Showing 1–5 of 5 results for author: Klingler, N J

Swift/UVOT discovery of Swift J221951-484240: a UV luminous ambiguous nuclear transient

Authors: S. R. Oates, N. P. M. Kuin, M. Nicholl, F. Marshall, E. Ridley, K. Boutsia, A. A. Breeveld, D. A. H. Buckley, S. B. Cenko, M. De Pasquale, P. G. Edwards, M. Gromadzki, R. Gupta, S. Laha, N. Morrell, M. Orio, S. B. Pandey, M. J. Page, K. L. Page, T. Parsotan, A. Rau, P. Schady, J. Stevens, P. J. Brown, P. A. Evans , et al. (35 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: We report the discovery of Swift J221951-484240 (hereafter: J221951), a luminous slow-evolving blue transient that was detected by the Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory Ultra-violet/Optical Telescope (Swift/UVOT) during the follow-up of Gravitational Wave alert S190930t, to which it is unrelated. Swift/UVOT photometry shows the UV spectral energy distribution of the transient to be well modelled by a… ▽ More We report the discovery of Swift J221951-484240 (hereafter: J221951), a luminous slow-evolving blue transient that was detected by the Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory Ultra-violet/Optical Telescope (Swift/UVOT) during the follow-up of Gravitational Wave alert S190930t, to which it is unrelated. Swift/UVOT photometry shows the UV spectral energy distribution of the transient to be well modelled by a slowly shrinking black body with an approximately constant temperature of T~2.5x10^4 K. At a redshift z=0.5205, J221951 had a peak absolute magnitude of M_u,AB = -23 mag, peak bolometric luminosity L_max=1.1x10^45 erg s^-1 and a total radiated energy of E>2.6x10^52 erg. The archival WISE IR photometry shows a slow rise prior to a peak near the discovery date. Spectroscopic UV observations display broad absorption lines in N V and O VI, pointing toward an outflow at coronal temperatures. The lack of emission in the higher H~Lyman lines, N I and other neutral lines is consistent with a viewing angle close to the plane of the accretion or debris disc. The origin of J221951 can not be determined with certainty but has properties consistent with a tidal disruption event and the turn-on of an active galactic nucleus. △ Less

Submitted 3 July, 2023; originally announced July 2023.

Comments: 37 pages (25 main + 12 supplementary), submitted to MNRAS

Swift/UVOT follow-up of Gravitational Wave Alerts in the O3 era

Authors: S. R. Oates, F. E. Marshall, A. A. Breeveld, N. P. M. Kuin, P. J. Brown, M. De Pasquale, P. A. Evans, A. J. Fenney, C. Gronwall, J. A. Kennea, N. J. Klingler, M. J. Page, M. H. Siegel, A. Tohuvavohu, E. Ambrosi, S. D. Barthelmy, A. P. Beardmore, M. G. Bernardini, S. Campana, R. Caputo, S. B. Cenko, G. Cusumano, A. D'Aì, P. D'Avanzo, V. D'Elia , et al. (19 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: In this paper, we report on the observational performance of the Swift Ultra-violet/Optical Telescope (UVOT) in response to the Gravitational Wave alerts announced by the Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory and the Advanced Virgo detector during the O3 period. We provide the observational strategy for follow-up of GW alerts and provide an overview of the processing and ana… ▽ More In this paper, we report on the observational performance of the Swift Ultra-violet/Optical Telescope (UVOT) in response to the Gravitational Wave alerts announced by the Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory and the Advanced Virgo detector during the O3 period. We provide the observational strategy for follow-up of GW alerts and provide an overview of the processing and analysis of candidate optical/UV sources. For the O3 period, we also provide a statistical overview and report on serendipitous sources discovered by Swift/UVOT. Swift followed 18 gravitational-wave candidate alerts, with UVOT observing a total of 424 deg^2. We found 27 sources that changed in magnitude at the 3 sigma level compared with archival u or g-band catalogued values. Swift/UVOT also followed up a further 13 sources reported by other facilities during the O3 period. Using catalogue information, we divided these 40 sources into five initial classifications: 11 candidate active galactic nuclei (AGN)/quasars, 3 Cataclysmic Variables (CVs), 9 supernovae, 11 unidentified sources that had archival photometry and 6 uncatalogued sources for which no archival photometry was available. We have no strong evidence to identify any of these transients as counterparts to the GW events. The 17 unclassified sources are likely a mix of AGN and a class of fast-evolving transient, and one source may be a CV. △ Less

Submitted 26 July, 2021; originally announced July 2021.

