Insect Diversity Estimation in Polarimetric Lidar
Authors:
Dolores Bernenko,
Meng Li,
Hampus Månefjord,
Samuel Jansson,
Anna Runemark,
Carsten Kirkeby,
Mikkel Brydegaard
Abstract:
Identification of insects in flight is a particular challenge for ecologists in several settings with no other method able to count and classify insects at the pace of entomological lidar. Thus, it can play a unique role as a non-intrusive diagnostic tool to assess insect biodiversity, inform planning, and evaluate mitigation efforts aimed at tackling declines in insect abundance and diversity. Wh…
▽ More
Identification of insects in flight is a particular challenge for ecologists in several settings with no other method able to count and classify insects at the pace of entomological lidar. Thus, it can play a unique role as a non-intrusive diagnostic tool to assess insect biodiversity, inform planning, and evaluate mitigation efforts aimed at tackling declines in insect abundance and diversity. While species richness of co-existing insects could reach tens of thousands, to date, photonic sensors and lidars can differentiate roughly one hundred signal types. This taxonomic specificity or number of discernible signal types is currently limited by instrumentation and algorithm sophistication. In this study we report 32,533 observations of wild flying insects along a 500-meter transect. We report the benefits of lidar polarization bands for differentiating species and compare the performance of two unsupervised clustering algorithms, namely Hierarchical Cluster Analysis and Gaussian Mixture Model. We demonstrate that polarimetric properties could be partially predicted even with unpolarized light, thus polarimetric lidar bands provide only a minor improvement in specificity. Finally, we use physical properties of the clustered observation, such as wing beat frequency, daily activity patterns, and spatial distribution, to establish a lower bound for the number of species represented by the differentiated signal types.
△ Less
Submitted 3 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
Evaluation of diagnostic test procedures for SARS-CoV-2 using latent class models: comparison of antigen test kits and sampling for PCR testing based on Danish national data registries
Authors:
Jacob Stærk-Østergaard,
Carsten Kirkeby,
Lasse Engbo Christiansen,
Michael Asger Andersen,
Camilla Holten Møller,
Marianne Voldstedlund,
Matthew J. Denwood
Abstract:
Antigen test kits have been used extensively as a screening tool during the worldwide pandemic of coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2). While it is generally expected that taking samples for analysis with PCR testing gives more reliable results than using antigen test kits, the overall sensitivity and specificity of the two protocols in the field have not yet been estimated without assuming that the PCR test…
▽ More
Antigen test kits have been used extensively as a screening tool during the worldwide pandemic of coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2). While it is generally expected that taking samples for analysis with PCR testing gives more reliable results than using antigen test kits, the overall sensitivity and specificity of the two protocols in the field have not yet been estimated without assuming that the PCR test constitutes a gold standard. We use latent class models to estimate the in situ performance of both PCR and antigen testing, using data from the Danish national registries. The results are based on 240,000 paired tests results sub-selected from the 55 million test results that were obtained in Denmark during the period from February 2021 until June 2021.
We found that the specificity of both tests is very high in our data sample (>99.7%), while the sensitivity of PCR sampling was estimated to be 95.7% (95% CI: 92.8-98.4%) and that of the antigen test kits used in Denmark over the study period was estimated at 53.8% (95% CI: 49.8-57.9%). Our findings can be used as supplementary information for consideration when implementing serial testing strategies that employ a confirmatory PCR sample following a positive result from an antigen test kit, such as the policy used in Denmark. We note that while this strategy reduces the number of false positives associated with antigen test screening, it also increases the false negatives. We demonstrate that the balance of trading false positives for false negatives only favours the use of serial testing when the expected true prevalence is low. Our results contain substantial uncertainty in the estimates for sensitivity due to the relatively small number of positive test results over this period: validation of our findings in a population with higher prevalence would therefore be highly relevant for future work.
△ Less
Submitted 21 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
