-
Fairness in Agreement With European Values: An Interdisciplinary Perspective on AI Regulation
Authors:
Alejandra Bringas Colmenarejo,
Luca Nannini,
Alisa Rieger,
Kristen M. Scott,
Xuan Zhao,
Gourab K. Patro,
Gjergji Kasneci,
Katharina Kinder-Kurlanda
Abstract:
With increasing digitalization, Artificial Intelligence (AI) is becoming ubiquitous. AI-based systems to identify, optimize, automate, and scale solutions to complex economic and societal problems are being proposed and implemented. This has motivated regulation efforts, including the Proposal of an EU AI Act. This interdisciplinary position paper considers various concerns surrounding fairness an…
▽ More
With increasing digitalization, Artificial Intelligence (AI) is becoming ubiquitous. AI-based systems to identify, optimize, automate, and scale solutions to complex economic and societal problems are being proposed and implemented. This has motivated regulation efforts, including the Proposal of an EU AI Act. This interdisciplinary position paper considers various concerns surrounding fairness and discrimination in AI, and discusses how AI regulations address them, focusing on (but not limited to) the Proposal. We first look at AI and fairness through the lenses of law, (AI) industry, sociotechnology, and (moral) philosophy, and present various perspectives. Then, we map these perspectives along three axes of interests: (i) Standardization vs. Localization, (ii) Utilitarianism vs. Egalitarianism, and (iii) Consequential vs. Deontological ethics which leads us to identify a pattern of common arguments and tensions between these axes. Positioning the discussion within the axes of interest and with a focus on reconciling the key tensions, we identify and propose the roles AI Regulation should take to make the endeavor of the AI Act a success in terms of AI fairness concerns.
△ Less
Submitted 8 June, 2022;
originally announced July 2022.
-
Bias in Data-driven AI Systems -- An Introductory Survey
Authors:
Eirini Ntoutsi,
Pavlos Fafalios,
Ujwal Gadiraju,
Vasileios Iosifidis,
Wolfgang Nejdl,
Maria-Esther Vidal,
Salvatore Ruggieri,
Franco Turini,
Symeon Papadopoulos,
Emmanouil Krasanakis,
Ioannis Kompatsiaris,
Katharina Kinder-Kurlanda,
Claudia Wagner,
Fariba Karimi,
Miriam Fernandez,
Harith Alani,
Bettina Berendt,
Tina Kruegel,
Christian Heinze,
Klaus Broelemann,
Gjergji Kasneci,
Thanassis Tiropanis,
Steffen Staab
Abstract:
AI-based systems are widely employed nowadays to make decisions that have far-reaching impacts on individuals and society. Their decisions might affect everyone, everywhere and anytime, entailing concerns about potential human rights issues. Therefore, it is necessary to move beyond traditional AI algorithms optimized for predictive performance and embed ethical and legal principles in their desig…
▽ More
AI-based systems are widely employed nowadays to make decisions that have far-reaching impacts on individuals and society. Their decisions might affect everyone, everywhere and anytime, entailing concerns about potential human rights issues. Therefore, it is necessary to move beyond traditional AI algorithms optimized for predictive performance and embed ethical and legal principles in their design, training and deployment to ensure social good while still benefiting from the huge potential of the AI technology. The goal of this survey is to provide a broad multi-disciplinary overview of the area of bias in AI systems, focusing on technical challenges and solutions as well as to suggest new research directions towards approaches well-grounded in a legal frame. In this survey, we focus on data-driven AI, as a large part of AI is powered nowadays by (big) data and powerful Machine Learning (ML) algorithms. If otherwise not specified, we use the general term bias to describe problems related to the gathering or processing of data that might result in prejudiced decisions on the bases of demographic features like race, sex, etc.
△ Less
Submitted 14 January, 2020;
originally announced January 2020.
-
Characterizing the Global Crowd Workforce: A Cross-Country Comparison of Crowdworker Demographics
Authors:
Lisa Posch,
Arnim Bleier,
Fabian Flöck,
Clemens M. Lechner,
Katharina Kinder-Kurlanda,
Denis Helic,
Markus Strohmaier
Abstract:
Since its emergence roughly a decade ago, microtask crowdsourcing has been attracting a heterogeneous set of workers from all over the globe. This paper sets out to explore the characteristics of the international crowd workforce and offers a cross-national comparison of crowdworker populations from ten countries. We provide an analysis and comparison of demographic characteristics and shed light…
▽ More
Since its emergence roughly a decade ago, microtask crowdsourcing has been attracting a heterogeneous set of workers from all over the globe. This paper sets out to explore the characteristics of the international crowd workforce and offers a cross-national comparison of crowdworker populations from ten countries. We provide an analysis and comparison of demographic characteristics and shed light on the significance of microtask income for workers situated in different national contexts. With over 11,000 individual responses, this study is the first large-scale country-level analysis of the characteristics of workers on the platform Appen (formerly CrowdFlower and Figure Eight), one of the two platforms dominating the microtask market. We find large differences between the characteristics of the crowd workforces of different countries, both regarding demography and regarding the importance of microtask income for workers. Furthermore, we find that the composition of the workforce in the ten countries was largely stable across samples taken at different points in time.
△ Less
Submitted 3 November, 2022; v1 submitted 14 December, 2018;
originally announced December 2018.
-
Social Media Monitoring of the Campaigns for the 2013 German Bundestag Elections on Facebook and Twitter
Authors:
Lars Kaczmirek,
Philipp Mayr,
Ravi Vatrapu,
Arnim Bleier,
Manuela Blumenberg,
Tobias Gummer,
Abid Hussain,
Katharina Kinder-Kurlanda,
Kaveh Manshaei,
Mark Thamm,
Katrin Weller,
Alexander Wenz,
Christof Wolf
Abstract:
As more and more people use social media to communicate their view and perception of elections, researchers have increasingly been collecting and analyzing data from social media platforms. Our research focuses on social media communication related to the 2013 election of the German parlia-ment [translation: Bundestagswahl 2013]. We constructed several social media datasets using data from Faceboo…
▽ More
As more and more people use social media to communicate their view and perception of elections, researchers have increasingly been collecting and analyzing data from social media platforms. Our research focuses on social media communication related to the 2013 election of the German parlia-ment [translation: Bundestagswahl 2013]. We constructed several social media datasets using data from Facebook and Twitter. First, we identified the most relevant candidates (n=2,346) and checked whether they maintained social media accounts. The Facebook data was collected in November 2013 for the period of January 2009 to October 2013. On Facebook we identified 1,408 Facebook walls containing approximately 469,000 posts. Twitter data was collected between June and December 2013 finishing with the constitution of the government. On Twitter we identified 1,009 candidates and 76 other agents, for example, journalists. We estimated the number of relevant tweets to exceed eight million for the period from July 27 to September 27 alone. In this document we summarize past research in the literature, discuss possibilities for research with our data set, explain the data collection procedures, and provide a description of the data and a discussion of issues for archiving and dissemination of social media data.
△ Less
Submitted 1 April, 2014; v1 submitted 16 December, 2013;
originally announced December 2013.
