysemose Korsgaard,
Florian Wartenberg,
Niels Jørgen Strøm,
Ruben Alexandersson
Abstract:
Practitioners are poorly supported by the scientific literature when managing traceability information models (TIMs), which capture the structure and semantics of trace links. In practice, companies manage their TIMs in very different ways, even in cases where companies share many similarities. We present our findings from an in-depth focus group about TIM management with three different systems e…
▽ More
Practitioners are poorly supported by the scientific literature when managing traceability information models (TIMs), which capture the structure and semantics of trace links. In practice, companies manage their TIMs in very different ways, even in cases where companies share many similarities. We present our findings from an in-depth focus group about TIM management with three different systems engineering companies. We find that the concrete needs of the companies as well as challenges such as scale and workflow integration are not considered by existing scientific work. We thus issue a call-to-arms for the requirements engineering and software and systems traceability communities, the two main communities for traceability research, to refocus their work on these practical problems.
△ Less
Submitted 9 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
-
FLOW Map**: Planning and Managing Communication in Distributed Teams
Authors:
Kai Stapel,
Eric Knauss,
Kurt Schneider,
Nico Zazworka
Abstract:
Distributed software development is more difficult than co-located software development. One of the main reasons is that communication is more difficult in distributed settings. Defined processes and artifacts help, but cannot cover all information needs. Not communicating important project information, decisions and rationales can result in duplicate or extra work, delays or even project failure.…
▽ More
Distributed software development is more difficult than co-located software development. One of the main reasons is that communication is more difficult in distributed settings. Defined processes and artifacts help, but cannot cover all information needs. Not communicating important project information, decisions and rationales can result in duplicate or extra work, delays or even project failure. Planning and managing a distributed project from an information flow perspective helps to facilitate available communication channels right from the start - beyond the documents and artifacts which are defined for a given development process. In this paper we propose FLOW Map**, a systematic approach for planning and managing information flows in distributed projects. We demonstrate the feasibility of our approach with a case study in a distributed agile class room project. FLOW Map** is sufficient to plan communication and to measure conformance to the communication strategy. We also discuss cost and impact of our approach.
△ Less
Submitted 9 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
-
Requirement Engineering Challenges for AI-intense Systems Development
Authors:
Hans-Martin Heyn,
Eric Knauss,
Amna Pir Muhammad,
Olof Eriksson,
Jennifer Linder,
Padmini Subbiah,
Shameer Kumar Pradhan,
Sagar Tungal
Abstract:
Availability of powerful computation and communication technology as well as advances in artificial intelligence enable a new generation of complex, AI-intense systems and applications. Such systems and applications promise exciting improvements on a societal level, yet they also bring with them new challenges for their development. In this paper we argue that significant challenges relate to defi…
▽ More
Availability of powerful computation and communication technology as well as advances in artificial intelligence enable a new generation of complex, AI-intense systems and applications. Such systems and applications promise exciting improvements on a societal level, yet they also bring with them new challenges for their development. In this paper we argue that significant challenges relate to defining and ensuring behaviour and quality attributes of such systems and applications. We specifically derive four challenge areas from relevant use cases of complex, AI-intense systems and applications related to industry, transportation, and home automation: understanding, determining, and specifying (i) contextual definitions and requirements, (ii) data attributes and requirements, (iii) performance definition and monitoring, and (iv) the impact of human factors on system acceptance and success. Solving these challenges will imply process support that integrates new requirements engineering methods into development approaches for complex, AI-intense systems and applications. We present these challenges in detail and propose a research roadmap.
△ Less
Submitted 22 March, 2021; v1 submitted 18 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
-
Constructive Master's Thesis Work in Industry: Guidelines for Applying Design Science Research
Authors:
Eric Knauss
Abstract:
Context: Software engineering researchers and practitioners rely on empirical evidence from the field. Thus, education of software engineers must include strong and applied education in empirical research methods. For most students, the master's thesis is the last, but also most applied form of this education in their studies.
Problem: Especially thesis work in collaboration with industry requir…
▽ More
Context: Software engineering researchers and practitioners rely on empirical evidence from the field. Thus, education of software engineers must include strong and applied education in empirical research methods. For most students, the master's thesis is the last, but also most applied form of this education in their studies.
Problem: Especially thesis work in collaboration with industry requires that concerns of stakeholders from academia and practice are carefully balanced. It is possible, yet difficult to do high-impact empirical work within the timeframe of a typical thesis. In particular, if this research aims to provide practical value to industry, academic quality can suffer. Even though constructive research methods such as Design Science Research (DSR) exist, thesis projects repeatably struggle to apply them.
