-
Justifying the Principle of Interval Constraints
Authors:
Richard E. Neapolitan,
James Kenevan
Abstract:
When knowledge is obtained from a database, it is only possible to deduce confidence intervals for probability values. With confidence intervals replacing point values, the results in the set covering model include interval constraints for the probabilities of mutually exclusive and exhaustive explanations. The Principle of Interval Constraints ranks these explanations by determining the expected…
▽ More
When knowledge is obtained from a database, it is only possible to deduce confidence intervals for probability values. With confidence intervals replacing point values, the results in the set covering model include interval constraints for the probabilities of mutually exclusive and exhaustive explanations. The Principle of Interval Constraints ranks these explanations by determining the expected values of the probabilities based on distributions determined from the interval, constraints. This principle was developed using the Classical Approach to probability. This paper justifies the Principle of Interval Constraints with a more rigorous statement of the Classical Approach and by defending the concept of probabilities of probabilities.
△ Less
Submitted 27 March, 2013;
originally announced April 2013.
-
Computation of Variances in Causal Networks
Authors:
Richard E. Neapolitan,
James Kenevan
Abstract:
The causal (belief) network is a well-known graphical structure for representing independencies in a joint probability distribution. The exact methods and the approximation methods, which perform probabilistic inference in causal networks, often treat the conditional probabilities which are stored in the network as certain values. However, if one takes either a subjectivistic or a limiting frequen…
▽ More
The causal (belief) network is a well-known graphical structure for representing independencies in a joint probability distribution. The exact methods and the approximation methods, which perform probabilistic inference in causal networks, often treat the conditional probabilities which are stored in the network as certain values. However, if one takes either a subjectivistic or a limiting frequency approach to probability, one can never be certain of probability values. An algorithm for probabilistic inference should not only be capable of reporting the inferred probabilities; it should also be capable of reporting the uncertainty in these probabilities relative to the uncertainty in the probabilities which are stored in the network. In section 2 of this paper a method is given for determining the prior variances of the probabilities of all the nodes. Section 3 contains an approximation method for determining the variances in inferred probabilities.
△ Less
Submitted 27 March, 2013;
originally announced April 2013.
-
Investigation of Variances in Belief Networks
Authors:
Richard E. Neapolitan,
James Kenevan
Abstract:
The belief network is a well-known graphical structure for representing independences in a joint probability distribution. The methods, which perform probabilistic inference in belief networks, often treat the conditional probabilities which are stored in the network as certain values. However, if one takes either a subjectivistic or a limiting frequency approach to probability, one can never be…
▽ More
The belief network is a well-known graphical structure for representing independences in a joint probability distribution. The methods, which perform probabilistic inference in belief networks, often treat the conditional probabilities which are stored in the network as certain values. However, if one takes either a subjectivistic or a limiting frequency approach to probability, one can never be certain of probability values. An algorithm should not only be capable of reporting the probabilities of the alternatives of remaining nodes when other nodes are instantiated; it should also be capable of reporting the uncertainty in these probabilities relative to the uncertainty in the probabilities which are stored in the network. In this paper a method for determining the variances in inferred probabilities is obtained under the assumption that a posterior distribution on the uncertainty variables can be approximated by the prior distribution. It is shown that this assumption is plausible if their is a reasonable amount of confidence in the probabilities which are stored in the network. Furthermore in this paper, a surprising upper bound for the prior variances in the probabilities of the alternatives of all nodes is obtained in the case where the probability distributions of the probabilities of the alternatives are beta distributions. It is shown that the prior variance in the probability at an alternative of a node is bounded above by the largest variance in an element of the conditional probability distribution for that node.
△ Less
Submitted 20 March, 2013;
originally announced March 2013.
-
An Implementation of a Method for Computing the Uncertainty in Inferred Probabilities in Belief Networks
Authors:
Peter Che,
Richard E. Neapolitan,
James Kenevan,
Martha Evens
Abstract:
In recent years the belief network has been used increasingly to model systems in Al that must perform uncertain inference. The development of efficient algorithms for probabilistic inference in belief networks has been a focus of much research in AI. Efficient algorithms for certain classes of belief networks have been developed, but the problem of reporting the uncertainty in inferred probabili…
▽ More
In recent years the belief network has been used increasingly to model systems in Al that must perform uncertain inference. The development of efficient algorithms for probabilistic inference in belief networks has been a focus of much research in AI. Efficient algorithms for certain classes of belief networks have been developed, but the problem of reporting the uncertainty in inferred probabilities has received little attention. A system should not only be capable of reporting the values of inferred probabilities and/or the favorable choices of a decision; it should report the range of possible error in the inferred probabilities and/or choices. Two methods have been developed and implemented for determining the variance in inferred probabilities in belief networks. These methods, the Approximate Propagation Method and the Monte Carlo Integration Method are discussed and compared in this paper.
△ Less
Submitted 6 March, 2013;
originally announced March 2013.
