Exploring the Boundaries of GPT-4 in Radiology
Authors:
Qianchu Liu,
Stephanie Hyland,
Shruthi Bannur,
Kenza Bouzid,
Daniel C. Castro,
Maria Teodora Wetscherek,
Robert Tinn,
Harshita Sharma,
Fernando Pérez-García,
Anton Schwaighofer,
Pranav Rajpurkar,
Sameer Tajdin Khanna,
Hoifung Poon,
Naoto Usuyama,
Anja Thieme,
Aditya V. Nori,
Matthew P. Lungren,
Ozan Oktay,
Javier Alvarez-Valle
Abstract:
The recent success of general-domain large language models (LLMs) has significantly changed the natural language processing paradigm towards a unified foundation model across domains and applications. In this paper, we focus on assessing the performance of GPT-4, the most capable LLM so far, on the text-based applications for radiology reports, comparing against state-of-the-art (SOTA) radiology-s…
▽ More
The recent success of general-domain large language models (LLMs) has significantly changed the natural language processing paradigm towards a unified foundation model across domains and applications. In this paper, we focus on assessing the performance of GPT-4, the most capable LLM so far, on the text-based applications for radiology reports, comparing against state-of-the-art (SOTA) radiology-specific models. Exploring various prompting strategies, we evaluated GPT-4 on a diverse range of common radiology tasks and we found GPT-4 either outperforms or is on par with current SOTA radiology models. With zero-shot prompting, GPT-4 already obtains substantial gains ($\approx$ 10% absolute improvement) over radiology models in temporal sentence similarity classification (accuracy) and natural language inference ($F_1$). For tasks that require learning dataset-specific style or schema (e.g. findings summarisation), GPT-4 improves with example-based prompting and matches supervised SOTA. Our extensive error analysis with a board-certified radiologist shows GPT-4 has a sufficient level of radiology knowledge with only occasional errors in complex context that require nuanced domain knowledge. For findings summarisation, GPT-4 outputs are found to be overall comparable with existing manually-written impressions.
△ Less
Submitted 23 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