Principle solution idea: DSR enables balancing such concerns by providing room both for knowledge questions and design work. Yet, only limited experience exists in our field on how to make this research method work within the context of a master's thesis. To enable running design science master's theses in collaboration with industry, we complement existing method descriptions and guidelines with our own experience and pragmatic advice to students, examiners, and supervisors in academia and industry.
Method: This paper itself is based on DSR. Based on 12 design science theses over the last seven years, we collect common pitfalls and good practice from analysing the theses, the student-supervisor interaction, the supervisor-industry interaction, the examiner feedback, and, where available, reviewer comments on publications that are based on such theses.
Results: We provide concrete advise for framing research questions, structuring a report, as well as for planning and conducting empirical work with practitioners.
△ Less
Submitted 13 February, 2021; v1 submitted 9 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
-
How do Practitioners Perceive the Relevance of Requirements Engineering Research?
Authors:
Xavier Franch,
Daniel Mendez,
Andreas Vogelsang,
Rogardt Heldal,
Eric Knauss,
Marc Oriol,
Guilherme H. Travassos,
Jeffrey C. Carver,
Thomas Zimmermann
Abstract:
The relevance of Requirements Engineering (RE) research to practitioners is vital for a long-term dissemination of research results to everyday practice. Some authors have speculated about a mismatch between research and practice in the RE discipline. However, there is not much evidence to support or refute this perception. This paper presents the results of a study aimed at gathering evidence fro…
▽ More
The relevance of Requirements Engineering (RE) research to practitioners is vital for a long-term dissemination of research results to everyday practice. Some authors have speculated about a mismatch between research and practice in the RE discipline. However, there is not much evidence to support or refute this perception. This paper presents the results of a study aimed at gathering evidence from practitioners about their perception of the relevance of RE research and at understanding the factors that influence that perception. We conducted a questionnaire-based survey of industry practitioners with expertise in RE. The participants rated the perceived relevance of 435 scientific papers presented at five top RE-related conferences. The 153 participants provided a total of 2,164 ratings. The practitioners rated RE research as essential or worthwhile in a majority of cases. However, the percentage of non-positive ratings is still higher than we would like. Among the factors that affect the perception of relevance are the research's links to industry, the research method used, and respondents' roles. The reasons for positive perceptions were primarily related to the relevance of the problem and the soundness of the solution, while the causes for negative perceptions were more varied. The respondents also provided suggestions for future research, including topics researchers have studied for decades, like elicitation or requirement quality criteria.
△ Less
Submitted 3 December, 2020; v1 submitted 10 November, 2020;
originally announced November 2020.
-
Modeling and Analysis of Boundary Objects and Methodological Islands in Large-Scale Systems Development
Authors:
Rebekka Wohlrab,
Jennifer Horkoff,
Rashidah Kasauli,
Salome Maro,
Jan-Philipp Steghöfer,
Eric Knauss
Abstract:
Large-scale companies commonly face the challenge of managing relevant knowledge between different organizational groups, particularly in increasingly agile contexts. In previous studies, we found the importance of analyzing methodological islands (i.e., groups using different development methods than the surrounding organization) and boundary objects between them. In this paper, we propose a meta…
▽ More
Large-scale companies commonly face the challenge of managing relevant knowledge between different organizational groups, particularly in increasingly agile contexts. In previous studies, we found the importance of analyzing methodological islands (i.e., groups using different development methods than the surrounding organization) and boundary objects between them. In this paper, we propose a metamodel to better capture and analyze coordination and knowledge management in practice. Such a metamodel can allow practitioners to describe current practices, analyze issues, and design better-suited coordination mechanisms. We evaluated the conceptual model together with four large-scale companies develo** complex systems. In particular, we derived an initial list of bad smells that can be leveraged to detect issues and devise suitable improvement strategies for inter-team coordination in large-scale development. We present the model, smells, and our evaluation results.