Comments: 25 pages, 6 figures and 5 tables. Submitted to MNRAS. Supplementary contains 23 pages with 8 figures and 1 table

Swift Multiwavelength Follow-up of LVC S200224ca and the Implications for Binary Black Hole Mergers

Authors: N. J. Klingler, A. Lien, S. R. Oates, J. A. Kennea, P. A. Evans, A. Tohuvavohu, B. Zhang, K. L. Page, S. B. Cenko, S. D. Barthelmy, A. P. Beardmore, M. G. Bernardini, A. A. Breeveld, P. J. Brown, D. N. Burrows, S. Campana, G. Cusumano, A. D'Aì, P. D'Avanzo, V. D'Elia, M. de Pasquale, S. W. K. Emery, J. Garcia, P. Giommi, C. Gronwall , et al. (19 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: On 2020 February 24, during their third observing run ("O3"), the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory and Virgo Collaboration (LVC) detected S200224ca: a candidate gravitational wave (GW) event produced by a binary black hole (BBH) merger. This event was one of the best-localized compact binary coalescences detected in O3 (with 50%/90% error regions of 13/72 deg$^2$), and so the Ne… ▽ More On 2020 February 24, during their third observing run ("O3"), the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory and Virgo Collaboration (LVC) detected S200224ca: a candidate gravitational wave (GW) event produced by a binary black hole (BBH) merger. This event was one of the best-localized compact binary coalescences detected in O3 (with 50%/90% error regions of 13/72 deg$^2$), and so the Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory performed rapid near-UV/X-ray follow-up observations. Swift-XRT and UVOT covered approximately 79.2% and 62.4% (respectively) of the GW error region, making S200224ca the BBH event most thoroughly followed-up in near-UV (u-band) and X-ray to date. No likely EM counterparts to the GW event were found by the Swift BAT, XRT, or UVOT, nor by other observatories. Here we report on the results of our searches for an EM counterpart, both in the BAT data near the time of the merger, and in follow-up UVOT/XRT observations. We also discuss the upper limits we can place on EM radiation from S200224ca, and the implications these limits have on the physics of BBH mergers. Namely, we place a shallow upper limit on the dimensionless BH charge, $\hat{q} < 1.4 \times10^{-4}$, and an upper limit on the isotropic-equivalent energy of a blast wave $E < 4.1\times10^{51}$ erg (assuming typical GRB parameters). △ Less

Submitted 11 December, 2020; v1 submitted 9 December, 2020; originally announced December 2020.

Comments: 14 pages, 6 figures, accepted for publication in ApJ

Swift-XRT follow-up of gravitational wave triggers during the third aLIGO/Virgo observing run

