Prospective Learning: Principled Extrapolation to the Future
Authors:
Ashwin De Silva,
Rahul Ramesh,
Lyle Ungar,
Marshall Hussain Shuler,
Noah J. Cowan,
Michael Platt,
Chen Li,
Leyla Isik,
Seung-Eon Roh,
Adam Charles,
Archana Venkataraman,
Brian Caffo,
Javier J. How,
Justus M Kebschull,
John W. Krakauer,
Maxim Bichuch,
Kaleab Alemayehu Kinfu,
Eva Yezerets,
Dinesh Jayaraman,
Jong M. Shin,
Soledad Villar,
Ian Phillips,
Carey E. Priebe,
Thomas Hartung,
Michael I. Miller
, et al. (18 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Learning is a process which can update decision rules, based on past experience, such that future performance improves. Traditionally, machine learning is often evaluated under the assumption that the future will be identical to the past in distribution or change adversarially. But these assumptions can be either too optimistic or pessimistic for many problems in the real world. Real world scenari…
▽ More
Learning is a process which can update decision rules, based on past experience, such that future performance improves. Traditionally, machine learning is often evaluated under the assumption that the future will be identical to the past in distribution or change adversarially. But these assumptions can be either too optimistic or pessimistic for many problems in the real world. Real world scenarios evolve over multiple spatiotemporal scales with partially predictable dynamics. Here we reformulate the learning problem to one that centers around this idea of dynamic futures that are partially learnable. We conjecture that certain sequences of tasks are not retrospectively learnable (in which the data distribution is fixed), but are prospectively learnable (in which distributions may be dynamic), suggesting that prospective learning is more difficult in kind than retrospective learning. We argue that prospective learning more accurately characterizes many real world problems that (1) currently stymie existing artificial intelligence solutions and/or (2) lack adequate explanations for how natural intelligences solve them. Thus, studying prospective learning will lead to deeper insights and solutions to currently vexing challenges in both natural and artificial intelligences.
△ Less
Submitted 13 July, 2023; v1 submitted 18 January, 2022;
originally announced January 2022.
Rosetta Brains: A Strategy for Molecularly-Annotated Connectomics
Authors:
Adam H Marblestone,
Evan R Daugharthy,
Reza Kalhor,
Ian D Peikon,
Justus M Kebschull,
Seth L Shipman,
Yuriy Mishchenko,
Je Hyuk Lee,
Konrad P Kording,
Edward S Boyden,
Anthony M Zador,
George M Church
Abstract:
We propose a neural connectomics strategy called Fluorescent In-Situ Sequencing of Barcoded Individual Neuronal Connections (FISSEQ-BOINC), leveraging fluorescent in situ nucleic acid sequencing in fixed tissue (FISSEQ). FISSEQ-BOINC exhibits different properties from BOINC, which relies on bulk nucleic acid sequencing. FISSEQ-BOINC could become a scalable approach for map** whole-mammalian-brai…
▽ More
We propose a neural connectomics strategy called Fluorescent In-Situ Sequencing of Barcoded Individual Neuronal Connections (FISSEQ-BOINC), leveraging fluorescent in situ nucleic acid sequencing in fixed tissue (FISSEQ). FISSEQ-BOINC exhibits different properties from BOINC, which relies on bulk nucleic acid sequencing. FISSEQ-BOINC could become a scalable approach for map** whole-mammalian-brain connectomes with rich molecular annotations.
△ Less
Submitted 21 April, 2014;
originally announced April 2014.