△ Less
Submitted 19 August, 2020; v1 submitted 18 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
-
Why and How Your Traceability Should Evolve: Insights from an Automotive Supplier
Authors:
Rebekka Wohlrab,
Patrizio Pelliccione,
Ali Shahrokni,
Eric Knauss
Abstract:
Traceability is a key enabler of various activities in automotive software and systems engineering and required by several standards. However, most existing traceability management approaches do not consider that traceability is situated in constantly changing development contexts involving multiple stakeholders. Together with an automotive supplier, we analyzed how technology, business, and organ…
▽ More
Traceability is a key enabler of various activities in automotive software and systems engineering and required by several standards. However, most existing traceability management approaches do not consider that traceability is situated in constantly changing development contexts involving multiple stakeholders. Together with an automotive supplier, we analyzed how technology, business, and organizational factors raise the need for flexible traceability. We present how traceability can be evolved in the development lifecycle, from early elicitation of traceability needs to the implementation of mature traceability strategies. Moreover, we shed light on how traceability can be managed flexibly within an agile team and more formally when crossing team borders and organizational borders. Based on these insights, we present requirements for flexible tool solutions, supporting varying levels of data quality, change propagation, versioning, and organizational traceability.
△ Less
Submitted 19 May, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
-
Charting Coordination Needs in Large-Scale Agile Organisationswith Boundary Objects and Methodological Islands
Authors:
Rashidah Kasauli,
Rebekka Wohlrab,
Eric Knauss,
Jan-Philipp Steghöfer,
Jennifer Horkoff,
Salome Maro
Abstract:
Large-scale system development companies are increasingly adopting agile methods. While this adoption may improve lead-times, such companies need to balance two trade-offs: (i) the need to have a uniform, consistent development method on system level with the need for specialised methods for teams in different disciplines(e.g., hardware, software, mechanics, sales, support); (ii) the need for comp…
▽ More
Large-scale system development companies are increasingly adopting agile methods. While this adoption may improve lead-times, such companies need to balance two trade-offs: (i) the need to have a uniform, consistent development method on system level with the need for specialised methods for teams in different disciplines(e.g., hardware, software, mechanics, sales, support); (ii) the need for comprehensive documentation on system level with the need to have lightweight documentation enabling iterative and agile work. With specialised methods for teams, isolated teams work within larger ecosystems of plan-driven culture, i.e., teams become agile "islands". At the boundaries, these teams share knowledge which needs to be managed well for a correct system to be developed. While it is useful to support diverse and specialised methods, it is important to understand which islands are repeatedly encountered, the reasons or factors triggering their existence, and how best to handle coordination between them. Based on a multiple case study, this work presents a catalogue of islands and the boundary objects between them. We believe this work will be beneficial to practitioners aiming to understand their ecosystems and researchers addressing communication and coordination challenges in large-scale development.
△ Less
Submitted 12 May, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
-
Why and How to Balance Alignment and Diversity of Requirements Engineering Practices in Automotive
Authors:
Rebekka Wohlrab,
Eric Knauss,
Patrizio Pelliccione
Abstract:
In large-scale automotive companies, various requirements engineering (RE) practices are used across teams. RE practices manifest in Requirements Information Models (RIM) that define what concepts and information should be captured for requirements. Collaboration of practitioners from different parts of an organization is required to define a suitable RIM that balances support for diverse practice…
▽ More
In large-scale automotive companies, various requirements engineering (RE) practices are used across teams. RE practices manifest in Requirements Information Models (RIM) that define what concepts and information should be captured for requirements. Collaboration of practitioners from different parts of an organization is required to define a suitable RIM that balances support for diverse practices in individual teams with the alignment needed for a shared view and team support on system level. There exists no guidance for this challenging task. This paper presents a mixed methods study to examine the role of RIMs in balancing alignment and diversity of RE practices in four automotive companies. Our analysis is based on data from systems engineering tools, 11 semi-structured interviews, and a survey to validate findings and suggestions. We found that balancing alignment and diversity of RE practices is important to consider when defining RIMs. We further investigated enablers for this balance and actions that practitioners take to achieve it. From these factors, we derived and evaluated recommendations for managing RIMs in practice that take into account the lifecycle of requirements and allow for diverse practices across sub-disciplines in early development, while enforcing alignment of requirements that are close to release.
△ Less
Submitted 6 January, 2020;
originally announced January 2020.
