Skip to main content

Showing 1–7 of 7 results for author: Kirk, J R

.
  1. arXiv:2405.12147  [pdf, other

    cs.AI cs.CL

    Eliciting Problem Specifications via Large Language Models

    Authors: Robert E. Wray, James R. Kirk, John E. Laird

    Abstract: Cognitive systems generally require a human to translate a problem definition into some specification that the cognitive system can use to attempt to solve the problem or perform the task. In this paper, we illustrate that large language models (LLMs) can be utilized to map a problem class, defined in natural language, into a semi-formal specification that can then be utilized by an existing reaso… ▽ More

    Submitted 10 June, 2024; v1 submitted 20 May, 2024; originally announced May 2024.

    Comments: 18 pages, Appendix. Revised in response to reviewer feedback. Accepted for Advances in Cognitive Systems (Jun 2024, Palermo)

    ACM Class: I.2.11; I.2.7

  2. arXiv:2310.06846  [pdf, other

    cs.AI cs.CL

    Exploiting Language Models as a Source of Knowledge for Cognitive Agents

    Authors: James R. Kirk, Robert E. Wray, John E. Laird

    Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) provide capabilities far beyond sentence completion, including question answering, summarization, and natural-language inference. While many of these capabilities have potential application to cognitive systems, our research is exploiting language models as a source of task knowledge for cognitive agents, that is, agents realized via a cognitive architecture. We identi… ▽ More

    Submitted 5 September, 2023; originally announced October 2023.

    Comments: 9 pages, 4 figures, 2 tables. AAAI FSS on Integrating Cognitive Architecture and Generative Models

    ACM Class: I.2.7; I.2.11

  3. arXiv:2306.06770  [pdf, other

    cs.AI cs.HC cs.RO

    Improving Knowledge Extraction from LLMs for Task Learning through Agent Analysis

    Authors: James R. Kirk, Robert E. Wray, Peter Lindes, John E. Laird

    Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) offer significant promise as a knowledge source for task learning. Prompt engineering has been shown to be effective for eliciting knowledge from an LLM, but alone it is insufficient for acquiring relevant, situationally grounded knowledge for an embodied agent learning novel tasks. We describe a cognitive-agent approach, STARS, that extends and complements prompt engi… ▽ More

    Submitted 20 February, 2024; v1 submitted 11 June, 2023; originally announced June 2023.

    Comments: 7 pages, 8 figures, 3 tables, bibliography, appendix (34 pages total). Accepted to AAAI 2024

    ACM Class: I.2.6; I.2.7

  4. The James Webb Space Telescope Mission

    Authors: Jonathan P. Gardner, John C. Mather, Randy Abbott, James S. Abell, Mark Abernathy, Faith E. Abney, John G. Abraham, Roberto Abraham, Yasin M. Abul-Huda, Scott Acton, Cynthia K. Adams, Evan Adams, David S. Adler, Maarten Adriaensen, Jonathan Albert Aguilar, Mansoor Ahmed, Nasif S. Ahmed, Tanjira Ahmed, Rüdeger Albat, Loïc Albert, Stacey Alberts, David Aldridge, Mary Marsha Allen, Shaune S. Allen, Martin Altenburg , et al. (983 additional authors not shown)

    Abstract: Twenty-six years ago a small committee report, building on earlier studies, expounded a compelling and poetic vision for the future of astronomy, calling for an infrared-optimized space telescope with an aperture of at least $4m$. With the support of their governments in the US, Europe, and Canada, 20,000 people realized that vision as the $6.5m$ James Webb Space Telescope. A generation of astrono… ▽ More

    Submitted 10 April, 2023; originally announced April 2023.

    Comments: Accepted by PASP for the special issue on The James Webb Space Telescope Overview, 29 pages, 4 figures

  5. arXiv:2209.07636  [pdf, other

    cs.LG cs.AI cs.CL

    Improving Language Model Prompting in Support of Semi-autonomous Task Learning

    Authors: James R. Kirk, Robert E. Wray, Peter Lindes, John E. Laird

    Abstract: Language models (LLMs) offer potential as a source of knowledge for agents that need to acquire new task competencies within a performance environment. We describe efforts toward a novel agent capability that can construct cues (or "prompts") that result in useful LLM responses for an agent learning a new task. Importantly, responses must not only be "reasonable" (a measure used commonly in resear… ▽ More

    Submitted 19 November, 2022; v1 submitted 13 September, 2022; originally announced September 2022.

    Comments: Accepted to ACS 2022 (poster)

    ACM Class: I.2.7; I.2.11

  6. arXiv:2208.09554  [pdf, other

    cs.AI

    Integrating Diverse Knowledge Sources for Online One-shot Learning of Novel Tasks

    Authors: James R. Kirk, Robert E. Wray, Peter Lindes, John E. Laird

    Abstract: Autonomous agents are able to draw on a wide variety of potential sources of task knowledge; however current approaches invariably focus on only one or two. Here we investigate the challenges and impact of exploiting diverse knowledge sources to learn online, in one-shot, new tasks for a simulated office mobile robot. The resulting agent, developed in the Soar cognitive architecture, uses the foll… ▽ More

    Submitted 15 May, 2023; v1 submitted 19 August, 2022; originally announced August 2022.

    Comments: 20 pages, 3 figures. (Added technical appendix based on reviewer feedback.)

    ACM Class: I.2.7; I.2.11

  7. arXiv:2109.08270  [pdf

    cs.AI cs.CL

    Language Models as a Knowledge Source for Cognitive Agents

    Authors: Robert E. Wray, III, James R. Kirk, John E. Laird

    Abstract: Language models (LMs) are sentence-completion engines trained on massive corpora. LMs have emerged as a significant breakthrough in natural-language processing, providing capabilities that go far beyond sentence completion including question answering, summarization, and natural-language inference. While many of these capabilities have potential application to cognitive systems, exploiting languag… ▽ More

    Submitted 23 October, 2021; v1 submitted 16 September, 2021; originally announced September 2021.

    Comments: 16 pages, 2 figures; accepted for 2021 Advances in Cognitive Systems Conference (revised based on reviews)

    ACM Class: I.2.7; I.2.11