Comparative Stability of Cloned and Non-cloned Code: A Replication Study
Authors:
Oualid El Halimi,
Trith Patel,
Zohaib S. Kiyani,
Naresh. Kumar,
Ankit Singh
Abstract:
Code cloning is an important software engineering aspect. It is a common software reuse principle that consists of duplicating source code within a program or across different systems owned or maintained by the same entity. There are several contradictory claims concerning the impact of cloning on software stability and maintenance effort. Some papers state that cloning is desired since it speeds…
▽ More
Code cloning is an important software engineering aspect. It is a common software reuse principle that consists of duplicating source code within a program or across different systems owned or maintained by the same entity. There are several contradictory claims concerning the impact of cloning on software stability and maintenance effort. Some papers state that cloning is desired since it speeds up the development process and helps stakeholders meet the tight schedule and deliver on time. Other papers argue that code clone leads to code bloat and causes increase software maintenance costs due to copied defects and dead code. In this paper, we are replicating a previous study done on cloning by the original author. We are repeating his work using the same methods and metrics but with different subjects and experimenters. The paper we are addressing evaluates the impact of code cloning on code stability using three different stability-measuring methods. Our team will apply the same stability measurement techniques on a different software system developed in C programming language to determine generalizability, assure that the results are reliable, validate their outcomes, and to inspire new search by combining previous findings from related studies.
△ Less
Submitted 28 April, 2015;
originally announced April 2015.
Towards Refactoring of DMARF and GIPSY Case Studies -- a Team 8 SOEN6471-S14 Project Report
Authors:
Nitish Agrawal,
Rachit Naidu,
Sadhana Viswanathan,
Vikram Wankhede,
Zakaria Nasereldine,
Zohaib S. Kiyani
Abstract:
Of the factors that determines the quality of a software system is its design and architecture. Having a good and clear design and architecture allows the system to evolve (plan and add new features), be easier to comprehend, easier to develop, easier to maintain; and in conclusion increase the life time of the, and being more competitive in its market. In the following paper we study the architec…
▽ More
Of the factors that determines the quality of a software system is its design and architecture. Having a good and clear design and architecture allows the system to evolve (plan and add new features), be easier to comprehend, easier to develop, easier to maintain; and in conclusion increase the life time of the, and being more competitive in its market. In the following paper we study the architecture of two different systems: GIPSY and DMARF. This paper provides a general overview of these two systems. What are these two systems, purpose, architecture, and their design patterns? Classes with week architecture and design, and code smells were also identified and some refactorings were suggested and implemented. Several tools were used throughout the paper for several purpose. LOGICSCOPE, JDeodoant, McCabe were used to identify classes with weak designs and code smells. Other tools and plugins were also used to identify class designs and relationships between classes such as ObjectAid (Eclipse plugin).
△ Less
Submitted 23 December, 2014;
originally announced December 2014.