-
Challenges of Scaled Agile for Safety-Critical Systems
Authors:
Jan-Philipp Steghöfer,
Eric Knauss,
Jennifer Horkoff,
Rebekka Wohlrab
Abstract:
Automotive companies increasingly adopt scaled agile methods to allow them to deal with their organisational and product complexity. Suitable methods are needed to ensure safety when develo** automotive systems. On a small scale, R-Scrum and SafeScrum are two concrete suggestions for how to develop safety-critical systems using agile methods. However, for large-scale environments, existing frame…
▽ More
Automotive companies increasingly adopt scaled agile methods to allow them to deal with their organisational and product complexity. Suitable methods are needed to ensure safety when develo** automotive systems. On a small scale, R-Scrum and SafeScrum are two concrete suggestions for how to develop safety-critical systems using agile methods. However, for large-scale environments, existing frameworks like SAFe or LeSS do not support the development of safety-critical systems out of the box. We, therefore, aim to understand which challenges exist when develo** safety-critical systems within large-scale agile industrial settings, in particular in the automotive domain. Based on an analysis of R-Scrum and SafeScrum, we conducted a focus group with three experts from industry to collect challenges in their daily work. We found challenges in the areas of living traceability, continuous compliance, and organisational flexibility. Among others, organisations struggle with defining a suitable traceability strategy, performing incremental safety analysis, and with integrating safety practices into their scaled way of working. Our results indicate a need to provide practical approaches to integrate safety work into large-scale agile development and point towards possible solutions, e.g., modular safety cases.
Keywords: Scaled Agile, Safety-Critical Systems, Software Processes, R-Scrum, SafeScrum
△ Less
Submitted 28 November, 2019;
originally announced November 2019.
-
Strategic API Analysis and Planning: APIS Technical Report
Authors:
Jennifer Horkoff,
Juho Lindman,
Imed Hammouda,
Eric Knauss
Abstract:
Traditionally, software APIs (application programming interfaces) have been viewed from a technical perspective, as a means to separate implementation from functional calls, and as a way to define a contract of software functionality. The technical benefits of APIs have been reported in numerous studies. Several reports from industry offer useful practical design considerations for APIs, including…
▽ More
Traditionally, software APIs (application programming interfaces) have been viewed from a technical perspective, as a means to separate implementation from functional calls, and as a way to define a contract of software functionality. The technical benefits of APIs have been reported in numerous studies. Several reports from industry offer useful practical design considerations for APIs, including advice on collecting usage data, monetization strategies, and at what point to open an API to external parties. Although this advice can be useful, the focus is still often on the API, only without considering the role the API plays in the wider organization or how it fits into an organizational strategy. Our industrial experiences show that more information is needed about the challenges and best practices of API design and management in an organizational context. Furthermore, it has become apparent that APIs are able to play a key role as part of a strategic business plan for software-intensive companies. In this report, we present the results of our work with companies to build a framework that synthesizes and summarizes API strategies from several perspectives, including: strategic API lifecycle, lifecycle stage characteristics, lifecycle use cases and transition points, API layered architecture, BAPO, value modeling, ecosystem map** with goal models, API metrics, goal models with metrics, and API governance guidance. Our research was carried out with an industry-academic collaboration. The framework was developed iteratively through workshops and discussions with company partners. We show how conceptual frameworks can be used to drive API strategy development, drawing on our research with several companies in practice.
△ Less
Submitted 1 November, 2019;
originally announced November 2019.
-
Boundary Objects and their Use in Agile Systems Engineering
Authors:
Rebekka Wohlrab,
Patrizio Pelliccione,
Eric Knauss,
Mats Larsson
Abstract:
Agile methods are increasingly introduced in automotive companies in the attempt to become more efficient and flexible in the system development. The adoption of agile practices influences communication between stakeholders, but also makes companies rethink the management of artifacts and documentation like requirements, safety compliance documents, and architecture models. Practitioners aim to re…
▽ More
Agile methods are increasingly introduced in automotive companies in the attempt to become more efficient and flexible in the system development. The adoption of agile practices influences communication between stakeholders, but also makes companies rethink the management of artifacts and documentation like requirements, safety compliance documents, and architecture models. Practitioners aim to reduce irrelevant documentation, but face a lack of guidance to determine what artifacts are needed and how they should be managed. This paper presents artifacts, challenges, guidelines, and practices for the continuous management of systems engineering artifacts in automotive based on a theoretical and empirical understanding of the topic. In collaboration with 53 practitioners from six automotive companies, we conducted a design-science study involving interviews, a questionnaire, focus groups, and practical data analysis of a systems engineering tool. The guidelines suggest the distinction between artifacts that are shared among different actors in a company (boundary objects) and those that are used within a team (locally relevant artifacts). We propose an analysis approach to identify boundary objects and three practices to manage systems engineering artifacts in industry.