Authors: K. L. Page, P. A. Evans, A. Tohuvavohu, J. A. Kennea, N. J. Klingler, S. B. Cenko, S. R. Oates, E. Ambrosi, S. D. Barthelmy, A. P. Beardmore, M. G. Bernardini, A. A. Breeveld, P. J. Brown, D. N. Burrows, S. Campana, R. Caputo, G. Cusumano, A. D'Ai, P. D'Avanzo, V. D'Elia, M. De Pasquale, S. W. K. Emery, P. Giommi, C. Gronwall, D. H. Hartmann , et al. (19 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: The Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory followed up 18 gravitational wave (GW) triggers from the LIGO/Virgo collaboration during the O3 observing run in 2019/2020, performing approximately 6500 pointings in total. Of these events, four were finally classified (if real) as binary black hole (BH) triggers, six as binary neutron star (NS) events, two each of NSBH and Mass Gap triggers, one an unmodelled (… ▽ More The Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory followed up 18 gravitational wave (GW) triggers from the LIGO/Virgo collaboration during the O3 observing run in 2019/2020, performing approximately 6500 pointings in total. Of these events, four were finally classified (if real) as binary black hole (BH) triggers, six as binary neutron star (NS) events, two each of NSBH and Mass Gap triggers, one an unmodelled (Burst) trigger, and the remaining three were subsequently retracted. Thus far, four of these O3 triggers have been formally confirmed as real gravitational wave events. While no likely electromagnetic counterparts to any of these GW events have been identified in the X-ray data (to an average upper limit of 3.60 x 10^{-12} erg cm^{-2} s^{-1} over 0.3-10 keV), or at other wavelengths, we present a summary of all the Swift-XRT observations performed during O3, together with typical upper limits for each trigger observed. The majority of X-ray sources detected during O3 were previously uncatalogued; while some of these will be new (transient) sources, others are simply too faint to have been detected by earlier survey missions such as ROSAT. The all-sky survey currently being performed by eROSITA will be a very useful comparison for future observing runs, reducing the number of apparent candidate X-ray counterparts by up to 95 per cent. △ Less

Submitted 30 September, 2020; v1 submitted 29 September, 2020; originally announced September 2020.

Comments: 23 pages (including 4 pages of references, and a 4 page table in the appendix), 5 figures (4 in colour), accepted for publication in MNRAS. (Replaced due to annoying spelling typo in the abstract.)

Swift-XRT Follow-up of Gravitational Wave Triggers in the Second Advanced LIGO/Virgo Observing Run

Authors: N. J. Klingler, J. A. Kennea, P. A. Evans, A. Tohuvavohu, S. B. Cenko, S. D. Barthelmy, A. P. Beardmore, A. A. Breeveld, P. J. Brown, D. N. Burrows, S. Campana, G. Cusumano, A. D'Aì, P. D'Avanzo, V. D'Elia, M. de Pasquale, S. W. K. Emery, J. Garcia, P. Giommi, C. Gronwall, D. H. Hartmann, H. A. Krimm, N. P. M. Kuin, A. Lien, D. B. Malesani , et al. (15 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: The Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory carried out prompt searches for gravitational wave (GW) events detected by the LIGO/Virgo Collaboration (LVC) during the second observing run ("O2"). Swift performed extensive tiling of eight LVC triggers, two of which had very low false-alarm rates (GW 170814 and the epochal GW 170817), indicating a high confidence of being astrophysical in origin; the latter wa… ▽ More The Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory carried out prompt searches for gravitational wave (GW) events detected by the LIGO/Virgo Collaboration (LVC) during the second observing run ("O2"). Swift performed extensive tiling of eight LVC triggers, two of which had very low false-alarm rates (GW 170814 and the epochal GW 170817), indicating a high confidence of being astrophysical in origin; the latter was the first GW event to have an electromagnetic counterpart detected. In this paper we describe the follow-up performed during O2 and the results of our searches. No GW electromagnetic counterparts were detected; this result is expected, as GW 170817 remained the only astrophysical event containing at least one neutron star after LVC's later retraction of some events. A number of X-ray sources were detected, with the majority of identified sources being active galactic nuclei. We discuss the detection rate of transient X-ray sources and their implications in the O2 tiling searches. Finally, we describe the lessons learned during O2, and how these are being used to improve the \swift\ follow-up of GW events. In particular, we simulate a population of GRB afterglows to evaluate our source ranking system's ability to differentiate them from unrelated and uncatalogued X-ray sources. We find that $\approx$60-70% of afterglows whose jets are oriented towards Earth will be given high rank (i.e., "interesting" designation) by the completion of our second follow-up phase (assuming their location in the sky was observed), but that this fraction can be increased to nearly 100% by performing a third follow-up observation of sources exhibiting fading behavior. △ Less

Submitted 11 October, 2019; v1 submitted 25 September, 2019; originally announced September 2019.

Comments: 18 pages, 4 figures, 2 tables, accepted for publication in ApJS