XRBench: An Extended Reality (XR) Machine Learning Benchmark Suite for the Metaverse
Authors:
Hyoukjun Kwon,
Krishnakumar Nair,
Jamin Seo,
Jason Yik,
Debabrata Mohapatra,
Dongyuan Zhan,
**ook Song,
Peter Capak,
Peizhao Zhang,
Peter Vajda,
Colby Banbury,
Mark Mazumder,
Liangzhen Lai,
Ashish Sirasao,
Tushar Krishna,
Harshit Khaitan,
Vikas Chandra,
Vijay Janapa Reddi
Abstract:
Real-time multi-task multi-model (MTMM) workloads, a new form of deep learning inference workloads, are emerging for applications areas like extended reality (XR) to support metaverse use cases. These workloads combine user interactivity with computationally complex machine learning (ML) activities. Compared to standard ML applications, these ML workloads present unique difficulties and constraint…
▽ More
Real-time multi-task multi-model (MTMM) workloads, a new form of deep learning inference workloads, are emerging for applications areas like extended reality (XR) to support metaverse use cases. These workloads combine user interactivity with computationally complex machine learning (ML) activities. Compared to standard ML applications, these ML workloads present unique difficulties and constraints. Real-time MTMM workloads impose heterogeneity and concurrency requirements on future ML systems and devices, necessitating the development of new capabilities. This paper begins with a discussion of the various characteristics of these real-time MTMM ML workloads and presents an ontology for evaluating the performance of future ML hardware for XR systems. Next, we present XRBENCH, a collection of MTMM ML tasks, models, and usage scenarios that execute these models in three representative ways: cascaded, concurrent, and cascaded-concurrent for XR use cases. Finally, we emphasize the need for new metrics that capture the requirements properly. We hope that our work will stimulate research and lead to the development of a new generation of ML systems for XR use cases. XRBench is available as an open-source project: https://github.com/XRBench
△ Less
Submitted 19 May, 2023; v1 submitted 16 November, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
Authors:
Norman P. Jouppi,
Cliff Young,
Nishant Patil,
David Patterson,
Gaurav Agrawal,
Raminder Bajwa,
Sarah Bates,
Suresh Bhatia,
Nan Boden,
Al Borchers,
Rick Boyle,
Pierre-luc Cantin,
Clifford Chao,
Chris Clark,
Jeremy Coriell,
Mike Daley,
Matt Dau,
Jeffrey Dean,
Ben Gelb,
Tara Vazir Ghaemmaghami,
Rajendra Gottipati,
William Gulland,
Robert Hagmann,
C. Richard Ho,
Doug Hogberg
, et al. (50 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Many architects believe that major improvements in cost-energy-performance must now come from domain-specific hardware. This paper evaluates a custom ASIC---called a Tensor Processing Unit (TPU)---deployed in datacenters since 2015 that accelerates the inference phase of neural networks (NN). The heart of the TPU is a 65,536 8-bit MAC matrix multiply unit that offers a peak throughput of 92 TeraOp…
▽ More
Many architects believe that major improvements in cost-energy-performance must now come from domain-specific hardware. This paper evaluates a custom ASIC---called a Tensor Processing Unit (TPU)---deployed in datacenters since 2015 that accelerates the inference phase of neural networks (NN). The heart of the TPU is a 65,536 8-bit MAC matrix multiply unit that offers a peak throughput of 92 TeraOps/second (TOPS) and a large (28 MiB) software-managed on-chip memory. The TPU's deterministic execution model is a better match to the 99th-percentile response-time requirement of our NN applications than are the time-varying optimizations of CPUs and GPUs (caches, out-of-order execution, multithreading, multiprocessing, prefetching, ...) that help average throughput more than guaranteed latency. The lack of such features helps explain why, despite having myriad MACs and a big memory, the TPU is relatively small and low power. We compare the TPU to a server-class Intel Haswell CPU and an Nvidia K80 GPU, which are contemporaries deployed in the same datacenters. Our workload, written in the high-level TensorFlow framework, uses production NN applications (MLPs, CNNs, and LSTMs) that represent 95% of our datacenters' NN inference demand. Despite low utilization for some applications, the TPU is on average about 15X - 30X faster than its contemporary GPU or CPU, with TOPS/Watt about 30X - 80X higher. Moreover, using the GPU's GDDR5 memory in the TPU would triple achieved TOPS and raise TOPS/Watt to nearly 70X the GPU and 200X the CPU.
△ Less
Submitted 16 April, 2017;
originally announced April 2017.