△ Less
Submitted 27 April, 2019;
originally announced April 2019.
-
Safety-Critical Systems and Agile Development: A Map** Study
Authors:
Rashidah Kasauli,
Eric Knauss,
Benjamin Kanagwa,
Agneta Nilsson,
Gul Calikli
Abstract:
In the last decades, agile methods had a huge impact on how software is developed. In many cases, this has led to significant benefits, such as quality and speed of software deliveries to customers. However, safety-critical systems have widely been dismissed from benefiting from agile methods. Products that include safety critical aspects are therefore faced with a situation in which the developme…
▽ More
In the last decades, agile methods had a huge impact on how software is developed. In many cases, this has led to significant benefits, such as quality and speed of software deliveries to customers. However, safety-critical systems have widely been dismissed from benefiting from agile methods. Products that include safety critical aspects are therefore faced with a situation in which the development of safety-critical parts can significantly limit the potential speed-up through agile methods, for the full product, but also in the non-safety critical parts. For such products, the ability to develop safety-critical software in an agile way will generate a competitive advantage. In order to enable future research in this important area, we present in this paper a map** of the current state of practice based on {a mixed method approach}. Starting from a workshop with experts from six large Swedish product development companies we develop a lens for our analysis. We then present a systematic map** study on safety-critical systems and agile development through this lens in order to map potential benefits, challenges, and solution candidates for guiding future research.
△ Less
Submitted 3 August, 2018; v1 submitted 20 July, 2018;
originally announced July 2018.
-
T-Reqs: Tool Support for Managing Requirements in Large-Scale Agile System Development
Authors:
Eric Knauss,
Grischa Liebel,
Jennifer Horkoff,
Rebekka Wohlrab,
Rashidah Kasauli,
Filip Lange,
Pierre Gildert
Abstract:
T-Reqs is a text-based requirements management solution based on the git version control system. It combines useful conventions, templates and helper scripts with powerful existing solutions from the git ecosystem and provides a working solution to address some known requirements engineering challenges in large-scale agile system development. Specifically, it allows agile cross-functional teams to…
▽ More
T-Reqs is a text-based requirements management solution based on the git version control system. It combines useful conventions, templates and helper scripts with powerful existing solutions from the git ecosystem and provides a working solution to address some known requirements engineering challenges in large-scale agile system development. Specifically, it allows agile cross-functional teams to be aware of requirements at system level and enables them to efficiently propose updates to those requirements. Based on our experience with T-Reqs, we i) relate known requirements challenges of large-scale agile system development to tool support; ii) list key requirements for tooling in such a context; and iii) propose concrete solutions for challenges.
△ Less
Submitted 20 July, 2018; v1 submitted 7 May, 2018;
originally announced May 2018.
-
Involving External Stakeholders in Project Courses
Authors:
Jan-Philipp Steghöfer,
Håkan Burden,
Regina Hebig,
Gul Calikli,
Robert Feldt,
Imed Hammouda,
Jennifer Horkoff,
Eric Knauss,
Grischa Liebel
Abstract:
Problem: The involvement of external stakeholders in capstone projects and project courses is desirable due to its potential positive effects on the students. Capstone projects particularly profit from the inclusion of an industrial partner to make the project relevant and help students acquire professional skills. In addition, an increasing push towards education that is aligned with industry and…
▽ More
Problem: The involvement of external stakeholders in capstone projects and project courses is desirable due to its potential positive effects on the students. Capstone projects particularly profit from the inclusion of an industrial partner to make the project relevant and help students acquire professional skills. In addition, an increasing push towards education that is aligned with industry and incorporates industrial partners can be observed. However, the involvement of external stakeholders in teaching moments can create friction and could, in the worst case, lead to frustration of all involved parties. Contribution: We developed a model that allows analysing the involvement of external stakeholders in university courses both in a retrospective fashion, to gain insights from past course instances, and in a constructive fashion, to plan the involvement of external stakeholders. Key Concepts: The conceptual model and the accompanying guideline guide the teachers in their analysis of stakeholder involvement. The model is comprised of several activities (define, execute, and evaluate the collaboration). The guideline provides questions that the teachers should answer for each of these activities. In the constructive use, the model allows teachers to define an action plan based on an analysis of potential stakeholders and the pedagogical objectives. In the retrospective use, the model allows teachers to identify issues that appeared during the project and their underlying causes. Drawing from ideas of the reflective practitioner, the model contains an emphasis on reflection and interpretation of the observations made by the teacher and other groups involved in the courses. Key Lessons: Applying the model retrospectively to a total of eight courses shows that it is possible to reveal hitherto implicit risks and assumptions and to gain a better insight into the interaction...
△ Less
Submitted 4 May, 2018; v1 submitted 3 May, 2018;
originally announced May 2018.
-
How do Practitioners Perceive the Relevance of Requirements Engineering Research? An Ongoing Study
Authors:
X. Franch,
D. Méndez Fernández,
M. Oriol,
A. Vogelsang,
R. Heldal,
E. Knauss,
G. Horta Travassos,
J. C. Carver,
O. Dieste,
T. Zimmermann
Abstract:
The relevance of Requirements Engineering (RE) research to practitioners is a prerequisite for problem-driven research in the area and key for a long-term dissemination of research results to everyday practice. To better understand how industry practitioners perceive the practical relevance of RE research, we have initiated the RE-Pract project, an international collaboration conducting an empiric…
▽ More
The relevance of Requirements Engineering (RE) research to practitioners is a prerequisite for problem-driven research in the area and key for a long-term dissemination of research results to everyday practice. To better understand how industry practitioners perceive the practical relevance of RE research, we have initiated the RE-Pract project, an international collaboration conducting an empirical study. This project opts for a replication of previous work done in two different domains and relies on survey research. To this end, we have designed a survey to be sent to several hundred industry practitioners at various companies around the world and ask them to rate their perceived practical relevance of the research described in a sample of 418 RE papers published between 2010 and 2015 at the RE, ICSE, FSE, ESEC/FSE, ESEM and REFSQ conferences. In this paper, we summarise our research protocol and present the current status of our study and the planned future steps.
△ Less
Submitted 14 June, 2017; v1 submitted 17 May, 2017;
originally announced May 2017.
-
Orchestration of Global Software Engineering Projects
Authors:
Christian Bartelt,
Manfred Broy,
Christoph Herrmann,
Eric Knauss,
Marco Kuhrmann,
Andreas Rausch,
Bernhard Rumpe,
Kurt Schneider
Abstract:
Global software engineering has become a fact in many companies due to real necessity in practice. In contrast to co-located projects global projects face a number of additional software engineering challenges. Among them quality management has become much more difficult and schedule and budget overruns can be observed more often. Compared to co-located projects global software engineering is even…
▽ More
Global software engineering has become a fact in many companies due to real necessity in practice. In contrast to co-located projects global projects face a number of additional software engineering challenges. Among them quality management has become much more difficult and schedule and budget overruns can be observed more often. Compared to co-located projects global software engineering is even more challenging due to the need for integration of different cultures, different languages, and different time zones - across companies, and across countries. The diversity of development locations on several levels seriously endangers an effective and goal-oriented progress of projects. In this position paper we discuss reasons for global development, sketch settings for distribution and views of orchestration of dislocated companies in a global project that can be seen as a "virtual project environment". We also present a collection of questions, which we consider relevant for global software engineering. The questions motivate further discussion to derive a research agenda in global software engineering.
△ Less
Submitted 22 September, 2014;
originally announced September 2014.
-
Supporting acceptance testing in distributed software projects with integrated feedback systems: Experiences and requirements
Authors:
Olga Liskin,
Christoph Herrmann,
Eric Knauss,
Thomas Kurpick,
Bernhard Rumpe,
Kurt Schneider
Abstract:
During acceptance testing customers assess whether a system meets their expectations and often identify issues that should be improved. These findings have to be communicated to the developers a task we observed to be error prone, especially in distributed teams. Here, it is normally not possible to have developer representatives from every site attend the test. Developers who were not present mig…
▽ More
During acceptance testing customers assess whether a system meets their expectations and often identify issues that should be improved. These findings have to be communicated to the developers a task we observed to be error prone, especially in distributed teams. Here, it is normally not possible to have developer representatives from every site attend the test. Developers who were not present might misunderstand insufficiently documented findings. This hinders fixing the issues and endangers customer satisfaction. Integrated feedback systems promise to mitigate this problem. They allow to easily capture findings and their context. Correctly applied, this technique could improve feedback, while reducing customer effort. This paper collects our experiences from comparing acceptance testing with and without feedback systems in a distributed project. Our results indicate that this technique can improve acceptance testing if certain requirements are met. We identify key requirements feedback systems should meet to support acceptance testing.
△ Less
Submitted 1 September, 2014;
originally announced September 2014.
